"Go! to Sleep": A Web-Based Therapy for Insomnia.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia is a common complaint of individuals presenting to healthcare providers and is associated with decreased quality of life and higher healthcare utilization. In-person cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for insomnia but is hindered by cost and limited access to treatment. Initial research suggests that Web-based CBT may mitigate these obstacles. INTRODUCTION: This study tests the effectiveness of a Web-based program for insomnia based on principles of CBT and stress management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial with wait-list controls among adults with primary insomnia (n = 88). Two hundred sixty-three adults with comorbid insomnia were also included and analyzed separately. The intervention was a 6-week online program, and effectiveness was measured via the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). RESULTS: Baseline ISI score for the intervention group (n = 43) was 17.0; 16.6 for the control group (n = 45). At first follow-up, the intervention group (n = 25) had a mean change from baseline of -7.3 (95% CI: -9.0, -5.6), sustained through second follow-up, while the control group (n = 35) had a change of -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1). The between-group difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Participants in the comorbid insomnia group had a baseline ISI score of 16.7 with improvement similar to the primary insomnia group (-6.9; -7.6, -6.2). DISCUSSION: We observed clinically meaningful improvements in insomnia severity in adults with primary or comorbid insomnia. Sustained improvement over 4 months underscores the effectiveness of a well-constructed online CBT for insomnia program. CONCLUSIONS: Go! to Sleep

Familial colorectal cancer type X: polyp burden and cancer risk stratification via a family history score.

BACKGROUND: Patients fulfilling Amsterdam-1 criteria without mismatch repair deficiency (termed familial colorectal cancer type X (FCC type X)) were reported to have lower cancer risks than classic Lynch syndrome. This study investigates the polyp and cancer burden of this population and demonstrates relationships with a family history score (FHS). METHODS: The Jagelman Registry was queried for patients meeting Amsterdam criteria with microsatellite stable/low colorectal cancers. The risk of colorectal neoplasia was ascertained using a published FHS. Polyp distribution, histology and cumulative counts as well as extra-colonic tumours in the pedigree were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (9 males, 12 females) met study criteria. The median lifetime polyp count was 3 (range 1­36). FHS 8 (80%) was significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer compared with those with scores <8 who are more likely to develop polyps (P < 0.01). Twelve patients (57%) had predominantly left-sided polyps. Ten colorectal cancers (7 left-sided, 3 right-sided) were diagnosed at a median age of 48 (range 30­74) years. Only three tumours were mucinous or demonstrated tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, typical of high microsatellite instability tumours. All patients had family history of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and at least 10 patients had a family history of uterine or breast cancer. One patient was found to have hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: FCC type X likely represents a heterogenous group of as yet undefined CRC predispositions. The polyp burden and cancer risk are variable and can be somewhat delineated according to an FHS.

Is the phenotype mixed or mistaken? Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and hyperplastic polyposis syndrome.

PURPOSE: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is a hereditary syndrome defined by personal and family history of colorectal and other cancers. Some patients with this condition have multiple serrated polyps, which are the hallmark of hyperplastic polyposis syndrome, a rare colorectal cancer syndrome characterized by multiple hyperplastic/serrated polyps and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that this may represent a unique group of patients, and this study investigates a possible association between the two syndromes. METHODS: A hereditary colorectal cancer registry was reviewed for patients who fit hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or familial colorectal cancer and hyperplastic polyposis syndrome criteria. RESULTS: Twelve patients from seven families were identified. Four families had more than one person meeting the criteria. All patients were white, and four were women. Ten of 12 patients fit Amsterdam criteria, and two were designated with familial colorectal cancer. The median cumulative number of hyperplastic polyps resected per patient was 6, half of which were located in the right colon. Seven of the 12 patients developed colorectal cancer. Ten patients had personal or family history of other cancers: prostate, breast, testicular, salivary gland, lung, and Hodgkin's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients meeting criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer may also carry a diagnosis of hyperplastic polyposis syndrome. Possible explanations include: 1) two hereditary syndromes are present in the same patient, 2) serrated polyps are part of the phenotype of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, or 3) hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is potentially misdiagnosed in some families who do, in fact, have hyperplastic polyposis.

Diagnosis: tuberculosis.

Home care staff frequently become anxious when a patient with active infectious tuberculosis is referred for home care. Using a home care patient case study, this article reviews tuberculosis epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and infection control. It also discusses home health staff's role in case finding because home care patients with chronic disease and immunosuppression conditions are at risk for active tuberculosis disease.

Patterns of surgery in patients belonging to amsterdam-positive families.

INTRODUCTION: The phenotype of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer includes an 80 percent lifetime risk of colorectal cancer, a predominance of lesions proximal to the splenic flexure, and a high incidence of synchronous and metachronous neoplasia. Although prophylactic colectomy is rarely advised for patients with a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genotype and a normal colon, the presence of advanced neoplasia in the context of a qualifying family history or a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genotype has led to such recommendations. We performed this study to document the patterns of colorectal surgery performed for cancer-bearing patients who are part of an Amsterdam criteria-positive family and to compare rates of metachronous cancers that follow index total or segmental colectomy. METHODS: Family trees fulfilling the classic Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer were identified, and all patients for whom surgical and pathology records were available were included in the study. Type of surgery and the outcome of subsequent follow-up were abstracted. Patients were divided into those treated at the Cleveland Clinic and those treated elsewhere. RESULTS: There were 39 families with 93 affected patients. These patients had 127 colorectal cancers, 76 (60 percent) of which were right sided (proximal to the splenic flexure). Median age at diagnosis of the index cancer was 47 (range, 26-81) years. Sixteen patients (17 percent) had metachronous cancers and multiple surgeries, whereas four (4 percent) had synchronous cancers. Median follow-up for patients who underwent surgery at the Cleveland Clinic was 13 (range, 4-49) years, whereas that for those who underwent surgery elsewhere was 14 (range, 1-42) years. Sixteen (48 percent) of the 33 patients who underwent surgery at the Cleveland Clinic had a total colectomy vs. 7 (12 percent) of the 60 who had surgery elsewhere (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001). Only one patient who had surgery at the Cleveland Clinic had a second operation for a metachronous cancer (1/17 patients having a segmental resection). Fifteen patients who underwent surgery elsewhere needed a second resection for metachronous cancer (15/53 patients having a segmental resection; Fisher's exact test, P = 0.094). CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is high risk of metachronous colorectal cancer if an index cancer in a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patient (defined according to Amsterdam criteria) is treated by partial colectomy. However, this risk can be lowered by performing a total colectomy at the time of index surgery, or possibly by effective postoperative surveillance.