Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 33(6): 817-21, 2013 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23873890

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that scarring is a primary reason for patient dissatisfaction with reduction mammaplasty. OBJECTIVES: The authors prospectively evaluated patient preferences for the 3 most common breast reduction scar patterns: horizontal, vertical, and Wise. METHODS: Sixty-six patients were recruited for the study before receiving their reduction mammaplasty consultation. Each patient was shown line drawings and postoperative photographs of the 3 breast reduction techniques and scored the scars on a modified 10-point Likert scale (1 = unacceptable; 10 = acceptable). The survey responses had no impact on the patients' medical care. A nonparametric Friedman test was used to compare the mean scores, and univariate generalized linear regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounding factors. Post hoc analysis was performed using the Bonferroni method. Significance was set at P < .001. RESULTS: Sixty patients completed the study. The mean preference ranking was significantly higher for the horizontal scar pattern versus vertical and Wise (P < .001). The mean score difference between the horizontal and Wise patterns was 2.982. The mean difference between the horizontal and vertical patterns was 2.27. There was no significant difference in preference between the vertical and Wise patterns. Linear regression analysis showed that age, body mass index, and torso/bra size had no significant effect on preference. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study designed to prospectively evaluate patient preferences regarding postoperative scars. Results indicate that the horizontal technique is preferable with respect to scar placement.


Assuntos
Cicatriz/etiologia , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Preferência do Paciente , Adulto , Tamanho Corporal , Cicatriz/prevenção & controle , Cicatriz/psicologia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Mamoplastia/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
World J Urol ; 31(1): 175-81, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22843075

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine whether the method of bladder cuff excision (BCE) during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is associated with rates of disease recurrence or metastases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomies performed at our institution over 10 years. Three methods of BCE were used: transurethral incision (TUI) with Collins knife and a single intravesical port, open extravesical, and open intravesical via cystotomy. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether BCE method was associated with recurrence or metastases. RESULTS: Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy was performed in 110 patients. BCE was performed via TUI in 61 patients, open extravesical in 29, and open intravesical in 20. After a median follow-up of 22 months, 36 patients (32.7 %) developed recurrences. Metastases were observed in 18 patients (16.4 %). Recurrence rates were 32.8, 27.6, and 40.0 % in the TUI, extravesical, and intravesical groups, respectively (p = 0.69). Positive surgical margins occurred in nine patients with no significant difference between groups. Factors associated with recurrence or metastases in a multivariate regression analysis were stage, positive surgical margins and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The method of BCE was not associated with oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The three methods of bladder cuff excision (TUI, extravesical, and intravesical) are oncologically valid with similar recurrence and metastases rates when performed during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Stage, positive margin status and CIS are predictive of adverse oncologic outcomes and can facilitate postoperative prognostication.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Cistectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Nefrectomia/métodos , Ureter/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ureterais/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pelve Renal , Laparoscopia/métodos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inoculação de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Can J Plast Surg ; 16(4): 211-5, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19949499

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Capsular contracture after augmentation mammoplasty occurs at a rate of 15% to 45%. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of implant core type (silicone versus saline) on the rate of capsular contracture in augmentation mammoplasty. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted through a search of three electronic databases. Two reviewers independently scanned titles yielded by the search and identified potentially relevant papers. Inter-reviewer variability and the scientific quality of the articles were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-eight titles of potential relevance were selected from the 393 articles yielded by the search. Inter-rater agreement for selection of potentially relevant articles was 84% (kappa=0.54). Four comparative studies were included in the analysis. Scientific quality scores of the included studies ranged from 5 of 14 to 9 of 14. Three of the four studies reported a higher rate of capsular contracture in patients with silicone implants. A combined odds ratio calculated on two of the studies found a 2.25-fold increased risk of capsular contracture in patients who received silicone implants. Eight series of patients who received cohesive gel silicone implants reported rates of capsular contracture from 0% to 13.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of capsular contracture were found in patients who received silicone implants when compared with those who received saline implants. However, the scientific quality of the comparative studies to date on this subject is poor. Recent series evaluating cohesive gel implants report relatively low rates of capsular contracture. A randomized controlled trial comparing rates of capsular contracture in cohesive gel and saline implants is recommended.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...