Impact of the presence of a mediator on patient violent or uncivil behaviours in emergency departments: a cluster randomised crossover trial.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Several studies reported that violent behaviours were committed by patients against healthcare professionals in emergency departments (EDs). The presence of mediators could prevent or resolve situations of tension. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the presence of mediators in EDs would have an impact on violent behaviours committed by patients or their relatives against healthcare professionals. Design, settings and participants A 6-period cluster randomised crossover trial was performed in 4 EDs during 12 months. Patients aged ≥18 and their relatives were included. INTERVENTION: In order to prevent or resolve situations of tension and conflict, four mediators were recruited.Outcome measure and analysis Using a logistic regression mixed model, the rate of ED visits in which at least one act of violence was committed by a patient or their relatives, reported by healthcare professionals, was compared between the intervention group and the control group. RESULTS: A total of 50 429 ED visits were performed in the mediator intervention group and 50 851 in the control group. The mediators reported 1365 interventions; >50% of the interventions were to answer questions about clinical management or waiting time. In the intervention group, 173 acts of violence were committed during 129 ED visits, and there were 145 acts of violence committed during 106 ED visits in the control group. The rate of ED visits in which at least one act of violence was committed, was 0.26% in the intervention group and 0.21% in the control group (OR = 1.23; 95% CI [0.73-2.09]); on a 4-level seriousness scale, 41.6% of the acts of violence were rated level-1 (acts of incivility or rudeness) in the intervention group and 40.0% in the control group. CONCLUSION: The presence of mediators in the ED was not associated with a reduction in violent or uncivil behaviours committed by patients or their relatives. However, the study highlighted that patients had a major need for information regarding their care; improving communication between patients and healthcare professionals might reduce the violence in EDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03139110).

Strategies used by emergency care professionals to handle interpersonal difficulties with patients: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Identify the strategies implemented by emergency care professionals when facing tension and interpersonal violence from patients and their friends and family. DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative study based on 38 semidirective interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Doctors, nurses, nursing assistants and administrative staff. SETTING: Four emergency departments (EDs) from three French university hospitals. RESULTS: According to the medical professionals interviewed, the difficulties that they encounter with patients or their accompanying family members can be explained by a lack of understanding of the functioning of EDs, by a general increase in individualistic behaviours leading to a lack of civility or by deviant behaviours (related to toxic substance abuse or mental illness). While managing deviant behaviours may sometimes require a collective intervention, ED staff also implement what are essentially individual communication strategies (with the use of rational explanation, seduction and empathy), confrontation or flight to deal with interpersonal difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies used by staff members tend to be individualised for the most part, and some, such as confrontational or escape strategies, may not be adapted to all situations. In the face of difficulties between staff and patients, mediators, specialised in resolving conflict, could entrust some cases to professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03139110).

Un médiateur dans un service d'urgences hospitalières : quelles missions selon les personnels ?

OBJECTIVES: Violence in emergency services has become a central issue in the daily work of hospital employees. While the use of video surveillance and the training of professionals in conflict management are the most common methods used, there are few cases using the setting up of a third part such as a mediator. We conducted a qualitative study with professionals to examine their representations associated with mediation. METHOD: Semi-directive interviews were conducted with professionals from four emergency units. The topics discussed in interviews were the definition of mediation and the missions that the mediators should fulfil. The content of 38 semi-directive interviews was analysed according to the inductive approach of the grounded theory. A content analysis was made, followed by an analysis aiming to bring out types and convergences/divergences. RESULTS: Professionals were not aware of the definition of mediation and of its missions. They linked to it an instrumental theme, making mediation a tool for conflict prevention and management, a tool for communication with patients about their care, and about the organisation of emergency unit. The upcoming presence of mediators was seen as an help. A potential competition between professionals and mediators in the tasks performed was identified. CONCLUSION: The study shows a favourable opinion towards mediation. It has allowed to identify obstacles to the well-functioning of the missions assigned to mediators. One of the challenges is the integration of this new actor, the mediator.

[Mediators in emergency services: what missions according to the staff?] / Un médiateur dans un service d'urgences hospitalières : quelles missions selon les personnels ?

OBJECTIVES: Violence in emergency services has become a central issue in the daily work of hospital employees. While the use of video surveillance and the training of professionals in conflict management are the most common methods used, there are few cases using the setting up of a third part such as a mediator. We conducted a qualitative study with professionals to examine their representations associated with mediation. METHOD: Semi-directive interviews were conducted with professionals from four emergency units. The topics discussed in interviews were the definition of mediation and the missions that the mediators should fulfil. The content of 38 semi-directive interviews was analysed according to the inductive approach of the grounded theory. A content analysis was made, followed by an analysis aiming to bring out types and convergences/divergences. RESULTS: Professionals were not aware of the definition of mediation and of its missions. They linked to it an instrumental theme, making mediation a tool for conflict prevention and management, a tool for communication with patients about their care, and about the organisation of emergency unit. The upcoming presence of mediators was seen as an help. A potential competition between professionals and mediators in the tasks performed was identified. CONCLUSION: The study shows a favourable opinion towards mediation. It has allowed to identify obstacles to the well-functioning of the missions assigned to mediators. One of the challenges is the integration of this new actor, the mediator.