The usefulness of bioelectrical impedance analysis in differentiating dyspnea due to decompensated heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Acute dyspnea poses a diagnostic challenge for physicians, and the current methods in differentiating cardiac from non-cardiac causes have been limited to date. Recently, the brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) rapid test has been validated in the emergency room. Nevertheless, the early accumulation of fluid in the interstitial space in the body and in the lungs, which characterizes patients with ADHF, is well estimated by BIA. We investigate whether bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) can serve as a noninvasive diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 292 patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the ED were evaluated by using a conventional diagnostic strategy and rapid BNP measures. Segmental (Seg) and whole-body (WB) BIA resistance (Rz) and reactance (Xc) on entry were immediately detected. After hospital discharge, an expert team classified enrolled patients into ADHF and non-ADHF. A total of 58.9% of patients had ADHF, whereas 41.1% were non-ADHF. ADHF patients showed significantly (P < .001) higher BNP values (591.8 +/- 501 versus 69.5 +/- 42 pg/mL), a significant (P < .001) reduction of Seg (35.5 + 8.2 versus 66.4 + 10.5) and WB (402.3 + 55.5 versus 513.2 + 41.8) Rz (Ohm), and a significant correlation (P < .0001) between BNP and Seg (r = -0,62) and WB (r = -0.63) bioelectrical Rz was also identified. Multiple regression analysis revealed that whole body and segmental BIA were strong predictors of ADHF alone or in combination with BNP. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that Seg and WB BIA are a useful, simple, rapid, and noninvasive diagnostic adjunct in the early diagnosis of dyspnea from ADHF.

Effects of canrenoate plus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors alone on systolic and diastolic function in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Aldosterone (ALDO) exerts profibrotic effects, acting via the mineralocorticoid receptors in cardiovascular tissues. Aldosterone antagonism in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may better protect against the untoward effects of ALDO than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition alone. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized study, the tolerability and efficacy of canrenoate (25 mg/d) plus captopril versus captopril alone were evaluated in 510 patients with an acute anterior myocardial infarction (MI), a serum creatinine concentration < 2.0 mg/dL, and a serum potassium level < 5.0 mmol/L. Three hundred forty-one patients received captopril and 25-mg canrenoate (group A). Group B (346 patients) received captopril and placebo. At baseline and at 10, 90, and 180 days after admission, Doppler echocardiography was performed. RESULTS: Clinical and demographic aspects were similar in both groups. In addition, baseline cardiac enzyme levels, left ventricular function, and incidence of surgical interventions and angioplasty were comparable. Overall, creatinine, blood urea, and serum potassium levels did not show significant differences between groups. However, in 18 patients in group A, increases in serum potassium levels to > 5.5 mEq/L and creatinine levels to > 2.0 mg/L after 10 days of treatment were observed. At 180 days, the mitral E-wave-A-wave ratio was higher (P = .0001) and left ventricular end-systolic volume was smaller (P = .0001) in patients treated with canrenoate than in those receiving placebo. No further side effects were observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the combination of captopril plus canrenoate is well tolerated after an acute MI and has beneficial effect on systolic and diastolic parameters and may decrease post-MI remodeling.