Scoping review of current challenges and circumstances impacting Indigenous applications to Canadian medical schools.

Introduction: Considering the relevant 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission recommendations, this paper reviews the current state of Canadian medical schools' Indigenous admissions processes and explores continued barriers faced by Indigenous applicants. Methods: A summary of literature illustrating disadvantages for Indigenous applicants of current admissions tools is presented. A grey literature search of current admissions requirements, interview processes, and other relevant data from each medical school was performed. Tables comparing differences in their approaches are included. A calculation of Indigenous access to medical school seats compared to the broader Canadian population was conducted. Gaps in execution are explored, culminating in a table of recommendations. Results: Despite formal commitments to reduce barriers, Indigenous applicants to medical school in Canada still face barriers that non-Indigenous applicants do not. Most programs use tools for admission known to disadvantage Indigenous applicants. Indigenous applicants do not have equitable access to medical school seats. Facilitated Indigenous stream processes first ensure Indigenous applicants meet all minimum requirements of Canadian students, and then require further work. Discussion: Seven years after the Truth and Reconciliation Commission called on Canadian universities and governments to train more Indigenous health care providers, there has been limited progress to reduce the structural disadvantages Indigenous students face when applying to medical school. Based on best practices observed in Canada and coupled with relevant Indigenous-focused literature, recommendations are made for multiple stakeholders. Conclusions: The study was limited by the data available on numbers of Indigenous applicants and matriculants. Where available, data are not encouraging as to equitable access to medical school for Indigenous populations in Canada. These findings were presented at the International Congress of Academic Medicine 2023 Conference, April 2023, Quebec City, Canada.

Introduction: Compte tenu des recommandations pertinentes de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation de 2015, cet article examine l'état actuel des processus d'admission des Autochtones dans les facultés de médecine canadiennes et explore les obstacles persistants auxquels sont confrontés les candidats autochtones. Méthodes: Un résumé de la littérature illustrant les désavantages des outils d'admission actuels pour les candidats autochtones est présenté. Une recherche de la littérature grise a été effectuée sur les exigences d'admission actuelles, les processus d'entrevue et d'autres données pertinentes de chaque faculté de médecine. Des tableaux comparant les différences entre leurs approches sont inclus. Un calcul de l'accès des Autochtones aux places dans les facultés de médecine par rapport à l'ensemble de la population canadienne a été effectué. Les lacunes dans l'exécution sont explorées, aboutissant à un tableau de recommandations. Résultats: Malgré les engagements officiels visant à réduire les obstacles, les candidats autochtones qui appliquent aux facultés de médecine canadiennes se heurtent encore à des obstacles auxquels les candidats non autochtones ne sont pas confrontés. La plupart des programmes utilisent des outils d'admission connus pour désavantager les candidats autochtones. Les candidats autochtones n'ont pas un accès équitable aux places dans les facultés de médecine. Des processus d'accès facilités pour les autochtones permettent d'abord de s'assurer que les candidats autochtones satisfont à toutes les exigences minimales des étudiants canadiens, puis nécessitent d'autres travaux. Discussion: Sept ans après que la Commission de vérité et réconciliation ait demandé aux universités et aux gouvernements canadiens de former davantage de prestataires de soins en santé autochtone, les progrès réalisés pour réduire les désavantages structurels auxquels les étudiants autochtones sont confrontés lorsqu'ils posent leur candidature à une faculté de médecine sont limités. Sur la base des meilleures pratiques observées au Canada et de la littérature autochtone pertinente, des recommandations sont formulées à l'intention de multiples parties prenantes. Conclusions: L'étude est limitée par les données disponibles sur le nombre de candidats et d'étudiants autochtones. Lorsqu'elles sont disponibles, les données ne sont pas encourageantes en ce qui concerne l'accès équitable aux études de médecine pour les populations autochtones au Canada. Ces conclusions ont été présentées lors de l'édition 2023 du Congrès international de médecine universitaire (CIMU) qui s'est déroulé en avril 2023 dans la ville de Québec, au Canada.

Charcot Arthropathy of the Spine.

Charcot arthropathy of the spine (CSA), also known as spinal neuroarthropathy, is a progressive disease process in which the biomechanical elements of stability of the spine are compromised because of the loss of neuroprotection leading to joint destruction, deformity, and pain. Initially thought to be associated with infectious causes such as syphilis; however in the latter part of the century, Charcot arthropathy of the spine has become associated with traumatic spinal cord injury. Clinical diagnosis is challenging because of the delayed presentation of symptoms and concurrent differential diagnosis. Although radiological features can assist with diagnosis, the need for recognition and associated treatment is vital to limit the lifelong disability with the disease. The goals of treatment are to limit symptoms and provide spinal stabilization. Surgical treatment of these patients can be demanding, and alternative techniques of instrumentation are often required.

Early versus late weight bearing & ankle mobilization in the postoperative management of ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: While open reduction and internal fixation is currently considered the optimum treatment option for displaced ankle fractures, the most optimal post-operative rehabilitation strategy in this setting remains unclear. The objective of this investigation was to compare the effect of early vs. late weight bearing and ankle mobilization in the post-operative management of ankle fractures. METHODS: Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, CINHAL, and Web of Science were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. Two review authors screened articles, abstracted data, and evaluated risk of bias in duplicate. Outcomes of interest included post-operative ankle function and overall time to return to work. Studies on weight bearing and ankle mobilization were analysed separately and all data were pooled using random-effects models. RESULTS: Eighteen trials were included in the review of which 14 were included in the meta-analysis of at least one outcome of interest. Majority of the studies presented a high overall risk of bias. Early weight bearing demonstrated significantly better short-term postoperative functional scores at 6-9 weeks postoperatively (SMD: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.58; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). However, the functional effect of early weight bearing compared to late weight bearing gradually became equivalent by the 6 month postoperative time-period. Early weight bearing also demonstrated a significant reduction in the time to return to work/daily activities (MD: -12.29, 95% CI: -17.39, -7.19; p < 0.0001; I2 = 0%). In comparison, no significant differences were found between early ankle mobilization/exercises and immobilization. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a potential role of EWB in improving post-operative ankle-function in the short-term and reducing the overall time to return to work/daily activities, but no clinical benefit associated with early ankle mobilization post-surgery.

Management of pelvic fracture-associated urethral injuries: A survey of Canadian urologists.

INTRODUCTION: The management of pelvic fracture-associated urethral injuries (PFUI) is not standardized and optimal management is controversial. We surveyed Canadian urologists about their experiences and opinions regarding optimal management of PFUI. METHODS: Canadian urologists were surveyed via an anonymous, bilingual, web-based, 12-item questionnaire. A total of 735 Canadian urologists were invited to participate via email distributed by the Canadian Urological Association. RESULTS: Of the 146 urologists who participated (19.9% response rate), the majority practice at a trauma centre (53.2%), but manage only 1-5 PFUI/year (71.5%). Most participants (82.6%) favour primary realignment compared to suprapubic (SP) tube with delayed repair (15.3%) and immediate reconstruction (2.1%). Compared to SP diversion and delayed repair, the majority of participants believe primary realignment is associated with equivocal incontinence (61.2%) and erectile dysfunction rates (75.8%), but has lower stricture rates (73.0%). Among respondents who perform primary realignment, 45.4% concurrently place a SP tube, while 54.6% do not. While 91% believe SP tubes do not increase the risk of pelvic hardware infections, 31.6% report that orthopedic surgeons alter their management of pelvic fractures in the presence of a SP tube. CONCLUSIONS: Most Canadian urologist respondents - even those practicing at trauma centres - manage very few PFUIs/year. There is reasonable consensus among respondents that primary realignment is favourable to delayed or immediate reconstruction, but discordance on whether or not to place concurrent SP tubes. The urological and orthopedic consequences of SP tubes in the management of traumatic urological injuries warrant further investigation.

Measuring foot and ankle injury outcomes: common scales and checklists.

Functional health outcome measures are increasingly being used in both clinica trials and practice as measures of patient health. Whilst outcome measures can be generic, there are a number of foot and ankle specific measures available and in use. These are being used as not only region specific but also disease specific measures of patient function. Unfortunately not all of these outcome measures have been completely validated which leads to challenges in applying the results of outcomes research to specific patients. Continued work however is being done in this area and these challenges provide opportunities for further investigation into the role of functional outcome scores specific to the foot and ankle.