Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Basic Res Cardiol ; 118(1): 31, 2023 08 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37580509

RESUMO

Pharmacological inhibition of factor Xa by rivaroxaban has been shown to mediate cardioprotection and is frequently used in patients with, e.g., atrial fibrillation. Rivaroxaban's anti-inflammatory actions are well known, but the underlying mechanisms are still incompletely understood. To date, no study has focused on the effects of rivaroxaban on the bone marrow (BM), despite growing evidence that the BM and its activation are of major importance in the development/progression of cardiovascular disease. Thus, we examined the impact of rivaroxaban on BM composition under homeostatic conditions and in response to a major cardiovascular event. Rivaroxaban treatment of mice for 7 days markedly diminished mature leukocytes in the BM. While apoptosis of BM-derived mature myeloid leukocytes was unaffected, lineage-negative BM cells exhibited a differentiation arrest at the level of granulocyte-monocyte progenitors, specifically affecting neutrophil maturation via downregulation of the transcription factors Spi1 and Csfr1. To assess whether this persists also in situations of increased leukocyte demand, mice were subjected to cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R): 7 d pretreatment with rivaroxaban led to reduced cardiac inflammation 72 h after I/R and lowered circulating leukocyte numbers. However, BM myelopoiesis showed a rescue of the leukocyte differentiation arrest, indicating that rivaroxaban's inhibitory effects are restricted to homeostatic conditions and are mainly abolished during emergency hematopoiesis. In translation, ST-elevation MI patients treated with rivaroxaban also exhibited reduced circulating leukocyte numbers. In conclusion, we demonstrate that rivaroxaban attenuates neutrophil maturation in the BM, which may offer a therapeutic option to limit overshooting of the immune response after I/R.


Assuntos
Medula Óssea , Rivaroxabana , Animais , Camundongos , Rivaroxabana/farmacologia , Neutrófilos , Hematopoese , Leucócitos , Células da Medula Óssea
2.
J Thromb Haemost ; 16(6): 1089-1098, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29582544

RESUMO

Essentials Successful outcome of platelet transfusion depends on specific antiplatelet therapy in use. We assessed if ticagrelor, clopidogrel or prasugrel impacts on donor platelet activity ex vivo. Ticagrelor and/or its active metabolite in plasma or bound to platelets can inhibit donor platelets. This might compromise the effectiveness of platelet transfusion therapy. SUMMARY: Background Platelet transfusion is the conventional approach to restore platelet function during acute bleeds or surgery, but successful outcome depends on the specific antiplatelet therapy. Notably ticagrelor is associated with inadequate recovery of platelet function after platelet transfusion. We examined whether plasma and/or platelets from ticagrelor-treated patients influence donor platelet function, in comparison with clopidogrel and prasugrel. Methods Platelet transfusion was mimicked ex vivo by mixing naïve donor platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or gel-filtered platelets (GFP) in defined proportions with PRP, plasma or GFP from cardiovascular patients receiving standard care including medication with prasugrel, clopidogrel or ticagrelor (n = 20 each). Blood was taken 4 h after the previous dose. HLA2/HLA28 haplotyping let us distinguish net (all platelet) and individual patient/donor platelet reactivity in mixtures of patient/donor platelets, measured by flow cytometry analysis of ADP-induced fibrinogen binding and CD62P expression. Results ADP responsiveness of donor platelets was dramatically reduced by even low (10%) concentrations of PRP or plasma from ticagrelor-treated patients. Clopidogrel and prasugrel were associated with more modest donor platelet inhibition. GFP from ticagrelor-treated patients but not patients receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel also suppressed donor GFP function upon mixing, suggesting the transfer of ticagrelor from patient platelets to donor platelets. This transfer did not lead to recovery of ADP responsiveness of patient's platelets. Conclusion Collectively, these observations support the concept that ticagrelor and/or its active metabolite in plasma or bound to platelets can inhibit donor platelets, which might compromise the effectiveness of platelet transfusion therapy.


Assuntos
Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Transfusão de Plaquetas , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Receptores Purinérgicos P2Y12/efeitos dos fármacos , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Testes de Função Plaquetária , Transfusão de Plaquetas/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efeitos adversos , Receptores Purinérgicos P2Y12/sangue , Fatores de Risco , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...