Pragmatic study of a thromboprophylaxis algorithm in critically ill patients with SARS-COV-2 infection.

The optimal thromboprophylactic strategy for patients affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been debated among experts. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a thromboprophylaxis algorithm. This was a retrospective, single-center study in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (University affiliated Hospital) for acute respiratory failure due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). From March 16 to April 9, 2020, thromboprophylaxis was adjusted according to weight (control group, n = 19) and after this date, thromboprophylaxis depended on an algorithm based on thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk factors (protocol group, n = 13). With regard to safety (number of major bleeding events and blood transfusions), the groups were not significantly different. With regard to efficacy, the number of thrombotic events decreased from 37 to 0%, p = 0.025 after implementation of the algorithm. Also, peak fibrinogen dropped from 8.6 (7.2-9.3) to 6.5 (4.6-8.4) g/L, p = 0.041 and D-dimers from 2194 (1464-3763) to 1486 (900-2582) ng/mL, p = 0.0001. In addition, length of stay declined from 19 (10-31) to 5 (3-19) days, p = 0.009. In conclusion, a tailored thromboprophylaxis algorithm (risk stratification based on clinical parameters and biological markers) reduce thrombotic phenomena in critically ill COVID-19 patients without increasing major bleeding.

Recombinant activated factor VII decreases bleeding without increasing arterial thrombosis in rabbits.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in an experimental model of bleeding and arterial thrombosis. METHODS: The Folts model was used in 60 rabbits. After anesthesia, the carotid artery was exposed and a 75% stenosis was induced. A compression injury of the artery triggered a series of cyclic flow reductions (CFRs). After counting baseline CFRs, animals were assigned randomly to one of four groups (n = 15 in each): control, PRP, rFVIIa and placebo. Control animals received 10 mL.kg(-1) of saline while 10 mL.kg(-1) of a hydroxyethyl starch solution (200,000/6%/0.5) were infused in the three other groups. CFRs were measured again, followed by treatment with PRP, rFVIIa or placebo and by a final measurement of CFRs. At the end of each observation period, an ear immersion bleeding time (BT) was measured and a blood sample was drawn for the evaluation of hematological variables. Microvascular bleeding was evaluated at the end of the experiment in grams of blood shed from liver and spleen sections. Results are presented as median (range). RESULTS: rFVIIa shortened the BT and decreased microvascular bleeding as compared with placebo [60 (35-100) sec vs 110 (50-140) sec, P = 0.0019 and 9 (4-24) g vs 17 (5-28) g, P = 0.002, respectively]. rFVIIa did not increase CFRs [3(0-9) vs |(0-5), P = 0.11]. CONCLUSION: rFVIIa led to a decrease in BT and microvascular bleeding but did not significantly affect arterial thrombosis in rabbits.