Epilepsy classification using artificial intelligence: A web-based application.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current endeavor was to evaluate the feasibility of using easily accessible and applicable clinical information (based on history taking and physical examination) in order to make a reliable differentiation between idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) versus focal epilepsy using machine learning (ML) methods. METHODS: The first phase of the study was a retrospective study of a prospectively developed and maintained database. All patients with an electro-clinical diagnosis of IGE or focal epilepsy, at the outpatient epilepsy clinic at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, from 2008 until 2022, were included. The first author selected a set of clinical features. Using the stratified random portioning method, the dataset was divided into the train (70%) and test (30%) subsets. Different types of classifiers were assessed and the final classification was made based on their best results using the stacking method. RESULTS: A total number of 1445 patients were studied; 964 with focal epilepsy and 481 with IGE. The stacking classifier led to better results than the base classifiers in general. This algorithm has the following characteristics: precision: 0.81, sensitivity: 0.81, and specificity: 0.77. SIGNIFICANCE: We developed a pragmatic algorithm aimed at facilitating epilepsy classification for individuals whose epilepsy begins at age 10 years and older. Also, in order to enable and facilitate future external validation studies by other peers and professionals, the developed and trained ML model was implemented and published via an online web-based application that is freely available at http://www.epiclass.ir/f-ige.

Noisy Neonatal Chest Sound Separation for High-Quality Heart and Lung Sounds.

Stethoscope-recorded chest sounds provide the opportunity for remote cardio-respiratory health monitoring of neonates. However, reliable monitoring requires high-quality heart and lung sounds. This paper presents novel artificial intelligence-based Non-negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF) and Non-negative Matrix Co-Factorisation (NMCF) methods for neonatal chest sound separation. To assess these methods and compare them with existing single-channel separation methods, an artificial mixture dataset was generated comprising heart, lung, and noise sounds. Signal-to-noise ratios were then calculated for these artificial mixtures. These methods were also tested on real-world noisy neonatal chest sounds and assessed based on vital sign estimation error, and a signal quality score of 1-5, developed in our previous works. Overall, both the proposed NMF and NMCF methods outperform the next best existing method by 2.7 dB to 11.6 dB for the artificial dataset, and 0.40 to 1.12 signal quality improvement for the real-world dataset. The median processing time for the sound separation of a 10 s recording was found to be 28.3 s for NMCF and 342 ms for NMF. With the stable and robust performance of our proposed methods, we believe these methods are useful to denoise neonatal heart and lung sounds in the real-world environment.

A New Non-Negative Matrix Co-Factorisation Approach for Noisy Neonatal Chest Sound Separation.

Obtaining high quality heart and lung sounds enables clinicians to accurately assess a newborns cardio-respiratory health and provide timely care. However, noisy chest sound recordings are common, hindering timely and accurate assessment. A new Non-negative Matrix Co-Factorisation based approach is proposed to separate noisy chest sound recordings into heart, lung and noise components to address this problem. This method is achieved through training with 20 high quality heart and lung sounds, in parallel with separating the sounds of the noisy recording. The method was tested on 68 10-second noisy recordings containing both heart and lung sounds and compared to the current state of the art Non-negative Matrix Factorisation methods. Results show significant improvements in heart and lung sound quality scores respectively, and improved accuracy of 3.6bpm and 1.2bpm in heart and breathing rate estimation respectively, when compared to existing methods.

Neonatal Heart and Lung Sound Quality Assessment for Robust Heart and Breathing Rate Estimation for Telehealth Applications.

With advances in digital stethoscopes, internet of things, signal processing and machine learning, chest sounds can be easily collected and transmitted to the cloud for remote monitoring and diagnosis. However, low quality of recordings complicates remote monitoring and diagnosis, particularly for neonatal care. This paper proposes a new method to objectively and automatically assess the signal quality to improve the accuracy and reliability of heart rate (HR) and breathing rate (BR) estimation from noisy neonatal chest sounds. A total of 88 10-second long chest sounds were taken from 76 preterm and full-term babies. Six annotators independently assessed the signal quality, number of detectable beats, and breathing periods from these recordings. For quality classification, 187 and 182 features were extracted from heart and lung sounds, respectively. After feature selection, class balancing, and hyperparameter optimization, a dynamic binary classification model was trained. Then HR and BR were automatically estimated from the chest sound and several approaches were compared.The results of subject-wise leave-one-out cross-validation, showed that the model distinguished high and low quality recordings in the test set with 96% specificity, 81% sensitivity and 93% accuracy for heart sounds, and 86% specificity, 69% sensitivity and 82% accuracy for lung sounds. The HR and BR estimated from high quality sounds resulted in significantly less median absolute error (4 bpm and 12 bpm difference, respectively) compared to those from low quality sounds. The methods presented in this work, facilitates automated neonatal chest sound auscultation for future telehealth applications.

Acoustic analysis of neonatal breath sounds using digital stethoscope technology.

BACKGROUND: There is no published literature regarding the use of the digital stethoscope (DS) and computerized breath sound analysis in neonates, despite neonates experiencing a high burden of respiratory disease. We aimed to determine if the DS could be used to study breath sounds of term and preterm neonates without respiratory disease, and detect a difference in acoustic characteristics between them. METHODS: A commercially available DS was used to record breath sounds of term and preterm neonates not receiving respiratory support between 24 and 48 hours after birth. Recordings were extracted, filtered, and computer analysis performed to obtain power spectra and mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) profiles. RESULTS: Recordings from 26 term and 26 preterm infants were obtained. The preterm cohort had an average gestational age (median and interquartile range) of 32 (31-33) weeks and term 39 (38-39) weeks. Birth weight (mean and SD) was 1767 (411) g for the preterm and 3456 (442) g for the term cohort. Power spectra demonstrated the greatest power in the low-frequency range of 100 to 250 Hz for both groups. There were significant differences (P < .05) in the average power at low (100-250 Hz), medium (250-500 Hz), high (500-1000 Hz), and very high (1000-2000 Hz) frequency bands. MFCC profiles also demonstrated significant differences between groups (P < .05). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to use DS technology to analyze breath sounds in neonates. DS was able to determine significant differences between the acoustic characteristics of term and preterm infants breathing in room air. Further investigation of DS technology for neonatal breath sounds is warranted.