Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pituitary ; 2024 Jul 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967764

RESUMO

An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic was the disruption of healthcare systems, especially surgical services provided to the community. Pituitary surgery was especially impacted, given the majority of cases were deemed non-urgent with very few exceptions, and the high risk of viral transmission conferred by the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Patients suffering from pituitary lesions with resultant endocrinopathy or visual symptoms saw their treatment delayed or altered, which had implications on their outcomes and care. This disruption extended to surgical training and the usual functioning of academic units, necessitating changes to curricula and implementation of novel methods of progressing surgical education. This review will explore the effect of the COVID pandemic on pituitary surgery, the experiences of various surgeons as well as the adaptations implemented on the frontlines. The lessons learned from the experience of the pandemic may assist specialists in gleaning insights regarding the care of patients in the future.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888301

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical evacuation with placement of a postoperative drain is the standard treatment for symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Subdural and subgaleal drains are equally effective after burrhole craniostomy, but the optimal location of the drain after craniotomy is not clear. We sought to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of subdural and subgaleal drain placement in patients undergoing minicraniotomy for cSDH. METHODS: A retrospective review of 137 consecutive patients undergoing minicraniotomy for cSDH at a single institution was performed. Cases were stratified by location of postoperative drain. The primary outcome was change in functional status (modified Rankin Score, mRS) at 3 months from preoperative baseline. RESULTS: Among the patient cohort, 24.6% received subgaleal drain placement. After a median follow-up of 105 days, 79.4% (27/34) in the subgaleal group and 57.3% (59/103) in the subdural group (P = .02) had been discharged home. Worse premorbid mRS (P = .002), subdural drain location (P = .004), and decreased consciousness at presentation (Glasgow Coma Scale<15) (P < .002) were independent predictors of a discharge destination other than home. At the 3-month follow-up, the subgaleal group exhibited a mean improvement of 0.77 ± 1.2 points, while the subdural group had a deterioration of 0.14 ± 0.8 points (P < .01). Subgaleal drain location (P < .0001), better preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (P = .01), and worse premorbid mRS (P = .0003) were independent predictors of improved mRS at 3 months. Recurrence requiring repeat surgery were more common in the subdural (13.6% (14/103) than the subgaleal 2.9% (1/34) group, P = .12), although the absolute incidence rates remained low. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing minicraniotomy for cSDH, subgaleal drains are associated with shorter hospitalization, greater chance of discharge home, and better functional outcomes than subdural drains.

3.
J Clin Neurosci ; 111: 32-36, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931065

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical fixation is widely practised in the management of spinal deformity. S1 screws are commonly incorporated in lumbosacral fusions and can be performed in both open and percutaneous techniques. However, their entry point is determined by the position of the pedicle as well as the posterior iliac interval (PII), as it creates an impedance for screw angulation. A wider angle screw has the potential to achieve a greater length and thus strength versus a narrow screw angle insertion due to risk of anterior breach. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive patients between July 2018 andDecember 2021 undergoing lumbo-sacral fusion with include S1 screw insertion from a single institution and surgeon. The age, screw angles, and the posterior iliac intervals were measured. RESULTS: The patients ranged from age 27 to 83 years old (mean 64.7) with a posterior iliac interval (PII) ranging from 7.76 to 12.62 cm (mean 10.24) and the average S1 screw angle on the right was 76.01 degrees (range 59.37 to 88.48) and on the left 74.37 degrees (range 59.75 to 87.47 degrees). Applying the Pearson Correlation co-efficient, a wider PII correlated with a more angulated screw entry (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: As expected, a wider PPI is significantly associated with a more angulated S1 screw trajectory and may have implication on patient biomechanics in lumbo-sacral fusion constructs.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Região Lombossacral/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos , Ílio/diagnóstico por imagem , Ílio/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Sacro/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...