Cutaneous melanoma survival rates of the elderly are not worse than those of the young, yet they have some specific differences.

Introduction: The incidence of cutaneous melanoma among the elderly has increased significantly. Unfavorable survival rates are associated with insufficient patient managements and poor prognostic features in the elderly. We aimed to compare elderly (≥75 years) and younger (<75 years) patients with cutaneous melanoma to determine the differences and the prognostic significance of age. Materials and Methods: The retrospective data of 117 elderly and 232 younger patients with cutaneous melanoma were compared. Results: The median age of the elderly patients was 78 years (75-104), and 51.3% of the patients were female. Of the patients, 14.5% were in the metastatic stages. Clinicopathologic factors such as extremity melanomas (P = 0.01), Clark levels IV-V (P = 0.04), ulceration (P = 0.009), and neurotropism (P = 0.03) were significantly more common in elderly patients. However, BRAF mutation was significantly more common in younger patients (P = 0.003). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of both the groups were similar. Lymph node involvement (P < 0.005), distant metastasis (P < 0.005), and relapse of disease (P = 0.02) were associated with poor OS in elderly patients. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was associated with prolonged RFS (P = 0.05), while extremity melanomas (P = 0.01), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.006), and lymph node involvement (P < 0.005) had negative impact on RFS. Conclusions: Although elderly patients with cutaneous melanoma had different clinicopathologic features in our series, their survival rates are similar to those of younger patients, which shows that age alone is inadequate to determine the prognosis. Disease stage and a comprehensive geriatric assessment might assist to determine appropriate management.

Clinical significance of serum tenascin-c levels in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Tenascin-C (TNC) is an extracellular matrix protein that is expressed at low levels in normal adult tissue but is highly expressed around many tumors including ovarian tumors. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical significance of the serum levels of TNC in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. A total of 50 patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of EOC were included in this study. Serum TNC levels were determined by the solid-phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Age- and sex- matched 28 healthy controls were included in the analysis. Median age of the patients was 56.5 years old, range 22 to 83 years. Majority of the patients had advanced disease (FIGO stage III-IV) (90 %). The median serum TNC levels were found significantly higher in EOC patients (130.5 pg/mL) compared to healthy controls (90.1 pg/mL) (p = 0.03). We found no correlation between serum TNC levels and any prognostic parameters analyzed, including age of the patients, histology, tumor grade, stage of the disease, and response to chemotherapy. Survival analysis did not show statistically significant effect of serum TNC concentration on progression-free and overall survival (p = 0.36 and p = 0.19, respectively). However, patients with high serum TNC levels tend to have poor overall survival. In conclusion, although serum TNC levels are elevated, it has no predictive or prognostic roles on survival in EOC patients.