RESUMO
Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical significance of individualized formular administration of tacrolimus after renal transplantation based on the CYP3A5 and MDR1 gene polymorphism.Methods Total 129 renal transplantation recipients from Oct.1,2015 to July 30,2016 were included in this study and divided into 2 groups.In experimental group,tacrolimus was administrated by the individualized formula based on CYP3A5 and MDR1 gene polymorphism;in control group,tacrolimus was administrated by doctors' experience based on patient's body weight.The blood trough level of tacrolimus was determined 3 days after administration.The first blood trough level of tacrolimus,plasma creatinine level,acute rejection rate,and necessity for dialysis were compared between two groups.Results The first blood trough levels of tacrolimus in experimental and control groups were 9.24 ± 2.32 and 9.39 ± 3.47μg/L respectively (P＞0.05).The tacrolimus levels of 7 cases in experimental group and 18 cases in control group were not in normal range (P＜0.05).The plasma creatinine level at day 7 after surgery was 157.36 ± 110.55 μg/L in experimental group,and 174.01 ± 130.68μg/L in control group (P＞0.05).Acute rejection was found in both two groups:2 in experimental group and 5 in control group (P ＞ 0.05).There was significant difference in necessity for dialysis between two groups:4 in experimental group and 10 in control group (P＜0.05).Conclusion The individualized formular administration of tacrolimus based on the CYP3A5 and MDR1 gene polymorphism is more feasible and reasonable than experimental administration,which is more easier to come to an appropriate blood level and would benefit the early recovery of renal function.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the application of inguinal incision in retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy(LNU)in the treatment of upper urinary urothelial carcinoma(UUUC).Methods From Mar.2007 to Jan.2012,186 retroperitoneal LNU procedures on 115 males and 71 females for the treatment of UUUC were performed in our institute.All cases were grouped as inguinal incision group(n =112)and lumbar incision group(n =74)according to specimen retrieval incision.Operative time,estimated blood loss,postoperative analgesia,hospital stay,incision complications,cosmetic satisfaction and tumor recurrence were compared between the 2 groups.Results All the 186 cases of operation were successfully accomplished.There were no differences in tumor stage,tumor grade,mean operative time,blood loss between the 2 groups.In inguinal incision group,the incidence of incision fat liquefaction,incision hernia,incision bulging,lumboabdominal unsymmetry and postoperative analgesia was less than that of lumbar incision group.In inguinal incision group,the mean hospital stay was shorter,cosmetic satisfaction(Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲ)was better(7/24/81 versus 22/18/34,P ＜ 0.01).Recurrence rate of UUUC in middle and inferior segment of ureter was fewer than that of lumbar incision group(5.3％ versus 35.0％,P ＜0.01).Conclusion Retroperitoneal LNU for UUUC combined with inguinal incision offers advantage of less trauma,less complications,higher cosmetic satisfaction and lower tumor recurrence.
RESUMO
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical outcome of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LUNT) for native upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UC) in renal transplant (RT) recipients.Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis on 1130 RT recipients,and 9 patients (0.8％,9/1130) with native upper tract UC were identified. UC was confirmed pathologically in the 9 patients,including 3 cases of unilateral ureter tumor (2 on the right,and 1 on the left),4 cases of unilateral renal pelvis tumor (2 on the right,2 on the left),1 case of bilateral ureter tumor and 1 case of tumor in the right ureter and left kidney.Females predominated (8/9) in the 9 patients with upper tract UC.The patients with left upper urinary tract cancer underwent LUNT using a retroperitoneal approach with a technique of transurethral circumcision of the ureteral orifice.The patients with right upper urinary tract cancer were subjected to nephroureterctomy with ureterectomy and bladder cuff excision by complete laparascopy through a transperitoneal approach. Immunosuppressive protocol conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus was performed on all cases. Results In the 9 patients,11 LUNTs were performed successfully without conversion to open surgery.The follow-up period was from 6 to 48 months. One patient died of lung metastasis at 8th month after tumor excision,and 1 patient displayed ductal cancer of the left breast at 7th month after LNUT.Another seven patients showed no evidence of disease during the follow-up period with normal renal function.ConclusionOur present clinical experience suggested that LNUT for the native upper tract cancer in renal transplant recipients is feasible,safe,and effective.
RESUMO
Objective To compare the safety of laparoscopic live donor nephreetomy(LDN) and open live donor nephrectomy(ODN), evaluate the kidney function and blood pressure of living donors during 1 year follow-up. Methods Thirty cases of LDN and 30 eases of ODN were retrospectively reviewed. The operation time, warm ischemia time, operative blood loss, time to post-operative intake and time to ambulation of the 2 grouups were compared. According to the modified Clavien classifica-tion system procedure-related complications were described and compared. Serum creatinine(SCr) le-vels, blood pressure and 24-h urine protein excretion were measured before nephreetomy and 1 d, 7 d, 3 months, 6 and 12 months after nephrectomy. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured preo-pratively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. These data were statistically analyzed. Results The operation time was (98. 6+13. 6)rain and (96.3+19. 5)rain in the LDN and ODN groups, re- spectively. Warm ischemia time in the LDN group was (90.6±15.1)s, in the ODN group was (86.4±12.3)s. Operative blood loss was (105.2±634.8)ml and (206.3±126.4)ml in the LDN and ODN groups(P<0.01). For the time to post-operative intake and time to ambulation, LDN group was (28.5±2.9)h and (25.8±63.8)h, ODN group was (38.6±63.3)h and (36.5±65.3)h(P<0.01). Perioperative complications rates were 6.6%(2/30) and 23.3%(7/30) for LDN and ODN, respective-ly. SCr was (109.1±7.5), (105.4±69.5), (96.6±10.7), (89.4±11.5), (91.6±69.3)/zmol/L in the LDN group and (107.3±69.6), (103.3±68.4), (95.4±69.1), (90.5±13.6), (90.3±11.7)μmol/L in the ODN group 1 day, 7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after nephrectomy. The mean GFR of LDN and ODN was 64.7 and 65.8 ml/min at 6 months after nephrectomy, 65.9 and 67.5 ml/min at 12 months postoperatively, which were significantly different comparing with preoperative mean GFR in each group(P<0.05) but no significant difference was found between 6 months and 12 months after nephrectomy and between the 2 groups at the same time point respectively(P>0.05). Mean 24 h protein excretion was elevated after either LDN or ODN during 1 year followup, but was not significantly different either between predonation and 1 year after nephrectomy or between the 2 groups at the same period. Blood pressure increased or decreased slightly with the duration of follow-up,no significant blood presure changes were found before and after nephrectomy or between the two groups at the same period postoperatively. Conclusions LDN has the advantages of minimal trauma, less operative blood loss and quicker convalescence. It is safe and and has no adverse effects regarding kidney function and blood pressure during the first year after living kidney donation comparing to ODN.
