Epithelial Remodeling and Epithelial Wavefront Aberrometry after Spherical vs. Cylindrical Myopic Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

Background/Objectives: To compare the epithelial thickness changes and the changes in epithelial wavefront aberrometry following spherical versus astigmatic myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Methods: Eighty-six eyes of 86 patients who underwent SMILE were included in this retrospective study. A total of 43 eyes underwent myopic spherical correction (spherical group) and 43 eyes underwent myopic cylindrical correction (cylindrical group). The groups were matched according to the spherical equivalent of surgically corrected refraction. Subjective manifest refraction as well as high-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography (MS-39; CSO; Florence, Italy) were obtained preoperatively as well as 3 months postoperatively. The latter was utilized for computing epithelial wavefront aberrometry in addition to epithelial thickness mapping. Results: Epithelial thickness increased significantly in both groups after SMILE (p < 0.01). In the cylindrical group, epithelial thickening was more pronounced on the flat meridian compared to the steep meridian (p = 0.04). In both groups, epithelial wavefront aberrometry showed a significant postoperative increase in the epithelium's spherical refractive power, causing a myopization of -0.24 ± 0.42 diopters (D) in the spherical group (p < 0.01) and -0.41 ± 0.52 D in the cylindrical group (p < 0.0001). While no significant changes in epithelial cylindrical refractive power were observed in the spherical group, a significant increase was noted in the cylindrical group from -0.21 ± 0.24 D to -0.37 ± 0.31 D (p = 0.01). In both groups, epithelial higher-order aberrations increased significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative epithelial remodeling after SMILE alters lower-order (sphere and cylinder) and higher-order aberrations of the corneal epithelial wavefront and might contribute to refractive undercorrection, especially in astigmatic corrections. Epithelial wavefront aberrometry can be used to quantify the refractive effect of epithelial remodeling processes after keratorefractive surgery.

[Enhancement Options after Lens and Corneal Refractive Surgery]. / Enhancement-Optionen nach Linsen- und refraktiver Hornhautchirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Modern preoperative diagnostics as well as current surgical techniques allow cataract and refractive surgery to deliver precise refractive results.Occasionally, unsatisfactory refractive and visual results occur despite all the care taken. In these cases, subsequent improvement is required to achieve the best final visual outcome. This article shows the therapeutic options for the treatment of residual refractive errors after lens and corneal refractive surgery. KEY MESSAGES: The causes of postoperative refractive errors after refractive laser- or lens-based procedures are very diverse and require extensive workup of the cause as well as an individual solution to achieve the desired result. Before any further surgical intervention, specific complications of the primary procedure as well as concomitant ocular diseases must be excluded or treated. The appropriate enhancement after keratorefractive surgery depends primarily on the type of primary surgery, residual stromal thickness, possible complications from the initial surgery, and the patient's personal preference. For enhancements using surface treatments, such as PRK, the use of mitomycin C is recommended for prophylaxis of haze formation. After lens surgery, for low-grade postoperative refractive errors (spherical and astigmatic), keratorefractive enhancements provide the most accurate results. For higher refractive errors, lens-based procedures can be used, with add-on IOLs being safer and more precise compared with one IOL exchange. Low astigmatisms can be successfully treated with LRI or keratorefractive surgery, but higher astigmatisms should be corrected with an IOL exchange in the early postoperative period and with an add-on IOL in the later postoperative period. IOL explantations should be performed very cautiously, especially in cases of pronounced capsular fibrosis, previous posterior capsulotomy, and existing weakness of the zonular apparatus.

Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcome between Two Methods of Corneal Marking for Toric Implantable Collamer Lenses (TICL) in Phakic Eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of digital-assisted reference marking for toric implantable collamer lenses (Callisto Eye System) with manual marking technique using a slit lamp markeur. METHODS: This study included patients that underwent implantation of a toric implantable collamer lens (EVO Visian toric ICL, Staar Surgical). Patients were included if they had a myopia above -3 diopters (D) and regular corneal astigmatism of 0.75 diopters or higher. Between both groups a 1:2 matching regarding similar preoperative level of myopia and astigmatism was performed. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated. Vector analysis was performed to evaluate total astigmatic changes. RESULTS: This study comprised 57 eyes of 57 patients with 19 eyes in the digital group and 38 eyes in the manual marking group. Postoperatively there were no statistically significant differences between both groups in UDVA (p = 0.467), spherical equivalent (SE) (p = 0.864), sphere (p = 0.761) and cylinder (p = 0.878). Vector analysis showed a slightly more accurate postoperative refractive astigmatism in the manual group (0.26 D at 107° ± 0.50 D) compared to the digital marking group (0.31 D at 107° ± 0.45 D), nevertheless with no statistically significant differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A digital tracking approach for toric ICL alignment was an efficient and safe method for toric marking with similar results regarding visual and refractive outcomes compared to a conventional corneal marking method. Nevertheless, image-guided surgery helped to streamline the workflow in refractive ICL surgery.

Corneal Collagen Crosslinking (CXL) for Corneal Ectasia after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). / Korneales Kollagen-Crosslinking (CXL) bei Hornhautektasie nach SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction).

With an estimated incidence of 0.011%, the SMILE procedure seems to have the lowest risk of postoperative keratectasia among contemporary keratorefractive procedures. Nevertheless, due to the novelty of the procedure as well as the lack of data, no clear superiority over femto-LASIK or PRK can be stated at this time. In this respect, application of the identical tomographic screening criteria previously developed for excimer-based procedures is of paramount importance to minimize the risk of corneal ectasia. As an adjunct to conventional corneal tomography, newer imaging modalities such as OCT-based epithelial mapping should be used for preoperative screening before keratorefractive surgery. Corneal crosslinking is an established treatment modality for post-SMILE keratectasia, which promises high success rates especially in early stages. The present case report illustrates these diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.

Femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: cell-based and tissue-based ex vivo analysis of precision and safety.

PURPOSE: To analyze precision and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis and postoperative corneal wound healing in human ex vivo specimens. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. DESIGN: Experimental ex vivo study. METHODS: 4 donor corneas underwent femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis. The descemetorhexis was performed using the LDV Z8 femtosecond laser, followed by live/dead staining, phase contrast microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The descemetorhexis parameters were set using a modified optical coherence tomography image capturing of 8 segments within a focus of 100 µm at the posterior corneal stroma (reversed capsulotomy program). RESULTS: Live/dead sample staining analysis demonstrated that the femtosecond laser had minimal impact on the vitality of surrounding endothelial cells. Phase contrast microscopy and scanning electron microscopy evaluation showed that the laser produced precise, clear-cut edges, leaving no stromal tissue bridges. CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser-assisted descemetorhexis could serve as a safe and precise technique with only minimal endothelial cell damage. To minimize stromal damage, further laser energy profile adjustments are necessary to optimize corneal treatment within different stages of corneal tissue swelling.