Current Prognostic Biomarkers for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of the Literature.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a progressive dilatation of the aorta that can lead to aortic rupture. The pathophysiology of the disease is not well characterized but is known to be caused by the general breakdown of the extracellular matrix within the aortic wall. In this comprehensive literature review, all current research on proteins that have been investigated for their potential prognostic capabilities in patients with AAA was included. A total of 45 proteins were found to be potential prognostic biomarkers for AAA, predicting incidence of AAA, AAA rupture, AAA growth, endoleak, and post-surgical mortality. The 45 proteins fell into the following seven general categories based on their primary function: (1) cardiovascular health, (2) hemostasis, (3) transport proteins, (4) inflammation and immunity, (5) kidney function, (6) cellular structure, (7) and hormones and growth factors. This is the most up-to-date literature review on current prognostic markers for AAA and their functions. This review outlines the wide pathophysiological processes that are implicated in AAA disease progression.

In Vivo Function of Flow-Responsive Cis-DNA Elements of eNOS Gene: A Role for Chromatin-Based Mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: eNOS (endothelial nitric oxide synthase) is an endothelial cell (EC)-specific gene predominantly expressed in medium- to large-sized arteries where ECs experience atheroprotective laminar flow with high shear stress. Disturbed flow with lower average shear stress decreases eNOS transcription, which leads to the development of atherosclerosis, especially at bifurcations and curvatures of arteries. This prototypic arterial EC gene contains 2 distinct flow-responsive cis-DNA elements in the promoter, the shear stress response element (SSRE) and the KLF (Krüppel-like factor) element. Previous in vitro studies suggested their positive regulatory functions on flow-induced transcription of EC genes including eNOS. However, the in vivo function of these cis-DNA elements remains unknown. METHODS: Insertional transgenic mice with a mutation at each flow-responsive cis-DNA element were generated using a murine eNOS promoter-ß-galactosidase reporter by linker-scanning mutagenesis and compared with episomal-based mutations in vitro. DNA methylation at the eNOS proximal promoter in mouse ECs was assessed by bisulfite sequencing or pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Wild type mice with a functional eNOS promoter-reporter transgene exhibited reduced endothelial reporter expression in the atheroprone regions of disturbed flow (n=5). It is surprising that the SSRE mutation abrogated reporter expression in ECs and was associated with aberrant hypermethylation at the eNOS proximal promoter (n=7). Reporter gene silencing was independent of transgene copy number and integration position, indicating that the SSRE is a critical cis-element necessary for eNOS transcription in vivo. The KLF mutation demonstrated an integration site-specific decrease in eNOS transcription, again with marked promoter methylation (n=8), suggesting that the SSRE alone is not sufficient for eNOS transcription in vivo. In wild type mice, the native eNOS promoter was significantly hypermethylated in ECs from the atheroprone regions where eNOS expression was markedly repressed by chronic disturbed flow, demonstrating that eNOS expression is regulated by flow-dependent DNA methylation that is region-specific in the arterial endothelium in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: We report, for the first time, that the SSRE and KLF elements are critical flow sensors necessary for a transcriptionally permissive, hypomethylated eNOS promoter in ECs under chronic shear stress in vivo. Moreover, eNOS expression is regulated by flow-dependent epigenetic mechanisms, which offers novel mechanistic insight on eNOS gene regulation in atherogenesis.

Optimization of community-led 3D printing for the production of protective face shields.

BACKGROUND: As the healthcare system faced an acute shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of 3D printing technologies became an innovative method of increasing production capacity to meet this acute need. Due to the emergence of a large number of 3D printed face shield designs and community-led PPE printing initiatives, this case study examines the methods and design best optimized for community printers who may not have the resources or experience to conduct such a thorough analysis. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the optimization of the production of 3D printed face shields by community 3D printers, as part of an initiative aimed at producing PPE for healthcare workers. The face shield frames were manufactured using the 3DVerkstan design and were coupled with an acetate sheet to assemble a complete face shield. Rigorous quality assurance and decontamination protocols ensured community-printed PPE was satisfactory for healthcare use. CONCLUSION: Additive manufacturing is a promising method of producing adequate face shields for frontline health workers because of its versatility and quick up-start time. The optimization of stacking and sanitization protocols allowed 3D printing to feasibly supplement formal public health responses in the face of a global pandemic.