Correlation of imaging characteristics of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the surgical approach with improvement for postoperative neck pain and neural function: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Complex degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (DCM) is characterized by a variety of complex imaging features. The surgical method for DCM remains controversial. This study aimed to examine the correlation between the imaging characteristics of DCM with varying degrees of complexity and the surgical approach and clinical outcome. Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving retrospective data collection was performed. A total of 139 patients with DCM who underwent surgery between January 2015 and January 2018 in the Orthopedics Department of Shanxi Bethune Hospital were divided into 3 groups according to the complexity of imaging features: 18 patients in the mild group, 66 patients in the moderate group, and 55 patients in the severe group. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to compare the effects of neck pain and neural function prior to surgery according to the rate of improvement as of the last follow-up. Routine X-ray films were obtained at the follow-up of 3-6 months. The necessity of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations was determined based on clinical findings and X-ray images. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare groups, the least significant difference (LSD) test was used for multiple comparisons, and the Chi-square test was used to compare classification indicators (imaging manifestations, gender), with P<0.05 being statistically significant. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the primary influencing factors of the JOA recovery rate. Results: In all three groups, JOA and VAS scores at the final follow-up were significantly higher than those before surgery (P<0.001). There were significant differences in the preoperative VAS and JOA scores between any two groups, as well as in the VAS and JOA scores and improvement rates at the last follow-up between the mild group and the moderate group and between the mild group and the severe group (P<0.001). Age, preoperative JOA scores, MRI intramedullary hyperintensity signal, and the degree of spinal cord compression were primarily related to the nervous system recovery rate (P<0.001). Conclusions: Age, MRI intramedullary hyperintensity signal, degree of spinal cord compression, and other variables were associated with the improvement of neural function in patients with DCM. Therefore, in addition to the JOA improvement rate or VAS score, additional factors, such as the patient's condition, the improvement in quality of life, and the patient's financial capacity, should be considered in evaluating the improvement of postoperative neck pain and neural function.

Biomechanical evaluation of Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

In order to analyze and evaluate the stability of lumbar spine and the risk of cage subsidence after different minimally invasive fusion operations, two finite element models Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) were established. The results showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, PE-PLIF had better segmental stability, lower pedicle screw rod system stress, and lower risk of cage subsidence. The results suggest that the cage with appropriate height should be selected to ensure the segmental stability and avoid the risk of the subsidence caused by the cage with large height.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw short-segment fixation and fusion in the treatment of atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the clinical efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion in treating atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of unilateral and bilateral fixation and fusion for atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation and to explore the feasibility of the unilateral surgical procedure. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation were included in the study from June 2013 to May 2018. They were divided into a unilateral fixation group and a bilateral fixation group (14 patients in each group with an average age of 43.6 ± 16.3 years and 51.8 ± 15.4 years, respectively). The unilateral group had a unilateral anatomical variation of the pedicle or vertebral artery, or traumatic pedicle destruction. All patients underwent atlantoaxial unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion. Intraoperative blood loss and operation time were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring systems were used to evaluate pre- and postoperative occipital-neck pain and neurological function. X-ray and computerized tomography (CT) were used to assess atlantoaxial stability, the implants' position, and bone graft fusion. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 39-71 months postoperatively. Intraoperatively, no spinal cord or vertebral artery injury was observed. At the last follow-up, occipital-neck pain and neurological function in the two groups were significantly improved (P< 0.05). The X-ray films and CT showed satisfactory atlantoaxial stability, implant position, and osseous fusion in all the patients at 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation and fusion can restore atlantoaxial stability and improve occipital-neck pain and neurological function in patients with atlantoaxial fracture-dislocation. The unilateral surgical procedure can be a supplementary option for patients with unilateral abnormal atlantoaxial lesions.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Vs. Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Background: Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion is a new technology that is mostly used for single-segment and unilateral lumbar spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to introduce percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF) with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spondylolisthesis and evaluate the efficacy by comparing it with open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Methods: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in PE-PLIF with the ULBD group and the open PLIF group. The perioperative data of the two groups were compared to evaluate the safety of PE-PLIF with ULBD. The visual analog scale (VAS) back pain, VAS leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores of the two groups preoperatively and postoperatively were compared to evaluate clinical efficacy. Preoperative and postoperative imaging data were collected to evaluate the effectiveness of the operation. Results: No differences in baseline data were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). The operation time in PE-PLIF with the ULBD group (221.2 ± 32.9 min) was significantly longer than that in the PLIF group (138.4 ± 25.7 min) (p < 0.05), and the estimated blood loss and postoperative hospitalization were lower than those of the PLIF group (p < 0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.05), but the postoperative VAS back pain score in the PE-PLIF group was significantly lower than that in the PLIF group (p < 0.05). The excellent and good rates in both groups were 96.4% according to MacNab's criteria. The disc height and cross-sectional area of the spinal canal were significantly improved in the two groups after surgery (p < 0.05), with no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The fusion rates in PE-PLIF with the ULBD group and the PLIF group were 89.3% and 92.9% (p > 0.05), respectively, the cage subsidence rates were 14.3% and 17.9% (p > 0.05), respectively, and the lumbar spondylolisthesis reduction rates were 92.72 ± 6.39% and 93.54 ± 5.21%, respectively (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The results from this study indicate that ULBD can be successfully performed during PE-PLIF, and the combined procedure is a safe and reliable treatment method for lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Recent Advances in Clinical Diagnosis and Pharmacotherapy Options of Membranous Nephropathy.

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome among adults, which is the leading glomerular disease that recurs after kidney transplantation. Treatment for MN remained controversial and challenging, partly owing to absence of sensitive and specific biomarkers and effective therapy for prediction and diagnosis of disease activity. MN starts with the formation and deposition of circulating immune complexes on the outer area in the glomerular basement membrane, leading to complement activation. The identification of autoantibodies against the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing protein 7A (THSD7A) antigens illuminated a distinct pathophysiological rationale for MN treatments. Nowadays, detection of serum anti-PLA2R antibodies and deposited glomerular PLA2R antigen can be routinely applied to MN. Anti-PLA2R antibodies exhibited much high specificity and sensitivity. Measurement of PLA2R in immune complex deposition allows for the diagnosis of PLA2R-associated MN in patients with renal biopsies. In the review, we critically summarized newer diagnosis biomarkers including PLA2R and THSD7A tests and novel promising therapies by using traditional Chinese medicines such as Astragalus membranaceus, Tripterygium wilfordii, and Astragaloside IV for the treatment of MN patients. We also described unresolved questions and future challenges to reveal the diagnosis and treatments of MN. These unprecedented breakthroughs were quickly translated to clinical diagnosis and management. Considerable advances of detection methods played a critical role in diagnosis and monitoring of treatment.

Host/microbiota interactions-derived tryptophan metabolites modulate oxidative stress and inflammation via aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that induces the expression of a broad range of downstream genes such as cytochromes P450 enzymes and cyclooxygenase-2. Recent research focuses are shifting from AhR activation induced by xenobiotics to its response patterns to physiological ligands that expand our understanding of how endogenous metabolites as ligands to modulate AhR signaling pathway under homeostasis and pathological conditions. With increasing interest in AhR and its endogenous ligands, it would seem advisable to summarize a variety of endogenous ligands especially host/gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites. Mounting evidence has indicated that AhR play a critical role in the regulation of redox homeostasis and immune responses. In this review, we outline the canonical and non-canonical AhR signalling pathway that is mediated by host/gut microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites. Through several typical endogenous AhR ligands, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of AhR-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in the pathological milieu, including diabetes, diabetic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Finally, we summarize and emphasize the limitations and breakthrough of endogenous AhR ligands from host/microbial tryptophan catabolites. This review might provide novel diagnostic and prognostic approach for refractory human diseases and establish new therapeutic strategies for AhR activation.

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion has become an emerging technique. Some researchers have reported the technique of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. We propose percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF) as an alternative approach. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of PE-PLIF by comparing percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in each group. Demographic data, perioperative data, and radiological parameters were collected prospectively. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. RESULTS: The background data were comparable between the two groups. The mean operation time was longer in the PE-PLIF group. The PE-PLIF group showed benefits in less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. VAS and ODI scores significantly improved in both groups. However, the VAS score of low-back pain was lower in the PE-PLIF group. The satisfaction rate was 96.7% in both groups. The radiological outcomes were similar in both groups. In the PE-PLIF group, the fusion rate was 93.3%, and the cage subsidence rate was 6.7%; in the open PLIF group, the fusion and cage subsidence rates were 96.7% and 16.7%. There were minor complications in one patient in the PE-PLIF group and two in the open PLIF group. CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed that PE-PLIF is safe and effective compared with open PLIF. In addition, this minimally invasive technique may enhance postoperative recovery by reducing tissue damage and blood loss.