Assessing the steroid-sparing effect of biological agents in randomized controlled trials for lupus: a scoping review.

Prompt disease control of flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a priority in treatment strategy planning. However, the long-term dosage-related collateral effects of glucocorticoids (GCs) have pushed researchers towards the identification and utilization of novel biological agents that could both induce and maintain low disease activity and remission, especially in the context of lupus nephritis (LN). This scoping review aims at assessing the current evidence of the potential steroid-sparing effect of biologic therapies by reviewing phase II and phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving SLE/LN patients. A scoping review of the literature was carried out in accordance with PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Risk of bias was assessed through the utilization of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (treatment drug, 7 belimumab; 1 anifrolumab). Four studies showed a definite steroid-sparing effect (treatment drug, 3 belimumab; 1 anifrolumab), while in the remaining four RCTs, the steroid-sparing effect was not observed. When focusing on phase III trials, the overall quality of the studies resulted fair or good considering the risk of bias. However, a degree of heterogeneity of steroid regimen protocol (considering initial dosage, tapering and rescue treatment allowance) was observed. While a growing body of evidence is supporting the safety and efficacy of biological treatment in SLE, the evidence on their steroid-sparing effect remains scattered. Future research needs to pursue the identification of precise SLE clusters of patients who would benefit most from a specific treatment protocol with a definite steroid-sparing effect.

[Cancer and the Kidney: A Deadly Embrace].

A deadly embrace occurs between cancer and chronic kidney disease. The estimation of kidney function in cancer patients is of utmost interest due to its direct impact on chemotherapy dosing, selection, and eligibility for chemotherapeutics. Overestimating kidney function (determined as estimated glomerular filtration rate -eGFR) can lead to overdosing and drug toxicity, while underestimating kidney function can prevent patients from receiving novel therapies. Notably, the current measures of eGFR are not validated in transplanted patients yet. The field of onconephrology ranges from nephrotoxicity of existing and novel therapeutics, paraproteinemias, and cancer-associated electrolyte imbalance, fluid and acid-base disturbances, the effects of the destruction of cancer cells, and acute and/or chronic kidney injuries. Recently, the therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with new agents that interfere with specific proteins involved in oncogenesis. These are the so-called target therapies, which although acquired as "targeted" therapies do not have absolute specificity and selectivity and tend to inhibit multiple targets, often involving the kidney. Renal biopsy may be critical in managing these adverse effects. Moreover, primary hematological and oncological disorders can have significant kidney implications in the form of glomerular or nonglomerular diseases presenting with proteinuria, hematuria, hypertension, and kidney function decline, specifically including cast nephropathy or systemic light chain amyloidosis, and paraneoplastic glomerulopathies that occur as a result of occult malignancy, such as Membranous Nephropathy and Minimal Change disease.

[Management of the Oncological Patient with Chronic Renal Failure].

Cancer is a leading cause of death in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The incidence of CKD in patients with cancer is higher than in the non-cancer population. Across various populations, CKD is associated with an elevated risk of cancer incidence and cancer death compared with people without CKD, although the risks are cancer site-specific. The potential mechanisms for the increased risk of cancer observed in CKD, include patient factors, disease, and treatment factors. CKD has also a major impact on the treatment of cancer patients. The kidney is the primary route of elimination of many anticancer drugs. Dosing of anticancer agents according to kidney function is essential to avoid undertreatment and toxicity. Because of the systemic exclusion of patients with severe kidney dysfunction from clinical cancer trials, data are lacking to guide dosing of anticancer drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease. As a consequence, many therapies are denied to CKD patients due to their possible toxicities. An orchestrated effort by all stakeholders is required to fill the knowledge gap and improve the outcome of cancer patients with kidney dysfunction.

[Renal Replacement Therapy in Cancer Patients with AKI].

Acute renal failure (AKI) is a high-prevalence complication in patients with cancer. The risk of AKI after cancer diagnosis is 18% in the first year, 27% in the fifth year, and 40% of critically ill patients with cancer require renal replacement therapy. The causes of AKI may be pre-renal due to hemodynamic problems, related to the cancer, metabolic complications, and drug or surgical treatment. One must preventively protect renal function by hydration, use of non-nephrotoxic drugs, correction of anemia, prevention of contrast agent-induced AKI (CI-AKI), and adjustment of cancer therapy in patients with CKD. It is essential to check basal renal function, creatinine trend, electrolytes, urinalysis and proteinuria, perform imaging, renal biopsy if necessary. The evaluation of patients should be multidisciplinary and timely including the initiation of renal replacement treatment (RRT). There are different modalities of replacement treatment depending on the clinical picture of the patient with AKI and cancer: intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), intermittent prolonged replacement therapy (PIRRT), and continuous replacement therapy (CRRT). The concept of dose administered, as opposed to prescribed dose, as well as the anticoagulation of extracorporeal circuits, which must be regional with citrate (RCA) as the first choice in the management of CRRT, turns out to be fundamental in order to achieve optimal circuit anticoagulation, with reduction of coagulation episodes and downtime, while maintaining the patient's coagulation status. The onco-nephrologic multidisciplinary approach is crucial to reduce the mortality rate, which is still high in this category of patients.

[Renal Side Effects of Novel Molecular Targeted Oncologic Agents].

The introduction of innovative therapies has changed the scenario of complications. The delay in the recognition of kidney adverse effects is partly due to the timing of the development of the kidney damage which occurs later than the observation period of registration studies, and partly to the exclusion of patients with known kidney impairment from registration trials. Renal disease has a significant impact on the management of cancer patients and often leads to discontinuation of therapy. Histological evaluations of kidney disorders induced by targeted/immunotherapy are very limited. Renal biopsy is critical for the management of renal toxicities and should be especially encouraged for patients showing adverse renal effects to novel cancer agents. We recently examined the histological features of patients treated with new cancer agents who underwent renal biopsy for new onset renal failure and/or urinary abnormalities. The cohort included 42 patients. The most frequently administered therapies were immunotherapy (54.8%) and anti-angiogenic treatments (45.2%). The most common adverse effect was tubular interstitial nephritis in the first group and thrombotic microangiopathy in the second one. Based on histological findings, definitive discontinuation of treatment could be restricted to a very limited number of patients. All of them had anti-VEGF-related TMA. Treatment discontinuation was unneeded in patients treated with ICIs. In patients treated with multidrug therapy, the histological findings made it possible to identify the weight of drug-related specific injury. Based on this data, renal biopsy should be considered in every cancer patient who develops urinary abnormalities or shows a worsening of renal function during treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

[Management of Cast Nephropathy].

Myeloma cast nephropathy is the most common cause of acute kidney injury in patients affected by multiple myeloma. The mainstay of management of cast nephropathy is the clone-based therapy by reducing production and thereby precipitation of light chains. Adjuvant therapy consists of inducing high urine volume flow and alkalinisation, where possible. Extracorporeal removal of light chains is still debated and the advantages of these procedures are not established. The use of safe and low expensive membranes may encourage their use and address their utility.

Relevance of next generation sequencing (NGS) data re-analysis in the diagnosis of monogenic diseases leading to organ failure.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, our center started a program to offer genetic diagnosis to patients with kidney and liver monogenic rare conditions, potentially eligible for organ transplantation. We exploited a clinical exome sequencing approach, followed by analyses of in silico gene panels tailored to clinical suspicions, obtaining detection rates in line with what reported in literature. However, a percentage of patients remains without a definitive genetic diagnosis. This work aims to evaluate the utility of NGS data re-analysis for those patients with an inconclusive or negative genetic test at the time of first analysis considering that (i) the advance of alignment and variant calling processes progressively improve the detection rate, limiting false positives and false negatives; (ii) gene panels are periodically updated and (iii) variant annotation may change over time. METHODS: 114 patients, recruited between 2018 and 2020, with an inconclusive or negative NGS report at the time of first analysis, were included in the study. Re-alignment and variant calling of previously generated sequencing raw data were performed using the GenomSys Variant Analyzer software. RESULTS: 21 previously not reported potentially causative variants were identified in 20 patients. In most cases (n = 19), causal variants were retrieved out of the re-classification from likely benign to variants of unknown significance (VUS). In one case, the variant was included because of inclusion in the analysis of a newly disease-associated gene, not present in the original gene panel, and in another one due to the improved data alignment process. Whenever possible, variants were validated with Sanger sequencing and family segregation studies. As of now, 16 out of 20 patients have been analyzed and variants confirmed in 8 patients. Specifically, in two pediatric patients, causative variants were de novo mutations while in the others, the variant was present also in other affected relatives. In the remaining patients, variants were present also in non-affected parents, raising questions on their re-classification. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data indicate that periodic and systematic re-analysis of negative or inconclusive NGS data reports can lead to new variant identification or reclassification in a small but significant proportion of cases, with benefits for patients' management.

The need for kidney biopsy in the management of side effects of target and immunotherapy.

Introduction: The introduction of innovative therapies, resulting from revisiting cancer as a disease of the immune system, has changed the scenario of complications. These new classes of drugs, such as targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, assure substantial advantages in cancer therapy, despite some side effects affecting various organs, including the kidney. Histological evaluations of kidney disorders induced by targeted/immunotherapy are limited. Method: In this study we examined the histological features of patients treated with new cancer agents who underwent a kidney biopsy for new onset kidney failure and/or urinary abnormalities. Results: The cohort included 30 adult patients. The most frequently administered therapies were immunotherapy (30%), targeted therapy (26.7%), immunotherapy plus targeted therapy (13.3%), immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (13.3%), targeted therapy plus chemotherapy (16.7%). The most common histological finding was tubular interstitial nephritis (30%) that was associated with acute tubular necrosis in 4 cases, and thrombotic microangiopathy (23.3%). After kidney biopsy, 16 of the 30 patients were treated according to the histological diagnosis. Fourteen patients were treated with steroids. One patient with membranous nephropathy was treated with a single dose of rituximab. A patient with severe thrombotic microangiopathy requiring dialysis received a treatment with eculizumab for 3 months. Overall some renal response was obtained in all patients treated with glucocorticoids, while complete kidney response was achieved in the patient treated with rituximab. Cancer treatment was resumed without change in 21 out of 30 patients. Conclusion: Kidney biopsy is critical for the management of kidney toxicities and should be strongly encouraged for patients showing adverse kidney effects of novel cancer agents.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Kidney Involvement.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the development of autoantibodies and the impairment of the coagulation system. Knowledge about this syndrome is increasing over time, but kidney involvement, especially APS nephropathy, still represents a challenge for physicians. SUMMARY: A "two hit" model has been hypothesized to explain APS pathophysiology, and the role played by some factors, such as the complement system, is becoming more and more clear. From a clinical point of view, along with thrombosis in any site and/or obstetric morbidities, that are the hallmarks of APS, a constellation of several other clinical symptoms is related to APS. These symptoms alone are not sufficient to fulfill Sydney criteria for APS and this could potentially lead to omitting some diagnoses. The mainstay of management of APS is antithrombotic therapy, but there are expectations for new drugs that regulate the immune system. APS could affect the kidneys in many ways and among them, APS nephropathy is an intriguing entity that has been overlooked in recent years. Novel studies on APS nephropathy are lacking. KEY MESSAGES: In this review, we discuss what we currently know about APS and its relationship with the kidney, with an eye toward the future perspectives. Multicenter studies on APS nephropathy are necessary in order to develop targeted therapies.

Safety and efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in patients with glomerular diseases who received rituximab.

Background: Patients on B-cell-depleting agents may have a suboptimal response to vaccination, placing them at a higher risk of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or suffering from a more severe prognosis. Indeed, available data on pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) in subjects with glomerular diseases (GDs) who received rituximab are limited. Methods: We conducted a prospective study analysing the safety and efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab for pre-exposure prophylaxis in patients with GDs who received rituximab in the previous 12 months. The rates of symptomatic infections and hospitalizations were compared with those for patients with GD treated with rituximab who refused to receive tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Results: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab was administered to 22 patients (12 females, mean age 58.4 ± 19.6 years) with GD diagnoses including membranous nephropathy, lupus nephritis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. No patient treated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab experienced symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the follow-up (mean observation time of follow-up was 112 ± 23 days), while 11 of 28 controls (39.3%) reported a symptomatic infection (P = .0001), requiring hospitalization in 2 cases. Reported adverse events were mild, namely self-limiting headache [4], discomfort at the injection site [3], flu-like symptoms/myalgia [3] and fever [1]. No serious adverse events (e.g. cardiac events, anaphylaxis) were reported. Conclusion: Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab seems safe and lowered the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection by ≈40% in vaccinated subjects with GD who received anti-CD20 therapy. Possible applications in the subset of patients who need immunosuppressive therapy, especially with rituximab, in a pandemic setting might be envisaged.

Daratumumab monotherapy for refractory lupus nephritis.

Treatment-refractory lupus nephritis (LN) has a high risk of a poor outcome and is often life-threatening. Here we report a case series of six patients (one male and five females) with a median age of 41.3 years (range, 20-61 years) with refractory LN who received renal biopsies and were subsequently treated with intravenous daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (weekly for 8 weeks, followed by eight biweekly infusions and up to eight monthly infusions). One patient did not show any improvement after 6 months of therapy, and daratumumab was discontinued. In five patients, the mean disease activity, as assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity 2000 index, decreased from 10.8 before treatment to 3.6 at 12 months after treatment. Mean proteinuria (5.6 g per 24 h to 0.8 g per 24 h) and mean serum creatinine (2.3 mg dl-1 to 1.5 mg dl-1) also decreased after 12 months. Improvement of clinical symptoms was accompanied by seroconversion of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies; decreases in median interferon-gamma levels, B cell maturation antigen and soluble CD163 levels; and increases in C4 and interleukin-10 levels. These data suggest that daratumumab monotherapy warrants further exploration as a potential treatment for refractory LN.

Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis can be effectively treated using an intensive B-cell depletion therapy.

Background: Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) is a histologic lesion rather than a specific disease entity and represents a cluster of different conditions affecting both children and adults that includes primary, secondary and genetically mediated forms. These forms can be distinguished by electron microscopy and genetic assessment and show different responsiveness to steroids and immunosuppressants. Despite some promising effects of rituximab in nephrotic syndrome in children, the results in adults with FSGS are disappointing. Our group previously explored the effectiveness of rituximab in eight adult patients with unselected forms of FSGS and achieved a consistent reduction in proteinuria in one case. Following this experience, we developed an alternative therapeutic option intended to enhance the potential of rituximab with the support of other synergic drugs. We herein report the results of this therapeutic protocol (six administrations of rituximab plus two of intravenous cyclophosphamide plus glucocorticoids) in seven prospectively enrolled patients with extensive podocyte effacement and recurrent relapses or steroid dependence. Results: Patients had a median baseline serum creatinine level of 2.2 mg/dl (range 1-4.7) that decreased to 1.1 mg/dl (range 0.9-2.2) and 1.1 mg/dl (range 0.75-2.21) after 3 and 6 months, respectively, and remained unchanged at 12 months. Three of five patients with renal failure turned to normal function while the other two patients maintained a stable impairment after 18 and 52 months. The median proteinuria decreased from 6.1 g/24 h to 3.5, 3.5 and 1.9 g/24 h at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Specifically, five of seven patients had a partial response at 12 months and became non-nephrotic. One of them had a complete response at 18 months and was still in complete remission at the last follow-up visit at 36 months. Proteinuria persisted unchanged in two of seven patients with a genetic-related disease. No serious late adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Our results show that intensive B-cell depletion therapy is able to reverse the nephrotic syndrome of steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing adult patients with putatively idiopathic FSGS (i.e. with extensive podocyte effacement).

The steroid-sparing effects of a mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen in the management of immunoglobulin A nephropathy in patients with histologically active lesions: A comparison with a control cohort receiving conventional therapy.

INTRODUCTION: While the use of different immunosuppressants has been investigated in immunoglobulin A nephropathy, further investigation is needed to assess the effect of a regimen of mycophenolate mofetil combined with a short course of glucocorticosteroids in the subset of patients with histologically active features. We compared the efficacy and safety of a combined regimen of mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticosteroids to a conventional regimen of glucocorticosteroids alone in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy who have active lesions and major urinary abnormalities. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 30 immunoglobulin A nephropathy patients with active histological lesions, 15 of whom were treated with both mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day for 6 months and 3 pulses of 15 mg/kg methylprednisolone, followed by a short tapering schedule of oral prednisone. The control group was made up of the remaining 15 clinically- and histologically-matched patients treated with glucocorticosteroids alone according to a validated schedule, i.e., 1 g of methylprednisolone given intravenously for 3 consecutive days, followed by oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg every other day for 6 months. At diagnosis, all patients had urinary protein excretion > 1 g/24 h and microscopic hematuria. RESULTS: At the end of the first year of follow-up (30 patients) and after 5 years (17 patients), there were no differences between the two groups in terms of urinary abnormalities and functional parameters. Both regimens achieved a statistically significant decrease in 24-h urinary protein excretion (p < 0.001) and a reduction of microscopic hematuria. However, the mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen allowed a cumulative sparing dose of 6 g of glucocorticosteroids. CONCLUSION: In this single center study on immunoglobulin A nephropathy patients with active lesions and major urinary abnormalities and at increased risk of glucocorticosteroid-related complications, a mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen demonstrated similar outcomes in terms of complete response and relapse (at 1 and 5 years) compared to a conventional glucocorticosteroid-based protocol, while achieving a consistent reduction of glucocorticosteroid cumulative dose.

Chasing the Zebra: a case of membranous-like Glomerulopathy with SSA/RO52 deposits and no overt connective tissue disease.

BACKGROUND: The nature of the deposits in immune-mediated glomerulonephritis with a membranous pattern and masked IgG-Kappa deposits (MGMID) remains still to be elucidated. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of 33-year-old woman developing a continuous asymptomatic proteinuria (0.8-1 g/24 h) with no overt connective tissue diseases. She tested positive at high titers for SSA antibodies (Ro52 838 UI/mL, Ro60 2716 UI/mL) and at the kidney biopsy histological findings were compatible with an immune-mediated glomerulonephritis with a membranous pattern and masked IgG-Kappa deposits. Also, we demonstrated a positive immunohistochemistry staining for anti-Ro52-SSA antibodies, with a granular positivity in mesangium and along rare glomerular capillaries. To date, only one case of a patient with overt diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome with MGMID has been described but a pathogenic role for SSA and SSB antibodies has never been proven. CONCLUSIONS: In this case, we described for the first time by immunohistochemistry a Ro52+ granular positivity in the mesangium and glomerular capillaries, potentially paving the way for a better understanding of MGMID.

Clinical-Pathological Characteristics of Renal Injuries Identify Different Clusters in Patients With Antiphospholipid Antibodies.

Introduction: Significant heterogeneity still exists in the nomenclature of renal involvement in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Methods: We applied a hierarchical cluster analysis to determine subgroups of patients according to clinical, laboratory, and renal histology characteristics in a cohort of subjects with confirmed antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) positivity and biopsy proven aPL-related renal injuries. Kidney outcomes were then assessed at 12 months. Results: A total of 123 aPL-positive patients were included in the study (101 [82%] female, 109 [88.6%] with systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], 14 (11.4%) with primary APS [PAPS]). Three clusters were identified. Twenty-three patients (18.7%) were included in the first cluster (cluster 1), characterized by a higher prevalence of glomerular capillary and arteriolar thrombi and fragmented red blood cells in the subendothelial space. Cluster 2 included 33 patients (26.8%) and showed a higher prevalence of fibromyointimal proliferative lesions as seen in hyperplastic vasculopathy. Cluster 3 was the largest (67 patients, mainly with SLE) and was characterized by higher prevalence of subendothelial edema, of both glomerular capillaries and arterioles. Conclusion: Three different clusters of patients with aPL and renal injuries emerged from our study as follows: the first, with the worst renal prognosis, was associated with features of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), thrombosis, triple aPL positivity and higher adjusted Global APS Score (aGAPSS) values; the second, characterized by hyperplastic vasculopathy with an intermediate prognosis, was seen more frequently in patients with cerebrovascular manifestations; and the third, more benign in terms of outcomes and with no overt association with thrombotic features, was characterized by endothelial swelling in concomitant lupus nephritis (LN).

Refractory Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Identification and Pharmacological Management.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by an aberrant immune response, leading to an extremely heterogeneous clinical presentation, potentially affecting different systems and organs. Despite the fact that SLE mortality has greatly decreased since the introduction of steroids, some forms of refractory/severe SLE still have the potential to result in permanent organ damage as well as increased mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, SLE patients with multiple comorbidities may face a clinical conundrum and have a bad prognosis. An improved prognosis for severe refractory SLE depends on prompt and appropriate treatment. Due to the scarcity of solid data from a well-characterized group of patients with refractory/severe SLE coming from randomized controlled studies, this review aims to shed light on this with real-world evidence from clinical research performed at our Unit, the University Center of Excellence on Nephrologic, Rheumatologic and Rare Diseases with Nephrology and Dialysis Unit and Center of Immuno-Rheumatology and Rare Diseases (CMID) (Turin, Italy). In order to determine the key clinical and prognostic features, and therapeutic approaches for severe and/or refractory SLE, our experience will be described together with existing literature, primarily focused on dermatological, neuropsychiatric, and renal symptoms.

Semi-selective plasma filtration applied to the treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura following bnt162b2 administration.

Following the widespread use of anti SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, there have been reports of thrombocytopenia developing after the administration of different types of vaccine. We report a case of a 63-year-old male who developed neurological symptoms after receiving the second dose of the bnt162b2 vaccine. Blood tests performed upon admission to the Emergency Department revealed severe thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. ADAMTS13 activity was undetectable and antibody titer was high. Due to the rapid neurological deterioration, steroid therapy with prednisone was started at an initial dose of 1 mg/kg/day. Rituximab therapy was started to prevent the formation of new antibodies. Given the slow response to this therapy, we added Caplacizumab, (a monoclonal antibody anti-Von Willebrand factor) in order to inhibit platelet hyperaggregation, combined with standard plasma exchange. The patient experienced repeated episodes of intolerance to fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Switching from plasma exchange to plasma filtration, remission was attained in this unusual case of vaccine-related thrombocytopenia with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia.

Open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial of belimumab therapy for refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome: study protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of belimumab given for 24 months in patients persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) with clinical features attributable to aPL [refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)]. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, single-centre, open-label, prospective, phase II descriptive pilot trial, belimumab will be administered in 15 patients attending San Giovanni Bosco Hospital (Turin) showing refractory and/or non-criteria manifestations of APS. Subjects will receive belimumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (in addition to their ongoing APS treatment) with regimen at 0, 2, 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter (up to week 104). Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. RESULTS: Study endpoints determined at 4, 16, 24, 36, 52 and 104 weeks will include: primary (safety and adverse events) and secondary outcomes, such as changes in clinical outcomes (recurrent thromboses, thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anaemia, cardiovascular events, skin ulcer, aPL-related nephropathy and cognitive dysfunction), laboratory outcomes (routine tests, aPL, ENA and anti-dsDNA tests, thrombin generation assay, interferon-signature analysis, lymphocytes immunophenotyping, BLyS determination) and QoL evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting B-cells is emerging as an appealing strategy for patients with APS. Preliminary observations showed aPL negativisation after starting therapy with belimumab. The clinical relevance of these findings will be investigated in this prospective study. If confirmed, the current 'anti-thrombotic' approach to APS patients could be complemented, at least in selected cases, with an 'immunomodulatory' strategy.

Renal Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis.

Fibrosis can be defined as a pathological process in which deposition of connective tissue replaces normal parenchyma. The kidney, like any organ or tissue, can be impacted by this maladaptive reaction, resulting in persistent inflammation or long-lasting injury. While glomerular injury has traditionally been regarded as the primary focus for classification and prognosis of lupus nephritis (LN), increasing attention has been placed on interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy as markers of injury severity, predictors of therapeutic response, and prognostic factors of renal outcome in recent years. This review will discuss the fibrogenesis in LN and known mechanisms of renal fibrosis. The importance of the chronicity index, which was recently added to the histological categorization of LN, and its role in predicting treatment response and renal prognosis for patients with LN, will be explored. A better understanding of cellular and molecular pathways involved in fibrosis in LN could enable the identification of individuals at higher risk of progression to chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease, and the development of new therapeutic strategies for lupus patients.