Association of Serum Phosphate with Efficacy of Statin Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Statins are less efficacious in reducing cardiovascular disease risk in patients on dialysis than in the general population. Recent experimental data showed that phosphate excess promotes cellular de novo cholesterol synthesis through 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase activation. Whether this mechanism might account for the resistance of patients on dialysis to statins has not yet been explored. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this post hoc analysis, we examined the efficacy of statin treatment according to serum phosphate levels in the patients on dialysis who were participants of the A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Regular Hemodialysis: An Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events (AURORA) trial using serum phosphate levels at baseline and during the trial course. We first classified the patients by groups of similar phosphate trajectories over time and tested whether phosphate as a longitudinal exposure (summarized by the identified trajectory groups) modulated the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause death. We replicate the analysis in the Deutsche Diabetes Dialyze Studie (4D) trial. RESULTS: In the AURORA trial, using multivariable analysis, we found that the treatment effect of statin on major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause death was significant and protective effects in patients with low values of serum phosphate gradually faded for higher phosphate levels >5 mg/dl. A similar lack of statin treatment efficacy for both outcomes was observed with high baseline phosphate levels (>5 mg/dl). In the 4D trial, we found a comparable but not significant trend toward losing treatment efficacy in the presence of high serum phosphate levels for both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the limited treatment efficacy of statins in patients on dialysis in the presence of hyperphosphatemia.

Exome-Based Rare-Variant Analyses in CKD.

BACKGROUND: Studies have identified many common genetic associations that influence renal function and all-cause CKD, but these explain only a small fraction of variance in these traits. The contribution of rare variants has not been systematically examined. METHODS: We performed exome sequencing of 3150 individuals, who collectively encompassed diverse CKD subtypes, and 9563 controls. To detect causal genes and evaluate the contribution of rare variants we used collapsing analysis, in which we compared the proportion of cases and controls carrying rare variants per gene. RESULTS: The analyses captured five established monogenic causes of CKD: variants in PKD1, PKD2, and COL4A5 achieved study-wide significance, and we observed suggestive case enrichment for COL4A4 and COL4A3. Beyond known disease-associated genes, collapsing analyses incorporating regional variant intolerance identified suggestive dominant signals in CPT2 and several other candidate genes. Biallelic mutations in CPT2 cause carnitine palmitoyltransferase II deficiency, sometimes associated with rhabdomyolysis and acute renal injury. Genetic modifier analysis among cases with APOL1 risk genotypes identified a suggestive signal in AHDC1, implicated in Xia-Gibbs syndrome, which involves intellectual disability and other features. On the basis of the observed distribution of rare variants, we estimate that a two- to three-fold larger cohort would provide 80% power to implicate new genes for all-cause CKD. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that rare-variant collapsing analyses can validate known genes and identify candidate genes and modifiers for kidney disease. In so doing, these findings provide a motivation for larger-scale investigation of rare-variant risk contributions across major clinical CKD categories.

Diagnostic Utility of Exome Sequencing for Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Exome sequencing is emerging as a first-line diagnostic method in some clinical disciplines, but its usefulness has yet to be examined for most constitutional disorders in adults, including chronic kidney disease, which affects more than 1 in 10 persons globally. METHODS: We conducted exome sequencing and diagnostic analysis in two cohorts totaling 3315 patients with chronic kidney disease. We assessed the diagnostic yield and, among the patients for whom detailed clinical data were available, the clinical implications of diagnostic and other medically relevant findings. RESULTS: In all, 3037 patients (91.6%) were over 21 years of age, and 1179 (35.6%) were of self-identified non-European ancestry. We detected diagnostic variants in 307 of the 3315 patients (9.3%), encompassing 66 different monogenic disorders. Of the disorders detected, 39 (59%) were found in only a single patient. Diagnostic variants were detected across all clinically defined categories, including congenital or cystic renal disease (127 of 531 patients [23.9%]) and nephropathy of unknown origin (48 of 281 patients [17.1%]). Of the 2187 patients assessed, 34 (1.6%) had genetic findings for medically actionable disorders that, although unrelated to their nephropathy, would also lead to subspecialty referral and inform renal management. CONCLUSIONS: Exome sequencing in a combined cohort of more than 3000 patients with chronic kidney disease yielded a genetic diagnosis in just under 10% of cases. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).

Targeted-release budesonide versus placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy (NEFIGAN): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy is thought to be associated with mucosal immune system dysfunction, which manifests as renal IgA deposition that leads to impairment and end-stage renal disease in 20-40% of patients within 10-20 years. In this trial (NEFIGAN) we aimed to assess safety and efficacy of a novel targeted-release formulation of budesonide (TRF-budesonide), designed to deliver the drug to the distal ileum in patients with IgA nephropathy. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial, comprised of 6-month run-in, 9-month treatment, and 3-month follow-up phases at 62 nephrology clinics across ten European countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with biopsy-confirmed primary IgA nephropathy and persistent proteinuria despite optimised renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade. We randomly allocated patients with a computer algorithm, with a fixed block size of three, in a 1:1:1 ratio to 16 mg/day TRF-budesonide, 8 mg/day TRF-budesonide, or placebo, stratified by baseline urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR). Patients self-administered masked capsules, once daily, 1 h before breakfast during the treatment phase. All patients continued optimised RAS blockade treatment throughout the trial. Our primary outcome was mean change from baseline in UPCR for the 9-month treatment phase, which was assessed in the full analysis set, defined as all randomised patients who took at least one dose of trial medication and had at least one post-dose efficacy measurement. Safety was assessed in all patients who received the intervention. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01738035. FINDINGS: Between Dec 11, 2012, and June 25, 2015, 150 randomised patients were treated (safety set) and 149 patients were eligible for the full analysis set. Overall, at 9 months TRF-budesonide (16 mg/day plus 8 mg/day) was associated with a 24·4% (SEM 7·7%) decrease from baseline in mean UPCR (change in UPCR vs placebo 0·74; 95% CI 0·59-0·94; p=0·0066). At 9 months, mean UPCR had decreased by 27·3% in 48 patients who received 16 mg/day (0·71; 0·53-0·94; p=0·0092) and 21·5% in the 51 patients who received 8 mg/day (0·76; 0·58-1·01; p=0·0290); 50 patients who received placebo had an increase in mean UPCR of 2·7%. The effect was sustained throughout followup. Incidence of adverse events was similar in all groups (43 [88%] of 49 in the TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day group, 48 [94%] of 51 in the TRF-budesonide 8 mg/day, and 42 [84%] of 50 controls). Two of 13 serious adverse events were possibly associated with TRF-budesonide-deep vein thrombosis (16 mg/day) and unexplained deterioration in renal function in follow-up (patients were tapered from 16 mg/day to 8 mg/day over 2 weeks and follow-up was assessed 4 weeks later). INTERPRETATION: TRF-budesonide 16 mg/day, added to optimised RAS blockade, reduced proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy. This effect is indicative of a reduced risk of future progression to end-stage renal disease. TRF-budesonide could become the first specific treatment for IgA nephropathy targeting intestinal mucosal immunity upstream of disease manifestation. FUNDING: Pharmalink AB.

Model comparisons of competing risk and recurrent events for graft failure in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Risk factor analysis of long-term graft survival in kidney transplant recipients is usually based on Cox regression models of time to first occurrence of doubling of serum creatinine or graft loss (DSCGL). However, death is a competing cause of failure, and censoring patients who die could bias estimates. We therefore compared estimates of time to first event versus estimates that included death as a competing risk and recurrent events. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A Cox regression analysis of 1997-2002 data from the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplant (ALERT) trial population identified an eight-factor risk model, by analyzing time to first occurrence of DSCGL. The same factors were re-analyzed, allowing for death as competing. The probability of survival free of DSCGL was estimated; and two recurrent models (marginal and conditional) were used for time to events. RESULTS: Creatinine, systolic BP, and HLA-DR mismatches lost 33%-46% of their strength of association with DSCGL when death was included as a competing risk. Small changes were observed if recurrent events were analyzed in the marginal model. CONCLUSION: The relationship between serum creatinine and DSCGL was attenuated when death was considered as a competing risk; inclusion of recurrent events had little effect. These findings have important implications for analysis and trial design in populations at high mortality risk.

Prevention of cardiovascular disease in adult recipients of kidney transplants.

Although advances in immunosuppression, tissue typing, surgery, and medical management have made transplantation a routine and preferred treatment for patients with irreversible renal failure, successful transplant recipients have a greatly increased risk of premature mortality because of cardiovascular disease and malignancy compared with the general population. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, and diabetes are common in transplant recipients, partly because of the effects of immunosuppressive drugs, and are associated with adverse outcomes. However, the natural history of cardiovascular disease in such recipients differs from that in the general population, and only statin therapy has been studied in a large-scale interventional trial. Thus, the management of this disease and the balance between management of conventional risk factors and modification of immunosuppression is complex.

Rosuvastatin in diabetic hemodialysis patients.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial in diabetic patients receiving hemodialysis showed no effect of atorvastatin on a composite cardiovascular endpoint, but analysis of the component cardiac endpoints suggested that atorvastatin may significantly reduce risk. Because the AURORA (A Study to Evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in Subjects on Regular Hemodialysis: An Assessment of Survival and Cardiovascular Events) trial included patients with and without diabetes, we conducted a post hoc analysis to determine whether rosuvastatin might reduce the risk of cardiac events in diabetic patients receiving hemodialysis. Among the 731 participants with diabetes, traditional risk factors such as LDL-C, smoking, and BP did not associate with cardiac events (cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction). At baseline, only age and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were independent risk factors for cardiac events. Assignment to rosuvastatin associated with a nonsignificant 16.2% reduction in risk for the AURORA trial's composite primary endpoint of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, or fatal or nonfatal stroke (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.07). There was no difference in overall stroke, but the rosuvastatin group had more hemorrhagic strokes than the placebo group (12 versus two strokes, respectively; HR, 5.21; 95% CI 1.17 to 23.27). Rosuvastatin treatment significantly reduced the rates of cardiac events by 32% among patients with diabetes (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90). In conclusion, among hemodialysis patients with diabetes mellitus, rosuvastatin might reduce the risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiac events.

Cardioprotective role of statins in chronic kidney disease: do we have the answer?

The observational study by Szummer et al. shows that patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are treated less with statins after myocardial infarction, even though statins benefit survival in CKD classes 1-4. The study's limitations are obvious, but such a population may be more representative. The results indicate that statins should be used more frequently after myocardial infarction in CKD classes lower than 5, a conclusion supported by the recently presented Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP).

Cardiovascular disease in renal transplant recipients.

Renal transplant recipients have a markedly increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with the general population, although considerably lower than that of patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis. CVD in transplant recipients is poorly characterised and differs from the nonrenal population, with a much higher proportion of fatal to nonfatal cardiac events. In addition to traditional ischaemic heart disease risk factors such as age, gender, diabetes and smoking, there are additional factors to consider in this population such as the importance of hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy and uraemic cardiomyopathy. There are factors specific to transplantation such immunosuppressive therapies and graft dysfunction which contribute to this altered risk profile. However, understanding and treatment is limited by the absence of large randomised intervention trials addressing risk factor modification, with the exception of the ALERT study. The approach to managing these patients should begin early and be multifactorial in nature.

Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk. However, a benefit of statins in such patients who are undergoing hemodialysis has not been proved. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial involving 2776 patients, 50 to 80 years of age, who were undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. We randomly assigned patients to receive rosuvastatin, 10 mg daily, or placebo. The combined primary end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included death from all causes and individual cardiac and vascular events. RESULTS: After 3 months, the mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels was 43% in patients receiving rosuvastatin, from a mean baseline level of 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter). During a median follow-up period of 3.8 years, 396 patients in the rosuvastatin group and 408 patients in the placebo group reached the primary end point (9.2 and 9.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio for the combined end point in the rosuvastatin group vs. the placebo group, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.11; P=0.59). Rosuvastatin had no effect on individual components of the primary end point. There was also no significant effect on all-cause mortality (13.5 vs. 14.0 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07; P=0.51). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing hemodialysis, the initiation of treatment with rosuvastatin lowered the LDL cholesterol level but had no significant effect on the composite primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00240331.)

Ischemia-induced renal expression of hyaluronan and CD44 in diabetic rats.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Unilateral renal ischemia during 30 min causes severe, non-reversible renal damage in diabetic (DM) rats, but not in nondiabetic rats. Hyaluronan (HA) is a glycosaminglycan involved in various forms of renal injury. We examined the role of HA and CD44, a major receptor for HA, in the development of postischemic renal injury in DM rats. METHODS: The left renal artery of streptozotocin diabetic Wistar rats was clamped for 30 min. The HA content in the kidneys was measured. A biotinylated HA-binding probe was used to localize HA. Inflammatory cells and other cells expressing CD44 were identified by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In ischemic DM kidneys the renal HA-content started to increase already after 24 h and significantly so after 1-8 weeks after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). The relative water content of the kidneys increased in parallel. HA started to appear in the cortex of ischemic DM kidneys 1 week after I/R. In contrast, the non-DM ischemic kidneys showed no increase of HA and water content after 1-8 weeks after I/R. The tubular cells in the cortex and outer medulla demonstrated increased staining for CD44. In the same compartments the increased numbers of infiltrating inflammatory cells also expressed CD44. CONCLUSION: HA-accumulation in the renal cortex might contribute to the renal damage seen after transient ischemia in DM rats by promoting inflammation through interaction between HA and CD44 expressing inflammatory cells. Furthermore, HA accumulation may contribute to an interstitial renal edema.

Why do we need a statin trial in hemodialysis patients?

BACKGROUND: The risk of cardiovascular complications is markedly increased in patients on dialysis treatment. This includes cardiac disease, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. The mortality in dialysis patients is markedly higher compared to a nonuremic population. There are several cardiovascular (CV) risk factors that are unique to this population, one of which is dyslipidemia. Uremic patients do not usually develop hypercholesterolemia, but rather are characterized by high levels of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglycerides, low high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and elevated levels of modified low density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, which are particularly harmful to the vascular wall. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) have been proven to be very efficient in reducing CV events in a nonrenal population. There are several landmark trials that have demonstrated that statins reduce the mortality in cardiovascular disease (CVD) in populations with normal, or close to normal, renal function. There are some observational registry data indicating that this may also be true in hemodialysis (HD) patients, but no prospective controlled trial has been performed to date. METHODS: We present the rationale for, and a brief outline of, a randomized placebo-controlled trial using a novel drug, rosuvastatin, in HD patients, to target cardiovascular events (the AURORA study). This study will include close to 3000 male and female HD patients, aged 50-80 years. The study is event driven and it has been estimated that it will run for a follow-up time close to four years. CONCLUSION: There is a sound rationale for making a randomized placebo-controlled statin trial in HD patients, with the objective to demonstrate an effect on CV mortality and morbidity.

Protective effect of insulin on ischemic renal injury in diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: An exceptional susceptibility to unilateral renal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury resulting in inflammation, fibrosis, atrophy of the kidney, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been demonstrated in the diabetic rat. The aim of this study was to examine whether insulin treatment would reduce I/R injury in diabetic kidneys. METHODS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) was induced in male Wistar rats by streptozotocin. I/R was achieved by clamping the left renal artery for 30 minutes. Treatment with long acting insulin was started 7 to 14 days before or one day after I/R. Short acting insulin was administrated 2 to 6 hours before the injury. Apoptosis was evaluated six hours after ischemia with the TUNEL-method. Four weeks after the clamping inulin clearance was measured and kidneys were removed for histopathological evaluation. RESULTS: In DM animals renal I/R caused massive induction of apoptosis in the renal medulla after six hours as well as inflammation, fibrosis, renal atrophy and anuria within four weeks. Treatment with long acting insulin before I/R resulted in decreased cell death and an almost complete protection of both renal function and histomorphology. Treatment with short acting insulin before I/R also decreased the loss of renal function. In contrast, insulin treatment after I/R did not protect the kidney from damage. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that insulin treatment with a subsequent improved metabolic control before renal I/R protected kidneys from ESRD.