Calciphylaxis in uraemic and nonuraemic settings: clinical risk factors and histopathological findings.

BACKGROUND: Calciphylaxis is a life-threatening cutaneous ulcerative/necrotic disease characterized by vascular calcification/occlusion. It occurs most commonly in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), known as uraemic calciphylaxis (UC) but can also occur in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and normal kidney function (nonuraemic calciphylaxis; NUC). There are few large series of NUC in the literature. AIM: To compare the clinicopathological features of UC and NUC. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the clinicopathological features of 35 patients with NUC during the period 2010-2020 with those of 53 patients with UC (control group). Cases were classified as NUC in the absence of all of the following: ESKD, significant CKD (defined as serum creatinine > 3 mg/dL or creatinine clearance < 15 mL/min) and acute kidney injury requiring kidney replacement therapy or kidney transplantation. RESULTS: NUC represented 40% of the total cases, and there was a higher number of women (P < 0.01) and a higher median body mass index (P = 0.06) compared with the control UC group. Elevated parathyroid hormone was present in 44% of patients with NUC. Most of the tested patients were positive for lupus anticoagulants (56%). NUC biopsies showed a higher rate of extravascular calcium deposits (73% vs. 47%, P = 0.03). Dermal reactive vascular proliferation was the most common dermal change (32%). CONCLUSIONS: NUC is more common than previously reported and shows a higher predilection for obese postmenopausal women. Undiagnosed hyperparathyroidism shows a possible association with NUC. Lupus anticoagulants were positive in most patients. NUC biopsies are more likely than UC biopsies to display extravascular calcium deposition.

Incidence trends and mortality in end-stage renal disease attributed to renovascular disease in the United States.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) attributed to renovascular disease (RVD-ESRD) has been incompletely characterized. We determined incidence trends, clinical features, prior treatment, and survival of patients with RVD-ESRD using the US Renal Data System database. Primary causes of ESRD were assessed in patients starting ESRD therapy during 1991 to 1997. The incidence of RVD-ESRD increased from 2.9/10(6) per year (1.4% of new ESRD cases) to 6.1/10(6) per year (2.1%). The annualized increase was 12.4% per year. This is a greater rate of increase than for ESRD from diabetes mellitis (DM-ESRD; 8.3% per year) and ESRD overall (5.4% per year). The risk for RVD-ESRD versus other-cause ESRD correlated positively with age (odds ratio [OR], 1.7 per 10-year increment; P < 0.0001) and male sex (OR, 1.2; P < 0.0001) and negatively with black (OR, 0.17; P < 0.0001), Asian (OR, 0.29; P < 0.0001), and Native American race (OR, 0.31; P < 0.0001). The unadjusted prevalence of coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease was greater in patients with RVD-ESRD versus other-cause ESRD (P < 0.001). Of patients with RVD-ESRD, 5% underwent revascularization in the 2 years before ESRD compared with 0.5% of patients with other-cause ESRD, including DM-ESRD. Adjusted for age, race, sex, comorbidity, and laboratory values, the survival of patients with RVD-ESRD was similar to that for patients with other-cause ESRD (risk ratio, 1.01; P = 0.5). These findings suggest that RVD-ESRD is increasing faster than other-cause ESRD and is not independently associated with an increased mortality risk. Strategies may exist to prevent progression to ESRD and merit priority for further study.

Ultrasound detection of microembolic signals in hemodialysis accesses.

Microembolic signals (MES) detected by ultrasound, thought to be of gaseous or solid origin, have been described with decompression illness and in the intracranial and cardiopulmonary circulation. We describe the first reported cases of MES occurring in hemodialysis accesses. Two hemodialysis patients, one with a synthetic graft and one with an arteriovenous fistula, showed MES during a dialysis session detected by duplex ultrasound. We postulate that these MES represent cavitation bubbles developing from turbulent blood flow around the venous needle in the access. However, other potential causes exist, including air introduced into the circulation from the dialysis circuit or microemboli arising from thrombus or atheroma.