Subcutaneous Metastatic Adenocarcinoma: An Unusual Presentation of Colon Cancer - Case Report and Literature Review.

Subcutaneous metastasis from a visceral malignancy is rare with an incidence of 5.3%. Skin involvement as the presenting sign of a silent internal malignancy is an even rarer event occurring in approximately 0.8%. We report a case of a patient who presented to her dermatologist complaining of rapidly developing subcutaneous nodules which subsequently proved to be metastatic colon cancer, and we provide a review of the literature.

Pyoderma faciale.

Pyoderma faciale is a rare cutaneous disorder that predominantly affects women in their 20s and 30s and is characterized by the rapid appearance of coalescing nodules and draining sinuses, combined with livid erythema on the face. We describe a 40-year-old woman who presented with localized pyoderma faciale that worsened during treatment with oral and topical antibiotics and corticosteroids. Subsequent treatment with isotretinoin for 5 months resulted in dramatic and sustained improvement.

Congenital leukemia cutis.

We describe a premature neonate who was born with pancytopenia and a single subcutaneous nodule on her right lower extremity. A biopsy specimen from the nodule demonstrated a dense infiltrate of pleomorphic mononuclear cells that extended throughout the dermis and into the subcutaneous tissue. Immunohistochemical stains and bone marrow examination confirmed a diagnosis of acute myelogenous leukemia. Cytogenetic studies on peripheral blood by G-banding analysis revealed an abnormal karyotype of 46, XX, ins[inv(10)(p11.2q22.2);11](q22.2;q13.2q23.2). A split in the mixed lineage leukemia gene was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Induction chemotherapy was started but was complicated by multiorgan failure. The patient died on the eleventh day of life. As leukemia cutis more typically presents as multiple infiltrative papules, nodules, or plaques, we stress the importance of including leukemia in the differential diagnosis of a solitary nodule in a neonate.

Chronic arsenicism from Chinese herbal medicine.

Chronic arsenicism is associated with cutaneous manifestations, including palmoplantar keratoses, pigmentary anomalies, and nonmelanoma skin cancer. It occurs most commonly following exposure to inorganic arsenic in contaminated drinking water or occupational contact, though medicinal exposure also has been reported. We present a case of a Chinese woman living in the United States with cutaneous manifestations of chronic arsenicism due to a 5-year history of Chinese herbal medicine ingestion.

Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia.

Severe hypoglycemia, the most serious side effect of sulfonylurea therapy, has been reported to occur more frequently with glyburide than glimepiride. The present studies were undertaken to test the hypothesis that a differential effect on glucagon secretion may be involved. We performed hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic (approximately 2.5 mmol/L) clamps in 16 healthy volunteers who received in randomized order placebo, glyburide (10 mg), and glimepiride (4 mg) just before beginning the insulin infusion and measured plasma glucagon, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone levels during the clamp and during a 3-hour recovery period after discontinuation of the insulin infusion. Neither sulfonylurea altered glucagon responses or those of other counterregulatory hormones (except cortisol) during the clamp. However, glyburide delayed plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia (plasma glucose at end of recovery period: control, 4.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; glyburide, 3.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; P = .0001; glimepiride, 4.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/L; P = .08). Despite lower plasma glucose levels, glyburide stimulated insulin secretion during this period (0.89 +/- 0.13 vs 1.47 +/- 0.15 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), control vs glyburide; P = .001), whereas glimepiride did not (P = .08). Short-term administration of glyburide or glimepiride did not alter glucagon responses during hypoglycemia. In contrast, during recovery from hypoglycemia, glyburide but not glimepiride inappropriately stimulates insulin secretion at low plasma glucose levels. This differential effect on insulin secretion may be an important factor in explaining why glyburide causes severe hypoglycemia more frequently than glimepiride.