Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
2.
3.
AMA J Ethics ; 18(10): 993-1002, 2016 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27780023

RESUMO

Students with sensory and physical disabilities are underrepresented in medical schools despite the availability of assistive technologies and accommodations. Unfortunately, many medical schools have adopted restrictive "organic" technical standards based on deficits rather than on the ability to do the work. Compelling ethical considerations of justice and beneficence should prompt change in this arena. Medical schools should instead embrace "functional" technical standards that permit accommodations for disabilities and update their admissions policies to promote applications from qualified students with disabilities. Medical schools thus should focus on what students with disabilities can do, rather than what they cannot do, because these students further diversify the health care profession and improve our ability to care for an expanding population of patients with disabilities.


Assuntos
Beneficência , Pessoas com Deficiência , Educação Médica/ética , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Faculdades de Medicina , Justiça Social , Estudantes de Medicina , Avaliação da Deficiência , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Discriminação Social
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 44(12): 1622-1627, 2016 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27492790

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a challenge in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). The objective of this study was to demonstrate that a novel, minimally invasive program not interfering with activities of daily living or socialization could lower methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) disease. METHODS: This was a prospective, cluster-randomized, nonblinded trial initiated at 3 LTCFs. During year 1, units were stratified by type of care and randomized to intervention or control. In year 2, all units were converted to intervention consisting of universal decolonization using intranasal mupirocin and a chlorhexidine bath performed twice (2 decolonization-bathing cycles 1 month apart) at the start of the intervention period. Subsequently, after initial decolonization, all admissions were screened on site using real-time polymerase chain reaction, and those MRSA positive were decolonized, but not isolated. Units received annual instruction on hand hygiene. Enhanced bleach wipe cleaning of flat surfaces was done every 4 months. RESULTS: There were 16,773 tests performed. The MRSA infection rate decreased 65% between baseline (44 infections during 365,809 patient days) and year 2 (12 infections during 287,847 patient days; P <.001); a significant reduction was observed at each of the LTCFs (P <.03). CONCLUSIONS: On-site MRSA surveillance with targeted decolonization resulted in a significant decrease in clinical MRSA infection among LTCF residents.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Humanos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Socialização , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(10 Suppl): S269-73, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25239721

RESUMO

We tested infection prevention strategies to limit exposure of long-term care facility residents to drug-resistant pathogens in a prospective, cluster randomized 2-year trial involving 3 long-term care facilities (LTCFs) using methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a model. We hypothesized that nasal MRSA surveillance using rapid quantitative polymerase chain reaction and decolonization of carriers would successfully lower overall MRSA colonization. In year 1, randomly assigned intervention units received decolonization with nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing and enhanced environmental cleaning with bleach every 4 months. Newly admitted MRSA nares-positive residents were decolonized on admission. Control units were screened but not decolonized. All units received periodic bleach environmental cleaning and instruction on hand hygiene. In year 2, all units followed intervention protocol caused by failure of the cluster randomized approach to sufficiently segregate patients. MRSA colonization was monitored using point prevalence testing every 4-6 months. Colonization status at admission and discharge was performed 1 quarter per year to determine acquisition. Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis. Baseline MRSA colonization rate was 16.64%. In year 1, the colonization rate of intervention units was 11.61% (P = .028) and 17.85% in control units (P = .613) compared with baseline. Intervention unit rate difference compared with the controls was significant (P = .001). In year 2, the colonization rate was 10.55% (P < .001) compared with baseline. The transmission rates were 1.66% and 3.52% in years 1 and 2, respectively (P = .034). The planned interventions of screening and decolonization were successful at lowering MRSA colonization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Desinfetantes/farmacologia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Assistência de Longa Duração , Mupirocina/farmacologia , Nariz/microbiologia , Casas de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão
6.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 137(5): 778-84, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22523217

RESUMO

Reducing health care-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a National Patient Safety Goal. The purpose of this investigation was to establish a colony count threshold to predict clinically significant UTIs that develop in hospitalized patients. A total of 185 cases were reviewed sequentially by 2 physicians. The information extracted included subjective complaints, presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, clinical signs and symptoms, WBC count, urinalysis, and urine culture results. The first reviewer recorded whether the patient was diagnosed and treated for a UTI by the clinician. The second reviewer determined if the patient met National Healthcare Safety Network guidelines for nosocomial UTI. Compared with patients with colony counts less than 100,000 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL), patients with colony counts 100,000 CFU/mL or more were 73.86 times more likely to have a clinically significant UTI (odds ratio, 73.86; 95% confidence interval, 24.23 ∼ 225.15; P < .0001; c-statistic, 0.859). Reporting positive results only for patients with 100,000 CFU/mL or more would have reduced the number of positive cultures by 38%. These data suggest that reporting colony counts less than 100,000 CFU/mL encourages treatment of non-clinically significant UTIs in hospitalized patients, causing inappropriate antibiotic use.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Urinálise/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/urina , Hospitalização , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/urina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...