Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.

Audience: The target audience for this small group session is post-graduate year (PGY) 1-4 emergency medicine (EM) residents, pediatric EM (PEM) fellows, and medical students. Introduction: Pediatric emergency department visits have been declining since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to decreased exposure to pediatric emergency care for EM residents and other learners in the ED.1 This is a major problem, given that the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates that a minimum of 20% of patient encounters or five months of training time for EM residents must occur with pediatric patients, with at least 50% of that time spent in the ED setting.2,3 A minimum of 12 months must be spent in the pediatric ED for PEM fellows,2 and an average of 7.1 weeks of medical school are spent in pediatric clerkships.4 This decrease in pediatrics exposure in the post-pandemic environment can be addressed through simulation and gamification. We selected the gamification method of an escape room to create an engaging environment in which learners could interface with key pediatric emergency medicine clinical concepts via group learning. Educational Objectives: By the end of this small group exercise, learners will be able to:Demonstrate appropriate dosing of pediatric code and resuscitation medicationsRecognize normal pediatric vital signs by ageDemonstrate appropriate use of formulas to calculate pediatric equipment sizes and insertion depthsRecognize classic pediatric murmursAppropriately diagnose congenital cardiac conditionsRecognize abnormal pediatric electrocardiograms (ECGs)Identify life-threatening pediatric conditionsDemonstrate intraosseous line (IO) insertion on a pediatric modelDemonstrate appropriate use of the Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol (NRP®) algorithms. Educational Methods: An escape room - a form of gamification - was utilized to engage the learners in active learning. Gamification is an increasingly popular educational technique being utilized in graduate medical education and refers to the conversion of serious, non-trivial material into a fun activity fashioned like a game in order to enhance engagement in learning.5 This educational method seeks to enhance knowledge, attitudes, and skills via components of games - such as puzzles and prizes - outside of the context of a traditional game.6 Though high-quality research data on the effectiveness of gamification methods in graduate medical education is limited, studies have shown that gamification enhances learning, attitudes, and behaviors.5,7 One randomized, clinical-controlled trial investigating the use of gamification to enhance patient outcomes found that patients of primary care physicians randomized to the gamification group reached blood pressure targets faster than in the control group.8 Escape rooms as a modality for education have been suggested to improve active learning and enhance learner engagement in the learning process.9 In an escape room, learners are "locked" in an artificial environment (whether digitally or in person) and must utilize their group or individual knowledge to solve puzzles and escape from their "entrapment."9,10 Escape rooms utilized as part of EM residency didactic training have demonstrated learner enthusiasm,11,12 desire to repeat the activity again,13 preference for escape rooms over traditional learning methods,14,15 improved confidence in communication and leadership skills,11,15 and improvement scores from pre- to post-testing.16We developed an escape room in which learners were divided into teams and informed that they would need to "escape" from our resident lounge by successfully completing all nine stations. The first team to complete all nine stations would win a prize. Only after the last team completed the ninth station and debriefing was complete could all teams be "freed" from the escape room. Research Methods: Learners provided anonymous online survey feedback regarding the quality of the educational content and the efficacy of the delivery method. Results: A post-participation survey was disseminated to 55 residents, 32 of whom attended the PEM Escape Room, with a response rate of 9% (3/32 residents). One hundred percent of respondents felt that the activity content was applicable to their needs as an emergency physician. The session was rated as excellent by 33.3% of respondents, and 66.7% of respondents rated the session as above average. A second survey was disseminated seven months after the event to the 24 remaining residents who attended the event, with a response rate of 46% (11/24 residents); eight attendees had graduated at the time of this survey dissemination. Results of the second survey indicated that 100% (24/24 residents) felt that the activity content was applicable to their needs as an emergency physician, 73% (17/24 residents) rated the session as excellent, and 27% (7/24 residents) rated the session as above average. Discussion: Though we received limited survey responses (3/32 on the first survey and 11/24 on the second survey), respondents felt that the educational content met their learning needs and was of high quality. We had six faculty members present to facilitate the escape room while there were four groups of residents (eight per group). The ideal faculty to resident ratio would be one faculty member per group with three to six players, based on prior literature showing that teams of more than six players take longer to complete escape room tasks.17,18 We also recognized the importance of sending out the feedback survey link early because we believe the delay in our survey being emailed to the residents contributed to the low response rate (three trainees).One participant provided the following feedback: "I think the 'escape room' struck an excellent balance with regard to trying to address knowledge that was relevant but also obscure or difficult enough that group/collaborative effort was required. I enjoyed the process and low stakes atmosphere." This quote nicely summarizes our take-aways: That the PEM escape room incorporates key tenets of adult learning theory. Also known as andragogy, adult learning theory posits that adult learners are self-directed, have prior life experiences that shape their learning process, learn for practical reasons (ie, choose to learn in order to fulfill the demands of their social role), and are problem-oriented in their learning.19 Though andragogy does not technically apply only to adults (as many children are self-directed learners),20 having an understanding of the practical and experiential nature via which adults approach learning allows the adult educator to appropriately cater educational activities to meet the adult learner's needs.This escape room aligned with the core tenets of adult learning theory in several ways. Specifically, residents were given autonomy of participation in the escape room and thus had to take initiative to promote their own learning.21 Topics featured in the escape room stations were selected based on their clinical challenges and high-yield for board examinations and patient care, making their relevance immediately obvious to learners; this is a key feature of catering to adult learners.22 The escape room provided a comfortable and collegial environment in which residents felt comfortable learning, fostering an ideal setting for mature learners.21 Direct and immediate feedback are key components of adult learning theory, and faculty members were physically present to provide feedback at each escape room station.22 Finally, working in teams required the learners to engage in active learning rather than acting as passive recipients of cognitive information.21 Thus, the PEM escape room serves as an ideal framework to meet the needs of the adult learner. Topics: Pediatrics, emergency medicine, pediatric emergency medicine.

Synchronized Cardioversion Performed During Cold Water Immersion of a Heatstroke Patient.

We report a case of cardioversion that was successfully performed on a patient during cold water immersion. The patient deteriorated into unstable ventricular tachycardia while being treated for heatstroke. We elected to perform synchronized cardioversion without first removing the patient from the immersion body bag. The patient survived and was discharged neurologically intact on hospital day 5. There were no evident deleterious effects to the staff, the patient, or the equipment. To our knowledge, this is the first case report in the literature demonstrating the electrical cardioversion of a patient immersed in water.

Medical Care During Mountain Rescue in King County, Washington, from 2004 to 2017.

INTRODUCTION: Seattle Mountain Rescue (SMR) is a nonprofit, volunteer organization that provides mountain rescue services in King County, Washington. This study analyzed the medical care provided by SMR over 14 y to understand the challenges in patient care in the region and to perform data collection and monitoring. METHODS: A retrospective review of mission reports submitted from 2004 to 2017 was conducted. Date, location, demographics, activity, callout reason, chief complaint, treatments provided, extraction means, and helicopter utilization were analyzed. Data are presented as mean±SD, with range as appropriate, unless otherwise noted. Linear regression was used to estimate changes in mission volume over time. RESULTS: There were 552 missions involving 756 subjects during the study period. Mission totals increased by 4 (95% CI 2-6, P<0.001) per year. Four locations accounted for 38% of mission volume. Subject age was 36±18 y, and 59% of subjects were male. The most common activity leading to rescue was hiking (80%). Injuries or illness precipitated 58% of callouts, whereas lost, stranded, or overdue subjects comprised 40%. For subjects requiring medical treatment, 81% involved a traumatic injury, 64% were packaged in a litter, and 35% required splinting. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of mountain rescue missions in King County, Washington, has increased in the past 14 y, with traumatic injuries most frequently requiring medical care. Missing data were common in most categories, and nonstandardized reports challenged research efforts. This study provides a baseline for future research and data collection and adds to the literature regarding the medical care provided during mountain rescue incidents.

Airway Management Practice in Adults With an Unstable Cervical Spine: The Harborview Medical Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Airway management in the presence of acute cervical spine injury (CSI) is challenging. Because it limits cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation and allows for neurological examination after the procedure, awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) has traditionally been recommended. However, with the widespread availability of video laryngoscopy (VL), its use has declined dramatically. Our aim was to describe the frequency of airway management techniques used in patients with CSI at our level I trauma center and report the incidence of neurological injury attributable to airway management. METHODS: Adults presenting to the operating room with CSI without a tracheal tube in situ between September 2010 and June 2017 were included. All patients were intubated in the presence of manual-in-line stabilization, a hard cervical collar, or surgical traction. Worsening neurological status was defined as new motor or sensory deficits on postoperative examination. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two patients were included, of which 76 (30.2%) had preexisting neurological deficits. VL was the most frequent initial airway management technique used (49.6%). Asleep FOB was commonly performed alone (30.6%) or in conjunction with VL (13.5%). Awake FOB was rarely performed (2.3%), as was direct laryngoscopy (2.8%). All techniques were associated with high first-attempt success rates, and no cases of neurological injury attributable to airway management technique were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute CSI at a high-volume academic trauma center, VL was the most commonly used initial intubation technique. Awake FOB and direct laryngoscopy were performed infrequently. No cases of neurological deterioration secondary to airway management occurred with any method. Assuming care is taken to limit neck movement, providers should use the intubation technique with which they have the most comfort and skill.

Intraosseous compared to intravenous drug resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

AIMS: Although the intraosseous (IO) route is increasingly used for vascular access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), little is known about its comparative effectiveness relative to intravenous (IV) access. We evaluated clinical outcomes following OHCA comparing drug administration via IO versus IV routes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated Emergency Medical Services (EMS)-treated adults with atraumatic OHCA in a large metropolitan EMS system between 9/1/2012-12/31/2014. Access was classified as IO or IV based on the route of first EMS drug administration. Study endpoints were survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital admission. RESULTS: Among 2164 adults with OHCA, 1800 met eligibility criteria, 1525 of whom were treated via IV and 275 principally via tibial-IO routes. Compared to IV, IO-treated patients were younger, more often women, had unwitnessed OHCA, a non-cardiac aetiology, and presented with non-shockable rhythms. IO versus IV-treated patients were less likely to survive to hospital discharge (14.9% vs 22.8%, p=0.003), achieve ROSC (43.6% vs 55.5%, p<0.001) or be hospitalized (38.5% vs 50.0% p<0.001). In multivariable adjusted analyses, IO treatment was not associated with survival to discharge (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval) 0.81 (0.55, 1.21), p=0.31), but was associated with a lower likelihood of ROSC (OR=0.67 (0.50, 0.88), p=0.004) and survival to hospitalization (OR=0.68 (0.51, 0.91), p=0.009). CONCLUSION: Though not independently associated with survival to discharge, principally tibial IO versus IV treatment was associated with a lower likelihood of ROSC and hospitalization. How routes of vascular access influence clinical outcomes after OHCA merits additional study.