Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Clin Psychiatry ; 32(4): 239-248, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33125448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has demonstrated fewer cognitive side effects than electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in antidepressant efficacy trials. However, there are no effectiveness trials examining antidepressant efficacy and cognitive side effects against ECT. The aims of this study were to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of MST vs ECT in major depressive disorder (MDD), and compare the cognitive side effects of MST and ECT. METHODS: In this open-label study, patients were assigned to either ECT or high-dose MST twice a week for 5 sessions based on the clinician's and the patient's decision-making. Efficacy was primarily assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 (HAMD-21); cognitive side effects were assessed by time to reorientation (TRO) and cognitive battery. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. Efficacy was similar between those assigned to MST (n = 30) and ECT (n = 30). Post-treatment HAMD-21 mean scores were 12.33 after MST, 12.80 after bitemporal (BT) ECT (n = 15), and 27.93 after right unilateral (RUL) ECT (n = 15). Magnetic seizure therapy had a significantly faster TRO of 1.8 minutes (standard deviation [SD] = 0.37) compared with ECT (RUL: 18.9 minutes [SD = 8.25]; BT: 50.2 minutes [SD = 5.89]) and had fewer cognitive side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic seizure therapy was effective for the treatment of MDD in real-world clinical care, with fewer cognitive side effects than ECT. Future studies are warranted to replicate these findings.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Estimulação Elétrica , Eletroconvulsoterapia , Fenômenos Magnéticos , Convulsões , Adulto , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Neuropsicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Convulsões/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 23(3): 288-292, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687084

RESUMO

Background: The anatomical changes associated with lung surgeries may decrease cardiac output and heart function. Therefore, monitoring of cardiac output (CO) is of significant value in these patients for clinical decision-making. Objective: This study is to evaluate the reliability of electrical cardiometry (EC) for the noninvasive continuous determination of CO after lobectomy or pneumonectomy compared to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Patients and Methods: This study was carried out on 60 patients, age ≥18 years scheduled for elective lung surgery (lobectomy or pneumonectomy). All patients underwent simultaneous measurement by EC using the ICON_ device and by TTE by measuring left ventricle outflow tract diameter (LVOT) and velocity time integral (VTI). Heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume index (SVI), CO, and cardiac index (CI) were measured 1 day before the surgery and 7 days after the surgery. Results: There was no significant difference between TTE and EC regarding preoperative and postoperative HR, SV, SVI, CO, and CI. There was a strong positive correlation between TTE and EC as regard preoperative and postoperative HR, SV, SVI, CO, and CI. Bland and Altman analysis showed low bias with accepted limits of agreement of HR, SV, SVI, CO, and CI. Postoperative readings showed a significant increase in HR and a significant decrease in SV and CO (either by TTE or EC), SBP, and DBP as compared to preoperative reading. Conclusion: Compared to the TTE, EC provides accurate and reliable CO, SV, and HR measurements before and even after lung surgeries.


Assuntos
Débito Cardíaco/fisiologia , Cardiografia de Impedância/métodos , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Pulmão/cirurgia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Egito , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Volume Sistólico
3.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 23(2): 154-160, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32275028

RESUMO

Introduction: High thoracic epidural (HTE) may reduce perioperative tachyarrhythmias, respiratory complications and myocardial ischemia (MI) and it may increase coronary perfusion and myocardial oxygen balance through sympatholysis and pain control. The aim of this study is to investigate the benefit of HTE in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) alone or in addition to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 80 patients (40 with increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and 40 with normal LVMI) who were equally randomised (n = 40) to receive either GA with HTE (HTE group) or GA alone (GA group). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and the incidence of ischemic ECG changes were recorded. LV functions (preoperative and postoperative by transthoracic echocardiography and intraoperative by transoesophageal echocardiography) were measured preoperative, intraoperative and till 48 H postoperative. Results: There was no significant difference in the baseline values of all measurements. HR and MAP were lower, and LV functions were improved in HTE group intraoperatively and postoperatively. Ischemic ECG changes were significantly lower in HTE group; with 42.9% intraoperative risk reduction (95% CI: 0.195-0.943) and 46.6% postoperative risk reduction (95% CI 0.227-0.952) as compared to GA group. The risk of ischemia was significantly higher in patients with increased LVMI in GA group (2.25 times compared to normal LVMI patients with 95% CI: 1.195-4.236), but it wasn't increased in HTE group. LV functions were significantly improved from the induction to 48 H postoperative in HTE group as compared to GA group. Conclusion: HTE reduced the incidence of MI and improved the LV function, even with increased LVM, in patients undergoing AVR alone or in addition to CABG.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Ventrículos do Coração/patologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Idoso , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Tamanho do Órgão , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 23(2): 149-153, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32275027

RESUMO

Background: Blood transfusion is not without harm, and recent studies suggest association between transfusion and poor outcome in critically ill patients. Although it is prescribed for many reasons based on the firm belief that blood transfusion improves oxygen carrying capacity, it carries notable adverse hazards. Importantly, lung surgeries are counted as moderate to high-risk operations and take a significant risk of blood loss. Aim: This study aims to reveal the association between blood transfusion and poor clinical outcomes and characterize the epidemiology of blood transfusion after pediatric chest surgery. Settings and Design: Retrospective cohort study, done throughout 3 years. Materials and Methods: A total of 248 patients who underwent open thoracotomy and lung surgery and aged ≤18 years were classified according to the need of intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion into two groups: Group I (non-transfused = 130) and Group II (transfused = 118). Statistical Analysis: SPSS v25 was used for analysis. Results: Transfusion probability ranged between 42.8% and 50% according to type of surgery. As regard to postoperative variables, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the duration of analgesia, allergic reactions, need of re-operation and in-hospital mortality. However, transfused group showed significant increase in duration of antibiotic, persistent postoperative fever, time to remove chest drains, ICU stays, hospital stay and pneumonia. Incidence of pneumonia had a relative risk 1.82 with transfused compared to non-transfused group. Conclusion: Transfusion group in pediatrics undergoing lung surgeries in our study was more prone to adverse outcomes such as pneumonia, delayed time to remove chest drains, prolonged ICU stay, and hospital stay.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Pulmão/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pediatria , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Saudi J Anaesth ; 5(4): 371-5, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22144923

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although nalbuphine was studied extensively in labour analgesia and was proved to be acceptable analgesics during delivery, its use as premedication before induction of general anesthesia for cesarean section is not studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nalbuphine given before induction of general anesthesia for cesarean section on quality of general anesthesia, maternal stress response, and neonatal outcome. METHODS: Sixty full term pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section, randomly classified into two equal groups, group N received nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg diluted in 10 ml of normal saline (n=30), and group C placebo (n=30) received 10 ml of normal saline 1 min before the induction of general anesthesia. Maternal heart rate and blood pressure were measured before, after induction, during surgery, and after recovery. Neonates were assisted by using APGAR0 scores, time to sustained respiration, and umbilical cord blood gas analysis. RESULT: Maternal heart rate showed significant increase in control group than nalbuphine group after intubation (88.2±4.47 versus 80.1±4.23, P<0.0001) and during surgery till delivery of baby (90.8±2.39 versus 82.6±2.60, P<0.0001) and no significant changes between both groups after delivery. MABP increased in control group than nalbuphine group after intubation (100.55±6.29 versus 88.75±6.09, P<0.0001) and during surgery till delivery of baby (98.50±2.01 versus 90.50±2.01, P<0.0001) and no significant changes between both groups after delivery. APGAR score was significantly low at one minute in nalbuphine group than control group (6.75±2.3, 8.5±0.74, respectively, P=0.0002) (27% of nalbuphine group APGAR score ranged between 4-6, while 7% in control group APGAR score ranged between 4-6 at one minute). All neonates at five minutes showed APGAR score ranged between 9-10. Time to sustained respiration was significantly longer in nalbuphine group than control group (81.8±51.4 versus 34.9±26.2 seconds, P<0.0001). The umbilical cord blood gas was comparable in both groups. None of the neonates need opioid antagonist (naloxone) or endotracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Administration of nalbuphine before cesarean section under general anesthesia reduces maternal stress response related to intubation and surgery, but decreases the APGAR score at one minute after delivery. So, when nalbuphine was used, all measures for neonatal monitoring and resuscitation must be available including attendance of a pediatrician.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...