A quality-improvement approach to effective trauma team activation

Background: Appropriate, timely trauma team activation (TTA) can directly affect outcomes for patients with trauma. A review of quality-performance indicators at our Canadian level 1 trauma centre showed a high level of undertriage, with TTA compliance rates less than 60% for major trauma. A quality-improvement project was undertaken, targeting a sustained goal of at least 90% TTA compliance based on Accreditation Canada guidelines. Methods: Quality-improvement action followed a well-defined process. Baseline data collection was performed, and, in keeping with the Donabedian approach, we brought together stakeholders to collectively review and understand the reasons behind poor TTA compliance; and root-cause analysis. This was followed by rapid change cycles that focused on structure and processes with ongoing audits to support and sustain change. Results: Trauma team activation compliance improved from 58.8% to more than 90% over 2 years. Quality indicators showed a statistically significant reduction in the time to computed tomography scanner, time in the acute care region of the emergency department and total time in the emergency department, with improved TTA compliance. Conclusion: Compliance with TTA protocols improved to more than 90% over a 2-year period, which shows the benefit of having a clearly outlined qualityimprovement process. This well-defined quality-improvement method provides a framework for use by other institutions that seek to improve their processes of trauma care, including activation rates.

Contexte: Le déploiement rapide et approprié de l'équipe de traumatologie (DÉT) peut avoir une influence directe sur les résultats chez les polytraumatisés. Une revue des indicateurs de qualité/performance dans notre centre de traumatologie canadien de niveau 1 a révélé une lacune importante au plan du triage, et des taux de conformité aux protocoles de DÉT atteignant moins de 60 % pour les traumatismes majeurs. Un projet d'amélioration de la qualité a donc été entrepris avec pour objectif une conformité soutenue d'au moins 90 % aux protocoles de DÉT selon les lignes directrices d'Agrément Canada. Méthodes: Les mesures d'amélioration de la qualité ont suivi un processus bien défini. Une collecte des données de référence a été effectuée, et conformément au modèle de Donabedian, nous avons réuni les différentes parties intéressées pour revoir et comprendre ensemble les raisons de la piètre conformité aux protocoles de DÉT et procéder à leur analyse en profondeur. On a ensuite appliqué des cycles de changements rapides axés sur la structure et les procédés, accompagnés de vérifications en continu pour les appuyer et les maintenir. Résultats: La conformité aux protocoles de déploiement de l'équipe de traumatologie s'est améliorée, passant de 58,8 % à plus de 90 % en l'espace de 2 ans. Les indicateurs de qualité ont montré des réductions statistiquement significatives du délai prétomographie, du temps passé dans la section de soins aigus du service des urgences et du temps total passé aux urgences, de même qu'une meilleure conformité aux protocoles de DÉT. Conclusion: La conformité aux protocoles de DÉT s'est améliorée pour dépasser les 90 % en l'espace de 2 ans, ce qui montre l'efficacité d'un processus d'amélioration de la qualité clairement défini. Cette méthode d'amélioration de la qualité bien définie fournit un cadre que d'autres établissements peuvent appliquer s'ils cherchent à améliorer leurs protocoles de traumatologie, y compris la vitesse de leur déploiement.

High-risk medications in older patients with trauma: a cross-sectional study of risk mitigation

Background: The Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use inOlder Adults is a framework that can assess the nature of high-risk medication use. The objective of this study was to use the Beers Criteria to assess the prevalence and nature of polypharmacy, the magnitude of medication changes during the hospital stay and the impact of Beers Criteria medications on outcomes in older patients with trauma. Methods: We used the Alberta Trauma Registry to conduct a retrospective review of patients aged 65 years or older with major trauma (Injury Severity Score ≥ 12) who were admitted to a level 1 trauma centre between January 2013 and December 2014. We analyzed changes in medication prescriptions during the hospital stay using descriptive statistics and assessed the association between Beers Criteria medications and relevant outcomes using multivariable regression analysis. Results: There was no significant change in the number of Beers Criteria medications prescribed before and after admission. The adjusted odds ratio for 30-day mortality for each additional Beers Criteria medication prescribed was 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16­3.51) versus 1.24 (95% CI 1.04­1.59) for each additional medication of any type. The corresponding adjusted incidence rate ratios for length of stay were 1.15 (95% CI 1.03­1.30) versus 1.05 (95% CI 1.01­1.10). Conclusion: Beers Criteria medications were not discontinued during trauma admissions. Using the Beers Criteria as a process indicator for quality improvement in trauma care may provide interdisciplinary trauma teams an opportunity to audit patient medications and stop potentially harmful medications in a vulnerable population.

Contexte: Les critères de Beers sur les médicaments potentiellement inappropriés chez les adultes âgés constituent un cadre qui permet d'évaluer la nature d'une pharmacothérapie à risque élevé. L'objectif de cette étude était d'utiliser les critères de Beers pour évaluer la prévalence et la nature de la polypharmacologie, l'ampleur des changements de prescriptions en cours d'hospitalisation et l'impact des médicaments potentiellement inappropriés sur l'évolution de l'état de personnes âgées victimes de traumatismes. Méthodes: Nous avons utilisé le Registre albertain des traumatismes pour procéder à une revue rétrospective des patients de 65 ans et plus victimes d'un traumatisme grave (indice de gravité des blessures ≥ 12) admis dans un centre de traumatologie entre janvier 2013 et décembre 2014. Nous avons analysé les changements de médicaments prescrits durant le séjour hospitalier au moyen de statistiques descriptives et nous avons évalué le lien entre les médicaments potentiellement inappropriés et les variables pertinentes au moyen d'une analyse de régression multivariée. Résultats: On n'a noté aucun changement significatif entre les médicaments potentiellement inappropriés prescrits avant et après l'admission. Le rapport des cotes ajusté pour la mortalité à 30 jours pour chaque médicament potentiellement inapproprié prescrit a été de 2,02 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % 1,16­3,51) contre 1,24 (IC à 95 % 1,04­1,59) pour chaque médicament additionnel, de tout type. Les rapports des taux d'incidence ajustés correspondants pour la durée de l'hospitalisation ont été de 1,15 (IC à 95 % 1,03­1,30) contre 1,05 (IC à 95 % 1,01­1,10). Conclusion: Les médicaments potentiellement inappropriés (selon les critères de Beers) n'ont pas été cessés durant les admissions pour traumatisme. L'utilisation des critères de Beers comme indicateur de processus pour l'amélioration de la qualité des soins en traumatologie pourrait fournir aux équipes interdisciplinaires une occasion de vérifier les médicaments prescrits et de cesser ceux qui sont nuisibles à une population vulnérable.

Ensuring adequate vascular access in patients with major trauma: a quality improvement initiative.

Ensuring adequate vascular access in major trauma patients prior to decompensative physiological processes is crucial to patient outcomes. Most protocols suggest achieving two 18-gauge or larger intravenous lines immediately in patients with major trauma. We discuss a quality improvement approach to ensure that >90% of patients with major trauma (as defined by an injury severity score ≥12) at a level one trauma centre receive timely and adequate fluid access. Applying Donabedian principles for process improvement, we used the Alberta Trauma Registry to perform a 4-month chart audit on patients with major trauma at the University of Alberta Hospital. Background data were supported with a formal root cause analysis to outline the problems and generate plan, do, study and act (PDSA) rapid change cycles. These PDSA cycles were then implemented over the course of 2 months to alter system and personnel barriers to care, thereby ensuring that patients with major trauma received adequate vascular access for fluid resuscitation. This was followed by a 6-month sustainability assessment. The percentage of patients with major trauma who received adequate fluid access went from a mean of 55.5% to >90% in 2 months and was sustained at or greater than 90% for 6 consecutive months. The formal application of quality improvement processes is uncommon in trauma care but is much needed to ensure success and sustainability of quality initiatives. Planning including engagement and prechange awareness is crucial to staff engagement, change, and sustainment. Formal quality improvement and change management techniques can elicit rapid and sustainable changes in trauma care. We provide a framework for change to increase compliance with fluid access in patients with major trauma.

Facility-Level Factors and Outcomes After Skilled Nursing Facility Admission for Trauma and Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) have worse outcomes than those discharged to home, but whether this is due to differences in facility-level factors in addition to patient characteristics is not known. We aimed to determine whether SNF-level factors including nurse staffing and patient density are associated with outcomes after acute hospitalization for trauma or surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: Retrospective study of patients discharged to Medicare-certified SNFs after trauma or major surgery from 2007 to 2009. We measured the ratio of beds per nurse and the proportion of trauma and surgery patients at each facility (density). Outcomes were 1-year mortality, hospital readmission, and failure to discharge home at first discharge disposition. RESULTS: For 389,133 patients (mean age 78 years, 63% female) admitted to 3707 SNFs, mortality was 26%, hospital readmission 26%, and failure to discharge home 44%. After adjusting for patient-level factors, SNFs with fewer beds per nurse had lower odds of mortality [odds ratio (OR): trauma 0.84; (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.91), surgery 0.80 (0.75-0.86)], readmission [OR: trauma 0.81 (0.74-0.88), surgery 0.71 (0.65-0.76)], and failure to discharge home [OR: trauma 0.82 [0.74-0.91], surgery 0.66 [0.60-0.72]). SNFs with greater density of specialty patients (>4.3% surgery, >14.1% trauma) had lower odds of readmission [OR: trauma 0.59 (0.53-0.66), surgery 0.62 (0.58-0.67)] and failure to discharge home [OR: trauma 0.48 (0.43-0.55), surgery 0.45 (0.42-0.49)]. CONCLUSIONS: There are modifiable SNF-level factors that influence long-term outcomes and may be targets for intervention. Staffing standardization and SNF specialization may reduce variation of quality in post-acute care.

Intentional injury and violence in Cape Town, South Africa: an epidemiological analysis of trauma admissions data.

BACKGROUND: Injury is a truly global health issue that has enormous societal and economic consequences in all countries. Interpersonal violence is now widely recognized as important global public health issues that can be addressed through evidence-based interventions. In South Africa, as in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), a lack of ongoing, systematic injury surveillance has limited the ability to characterize the burden of violence-related injury and to develop prevention programmes. OBJECTIVE: To describe the profile of trauma presenting to the trauma centre of Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa - relating to interpersonal violence, using data collected from a newly implemented surveillance system. Particular emphasis was placed on temporal aspects of injury epidemiology, as well as age and sex differentiation. DESIGN: Data were collected prospectively using a standardized trauma admissions form for all patients presenting to the trauma centre. An epidemiological analysis was conducted on 16 months of data collected from June 2010 to October 2011. RESULTS: A total of 8445 patients were included in the analysis, in which the majority were violence-related. Specifically, 35% of records included violent trauma and, of those, 75% of victims were male. There was a clear temporal pattern: a greater proportion of intentional injuries occur during the night, while unintentional injury peaks late in the afternoon. In total, two-third of all intentional trauma is inflicted on the weekends, as is 60% of unintentional trauma. Where alcohol was recorded in the record, 72% of cases involved intentional injury. Sex was again a key factor as over 80% of all records involving alcohol or substance abuse were associated with males. The findings highlighted the association between violence, young males, substance use, and weekends. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the basis for evidence-based interventions to reduce the burden of intentional injury. Furthermore, it demonstrates the value of locally appropriate, ongoing, systematic public health surveillance in LMIC.

Temporal trends in surgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury caused by extra-axial hemorrhage, 1995 to 2012.

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) caused by extra-axial hemorrhage has declined in recent decades. The effect of this change on patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the change over time in surgical intervention in this population and to assess changes in patient outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the Washington State Trauma Registry was queried from 1995 to 2012 for patients with extra-axial hemorrhage and head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 to 5. Data were linked to the state-wide death registry to analyze long-term mortality. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included 6- and 12-month mortality and modified Functional Independence Measure at discharge. Multivariable analyses were completed for all outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 22974 patients met inclusion criteria. Over the study period, surgical intervention for severe TBI declined from 36% to 7%. There was a decline in case fatality from 22% to 12%. In 2012, the relative risk of inpatient mortality was 23% lower compared with 1995 (adjusted mortality risk ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.94). Changes in 6- and 12-month adjusted mortality and modified Functional Independence Measure were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The decline in surgical intervention for severe TBI caused by extra-axial hemorrhage in Washington State was ubiquitous across regional, demographic, and injury characteristic strata. There was concurrently a reduction in inpatient mortality in this population. Functional status and long-term mortality, however, have remained the same. Future studies are needed to better identify modifiable risk factors for improvement in functional status and long-term mortality in this population.

Risk factors for unplanned readmissions in older adult trauma patients in Washington State: a competing risk analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission is a significant contributor to increasing health care use related to caring for older trauma patients. This study was undertaken with the following aims: determine the proportion of older adult trauma patients who experience unplanned readmission, as well as risk factors for these readmissions and identify the most common readmission diagnoses among these patients. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of trauma patients age 55 years and older who survived their hospitalization at a statewide trauma center between 2009 and 2010. Linking 3 statewide databases, nonelective readmission rates were calculated for 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after index discharge. Competing risk regression was used to determine risk factors for readmission and account for the competing risk of dying without first being readmitted. Subhazard ratios (SHR) are reported, indicating the relative risk of readmission by 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: The cumulative readmission rates for the 14,536 participants were 7.9%, 18.9%, and 25.2% at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. In multivariable models, the strongest risk factors for readmission at 1 year (based on magnitude of SHR) were severe head injury (adjusted SHR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.24-1.73) and disposition to a skilled nursing facility (SHR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.39-1.71). The diagnoses most commonly associated with readmission were atrial fibrillation, anemia, and congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this statewide study, unplanned readmissions after older adult trauma occurred frequently up to 1 year after discharge, particularly for patients who sustained severe head trauma and who could not be discharged home independently. Examining common readmission diagnoses might inform the development of interventions to prevent unplanned readmissions.

Pre-hospital aspiration is associated with increased pulmonary complications.

BACKGROUND: Rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are highest among patients intubated on an emergency basis following trauma. We reported previously a retrospective analysis demonstrating an association between subjective aspiration and VAP after pre-hospital intubation. We hypothesize that by directing paramedics to note features of aspiration at intubation, we will confirm prospectively the association between pre-hospital aspiration and subsequent pneumonia in trauma patients. METHODS: Paramedics collected data regarding aspiration at the time of intubation. All intubated patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Data comprised a clinical impression of pre-hospital aspiration, as well as the presence and timing of blood and emesis in the airway. Injury severity, co-morbidities, and outcomes were collected from the trauma registry. Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP) was identified by medical record review of both bronchoalveolar lavage culture results and discharge diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis of outcomes by aspiration status, as well as covariable adjustment using propensity scores, were performed. RESULTS: Of the 228 patients, 89 (39%) were determined by paramedics to have aspirated. The majority of those who aspirated (84 [94%]) did so prior to intubation. Patients who aspirated had higher Injury Severity Scores than those who did not aspirate (25.0 ± 1.7 vs. 21.9 ± 1.5 points; p=0.04) and lower preintubation Glasgow Coma Scale scores (8.2 ± 0.50 vs. 9.6 ± 0.40; p=0.02). Of the 89 patients who aspirated around the time of intubation, 14 (16%) developed HAP vs. five (3.6%) of those who did not aspirate (p<0.01). We observed non-significant increases in mortality rate, ICU length of stay (LOS) and duration of mechanical ventilation after aspiration (deaths: 21 [23.6%] vs. 23 [16.6%]; p=0.19; ICU LOS: 5.3 ± 0.9 vs. 4.1 ± 0.5 days; p=0.13; duration of mechanical ventilation: 5.3 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 0.5 days; p=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration prior to intubation was reported commonly by paramedics and was associated with a higher risk of HAP.

Trauma Surveillance in Cape Town, South Africa: An Analysis of 9236 Consecutive Trauma Center Admissions.

IMPORTANCE: Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In many low- and middle-income countries, formal trauma surveillance strategies have not yet been widely implemented. OBJECTIVE: To formalize injury data collection at Groote Schuur Hospital, the chief academic hospital of the University of Cape Town, a level I trauma center, and one of the largest trauma referral hospitals in the world. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective study of all trauma admissions from October 1, 2010, through September 30, 2011, at Groote Schuur Hospital. A standard admission form was developed with multidisciplinary input and was used for both clinical and data abstraction purposes. Analysis of data was performed in 3 parts: demographics of injury, injury risk by location, and access to and maturity of trauma services. Geographic information science was then used to create satellite imaging of injury "hot spots" and to track referral patterns. Finally, the World Health Organization trauma system maturity index was used to evaluate the current breadth of the trauma system in place. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The demographics of trauma patients, the distribution of injury in a large metropolitan catchment, and the patterns of injury referral and patient movement within the trauma system. RESULTS: The minimum 34-point data set captured relevant demographic, geographic, incident, and clinical data for 9236 patients. Data field completion rates were highly variable. An analysis of demographics of injury (age, sex, and mechanism of injury) was performed. Most violence occurred toward males (71.3%) who were younger than 40 years of age (74.6%). We demonstrated high rates of violent interpersonal injury (71.6% of intentional injury) and motor vehicle injury (18.8% of all injuries). There was a strong association between injury and alcohol use, with alcohol implicated in at least 30.1% of trauma admissions. From a systems standpoint, the data suggest a mature pattern of referral consistent with the presence of an inclusive trauma system. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The implementation of injury surveillance at Groote Schuur Hospital improved insights about injury risk based on demographics and neighborhood as well as access to service based on patterns of referral. This information will guide further development of South Africa's already advanced trauma system.

Collecting injury surveillance data in low- and middle-income countries: the Cape Town Trauma Registry pilot.

Injury is a major public health issue, responsible for 5 million deaths each year, equivalent to the total mortality caused by HIV, malaria and tuberculosis combined. The World Health Organisation estimates that of the total worldwide deaths due to injury, more than 90% occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Despite the burden of injury sustained by LMIC, there are few continuing injury surveillance systems for collection and analysis of injury data. We describe a hospital-based trauma surveillance instrument for collection of a minimum data-set for calculating common injury scoring metrics including the Abbreviated Injury Scale and the Injury Severity Score. The Cape Town Trauma Registry (CTTR) is designed for injury surveillance in low-resource settings. A pilot at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town was conducted for one month to demonstrate the feasibility of systematic data collection and analysis, and to explore challenges of implementing a trauma registry in a LMIC. Key characteristics of the CTTR include: ability to calculate injury severity, key minimal data elements, expansion to include quality indicators and minimal drain on human resources based on few fields. The CTTR provides a strategy to describe the distribution and consequences of injury in a high trauma volume, low-resource environment.