Diagnostic accuracy of virtual non-contrast CT for aortic valve stenosis severity evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography aortic valve calcium (AVC) score has accepted value for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS). Multi-energy CT (MECT) allows virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions from contrast scans. We aim to compare the VNC-AVC score to the true non-contrast (TNC)-AVC score for assessing AS severity. METHODS: We prospectively included patients undergoing a MECT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning. TNC-AVC was acquired before contrast, and VNC-AVC was derived from a retrospectively gated contrast-enhanced scan. The Agatston scoring method was used for quantification, and linear regression analysis to derive adjusted-VNC values. RESULTS: Among 109 patients (55% female) included, 43% had concordant severe and 14% concordant moderate AS. TNC scan median dose-length product was 116 â€‹mGy∗cm. The median TNC-AVC was 2,107 AU (1,093-3,372), while VNC-AVC was 1,835 AU (1293-2,972) after applying the coefficient (1.46) and constant (743) terms. A strong correlation was demonstrated between methods (r â€‹= â€‹0.93; p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Using accepted thresholds (>1,300 AU for women and >2,000 AU for men), 65% (n â€‹= â€‹71) of patients had severe AS by TNC-AVC and 67% (n â€‹= â€‹73) by adjusted-VNC-AVC. After estimating thresholds for adjusted-VNC (>1,564 AU for women and >2,375 AU for men), 56% (n â€‹= â€‹61) had severe AS, demonstrating substantial agreement with TNC-AVC (κ â€‹= â€‹0.77). CONCLUSIONS: MECT-derived VNC-AVC showed a strong correlation with TNC-AVC. After adjustment, VNC-AVC demonstrated substantial agreement with TNC-AVC, potentially eliminating the requirement for an additional scan and enabling reductions in both radiation exposure and acquisition time.

Standardization of common bile duct size using ultrasound in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The incidence of choledocholithiasis is increasing. The diagnosis of common bile duct (CBD) obstruction is based on abnormal CBD size. Establishing norms for CBD size in children would improve diagnostic accuracy. We analyzed ultrasounds (US) to determine normal pediatric CBD size based on age and then validated this against patients with choledocholithiasis. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for children less than 21 years of age with US defined CBD size. Patients were stratified into age groups by ANOVA statistical analysis. Secondary analysis included patients with confirmed choledocholithiasis in comparison to the normal cohort. RESULTS: A total of 778 patients had US without pathology. Group 1 (<1 year) had a mean CBD of 1.24±0.54 mm, group 2 (1-10 years) 1.97±0.71 mm, and group 3 (>10 years) 2.98±1.17 mm, p<0.05. Fourteen additional patients were found to have choledocholithiasis with a mean CBD size of 8.1 mm. All patients with choledocholithiasis had CBD sizes outside of our normal range, but only 50% of patients had enlarged CBD size based on adult normal range of values. CONCLUSION: Normal CBD size in children is less than a normal adult patient. More accurate normal values will aid in determining if a child needs further evaluation for possible obstruction of the CBD. TYPE OF STUDY: diagnostic Level of evidence: III.