Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ir J Med Sci ; 192(4): 1993-2000, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36935446

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The annual conference of the Irish College of Ophthalmologists (ICO) is a key calendar event for ophthalmology research in Ireland. AIMS: We investigated whether there were identifiable trends across various domains for the last twelve ICO meetings. Our objectives were to assess subspeciality and training centre representation, as well as the characteristics of the first author to include gender and stage of training. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of paper and poster presentations from the ICO annual conference yearbooks was conducted. The representation of subspecialties, affiliated institutions, and gender distribution were noted for both categories. For paper presentations, the author's career stage, full-text publication rates, and impact factors were also determined. RESULTS: A total of 306 paper presentations and 306 poster presentations were analysed. The subspecialty of retina had the highest representation within both sections. The overall mean publication rate was 38% (range, 6-39%), with a mean journal impact factor of 2.02. No statistically significant differences in gender noted with regard to poster, paper, or publications (p < 0.9, p < 0.1, p < 0.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review of all research contributions to the ICO conference. We found that there is a need to promote research in some underrepresented subspecialities and training centres. No significant gender bias was found. There is scope to improve the publication conversion rate; this would allow for greater dissemination of the research presented at the ICO meeting.


Assuntos
Oftalmologistas , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sexismo , Fator de Impacto de Revistas , Irlanda
2.
Clin Obes ; 12(3): e12510, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35201671

RESUMO

The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is a proposed clinical practice tool to determine obesity severity. In a secondary analysis of the Pregnancy Exercise and Research Study (PEARS) (a mobile-health-supported lifestyle intervention among pregnant women with body mass index [BMI] ≥25 kg/m2 ), we apply the EOSS and explore relationships with pregnancy outcomes. In early (14-16 weeks) and late (28 weeks) pregnancy, fasting lipids and glucose were measured, blood pressure was extracted from medical records and maternal well-being was assessed using the WHO-5 Well-being Index. Pearson's correlations, chi-square statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to identify relationships. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare groups. Pregnant women (n = 348) were mean (SD) age 32.44 (4.39) years and median (interquartile range) BMI 28.0 (26.57, 29.88) kg/m2 . Using metabolic criteria only, 81.9% and 98.9% had raised EOSS scores in early and late pregnancy. From early to late pregnancy, EOSS scores increased by 60.1%. Of these, 10.5% experienced a 2-point increase, moving from stage 0 to stage 2. There was a potential relationship between early EOSS and large for gestational age (χ2  = 6.42, df (2), p = .04), although significance was lost when controlled for confounders (p = .223) and multiple testing. Most women with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 had raised EOSS scores, limiting the clinical utility of the tool.


Assuntos
Sobrepeso , Resultado da Gravidez , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Obesidade , Sobrepeso/complicações , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...