How-I-do-it: laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection (LISD) for gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction early lesions.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection (LISD) is a novel approach to the resection of gastric lesion that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic approaches. The technique permits favourable access to lesions situated at the cardia and angular notch of the stomach, enables en-bloc resection of large areas of tissue, and can prevent the need of formal gastrectomy or oesophagectomy in selected patients. METHODS: All cases were deemed suitable for LISD by a multidisciplinary team panel following endoscopic assessment (using white light enhancement, chromoendoscopy and magnification endoscopy) that was integrated when needed with EUS, CT scan or PET scan. The surgical technique consisted in a 3-port laparoscopic approach; after establishment of pneumoperitoneum, three gastrotomies were performed to enable port insertion into the stomach. Following establishment of stable pneumogastrium, the area of interest was identified, submucosal hyaluronic acid injection performed to provide a cushion in the plane of dissection, and the excision area was circumferentially marked with cautery. Resection was completed using cautery hook, along a plane parallel to the muscolaris propria. After the specimen was extracted in a retrieval bag, intracorporeal single layer running suture closure of gastrotomies was performed. The abdominal wall closed by layers and tap block performed along with local anaesthetic injection on skin incision. Measures were taken to ensure correct orientation of resected specimens prior to fixation. RESULTS: During the study period that spans from 2014 and 2022, a total of 11 patients underwent LISD for limited lesions of the stomach, 10 were located at gastro-oesophageal junction and one at the angular incisura. Four patients were female, seven males. The median age was 74 (46-79) years. R0 resection rate was 54.5%. Mean operative time was 109 min with very low blood loss (10 ml). Mortality rate was 0%, no immediate major complications (Grade II-V Clavien Dindo), including haemorrhage or perforation, occurred in these cases. Two patients developed dysphagia later that was successfully treated with endoscopic balloon dilatations. Median hospital stay was 3 days and median oral intake was on day 1 post-procedural. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic intragastric submucosal dissection is shown to be a safe and effective intervention for the treatment of early gastric cancers in selected patients having undergone deemed not amenable for endoscopic submucosal resection for their technically challenging location. Its application can serve as route to avoid formal surgery and the associated morbidity.

Strangulated richter's hernia with caecum necrosis. Case report.

AIM: Describe a rare case of Richter's hernia with caecum incarceration into a right femoral hernia and provide a narrative literature review about its surgical management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 46-year-old woman presented to the Emergency Department and to our surgical unit with a two-days history of worsening abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant without nausea or vomiting, associated with an irreducible lump. Computed tomography of the abdomen described a right inguinal hernia containing small bowel with perivisceral fluid in it without signs of small bowel occlusion nor perforation. RESULTS: A Richter 's femoral hernia with necrotic caecum wall was found but the appendix was not involved. Through a mini-laparotomy, tangential caecal resection and appendectomy were performed. The femoral defect was repaired with a polypropylene mesh-plug placed in the pre-peritoneal space. Postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the fifth post-operative day. DISCUSSION: Femoral hernias account for only 2-4% of all groin hernias and occur through a small fascial defect in the femoral canal. Due to its narrowness, it leads to a high risk of incarceration and strangulation thus explaining the increased mortality in the emergency setting (up to 10 fold compared with the elective repair). In some cases, symptoms are no specific and uncommon findings have been reported. Surgical exploration is mandatory in the presence of signs of bowel strangulation or perforation and different approaches (either open or laparoscopically) have been described in literature. CONCLUSIONS: Caecum wall necrosis secondary to an incarcerated Richter's femoral hernia is a rare but dangerous event. Surgical approach is selected on surgeon's expertise. The use of prosthetic mesh is always recommended. KEY WORDS: Bowel necrosis, Emergency surgery, Hernia repair, Richter's hernia.

Surgical Skills and Technological Advancements to Avoid Complications in Lateral Neck Dissection for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Neck dissection is a surgical procedure reserved for thyroid cancer cases with clinically evident lymphatic invasion. Although neck dissection is a reliable and safe procedure, it can determine a significant morbidity involving a variety of structures of nervous, vascular and endocrine typology. A careful pre-operative study is therefore essential to better plan surgery. Surgical experience, combined with accurate surgical preparation and merged with adequate and specific techniques, can certainly help reduce the percentage of complications. In recent years, however, technology has also proved to be useful. Its crucial role was already recognized in the safeguard of the integrity of the laryngeal nerve through neuro-monitoring, but new technologies are emerging to help the preservation also of the parathyroid glands and other structures, such as the thoracic duct. These surgical skills combined with the latest technological advancements, that allow us to reduce the incidence of complications after neck dissection for thyroid cancer, will be reported in the present article. This topic is of significant interest for the endocrine and metabolic surgeons' community.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure (LHR) offers reduced morbidity compared with open Hartmann's reversal (OHR). The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients who underwent Hartmann reversal between January 2017 and July 2019 were evaluated. Patients underwent either LHR (n = 17) or OHR (n = 17). Variables such as numbers of patients, patient's age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) score, indication for previous open sigmoid resection, mean operation time, rate of conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay, mortality, and morbidity were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The two groups of patients were homogeneous for gender, age, body mass index, cause of primary surgery, time to reversal, and comorbidities. In 97% of the cases, HP was done by open surgery. Our data revealed no difference in mean operation time (LHR: 180.5 ± 35.1 vs. OHR: 225.2 ± 48.4) and morbidity rate, although, in OHR group, there were more severe complications. Less intraoperative blood loss (LHR: 100 ± 40 mL vs. OHR: 450 ± 125 mL; p value <0.001), shorter time to flatus (LHR: 2.4 days vs. OHR: 3.6 days; p value <0.021), and shorter hospitalization (LHR: 4.4 vs. OHR: 11.2 days; p value <0.001) were observed in the LHR group. Mortality rate was null in both groups. Discussion. LHR is feasible and safe even for patients who received a primary open Hartmann's procedure. We suggest careful patient's selection allowing LHR procedures to highly skilled laparoscopy surgeons.

Transduodenal surgical ampullectomy: a procedure that requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Trans-duodenal surgical ampullectomy (TSA) was first described in 1899. Nowadays its role in ampullary tumor surgery is still a matter of debate and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of TSA as a curative treatment for benign and selected malignant tumors arising from the ampulla in a single-institution experience. Sixteen patients with periampullary tumors that underwent TSA in our surgical units between January 2012 and January 2017 were included in the study. Patient demographic characteristics, pre or postoperative endoscopic interventions, operative procedures, postoperative morbidity and mortality, hospitalization, follow-up time, and quality of life questionnaire were analyzed. Mean operative time was 238.5 min (range 180-390), mean tumor size was 2.3 cm (range 1.5-3.9). The microscopic surgical outcome was R0 for 14 patients. The most frequent findings in terms of histological type were high-grade dysplasia/pTis (43.7%), low-grade dysplasia in 37.5% patients, invasive adenocarcinoma in 2 cases (12.5%), chronic inflammation in 1 case (6.3%). The readmission rate was 18.8% (3/16) and in 2 cases (12.5%) relaparotomy was required. The cumulative median duration of follow-up was 50 months (range 1-96). 90-days mortality was 6.2%. Mean hospital stay was 12 days (range 8-60). Our results confirm that TSA offers good results in terms of morbidity and mortality; still, it remains a challenging procedure that requires particular surgical experience and operative skills. A pre-operative planning in a multidisciplinary board should be carried out prior to the procedure.