Organochlorine pesticides and chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents in the blood of chemically sensitive patients [corrected]. A statistical comparison with therapeutic medication and natural hormones.

The blood levels of organochlorine pesticides and chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents were measured in 200 and 114 chemically sensitive patients respectively, and compared with blood concentrations of standard medication (non- chlorinated substances. Clonidine, Haloperidol) of comparable toxicity after therapeutically effective dosage, and with reference levels of highly potent chemicals in the blood such as hormones. It was shown that the average blood levels of the most toxic environmental pollutants are comparable with the therapeutic steady state average blood levels of medications which have similar toxicities in the animal model. In addition the toxicity levels of xenoestrogens are at least an order of magnitude higher than normal plasma estrogen or progesterone levels. These findings suggest the possibility of additive or synergistic effects of these chlorinated compounds and the aforementioned medications. Also, these findings suggest the possibility of hormone deregulation from exposure to the aforementioned toxic chlorinated compounds.

Confirmation of chemical sensitivity by means of double-blind inhalant challenge of toxic volatile chemicals.

Fifty chemically sensitive patients with vascular, asthmatic and arthritic signs, ranging in age from 21 to 61, were exposed to double-blind challenges of ambient doses of inhaled toxic chemicals in a specially designed booth in an Environmental Control Unit (ECU). Primary signs and symptoms were recorded before and after challenge with five chemicals and three placebos. Inhaled challenges included phenol (less than .0025 ppm), petroleum-derived ethyl alcohol (less than .5 ppm), formaldehyde (less than .2 ppm), chlorine (less than .3 ppm), and pesticide (2, 3,-D at less than .0034 ppm). Placebos were water or saline. A set on testing criteria were evaluated for maximizing the likelihood of well-defined, reproducible information from these ambient-dose double-blind challenges. For best results, these testing criteria include: Before testing, the patient must be housed in a chemically less polluted environment. The individual must have been de-adapted to food, air, and water pollutants by means of a water fat for three to four days. At the time of the challenge, the patient must be on food and water previously determined to be safe. An enclosed non-pulluted challenge booth must be used for these chemical exposures. Sign and symptom scores appropriate for that patient must be recorded, before and after challenge. Appropriate doses of the chemical in question (determined by air concentration and length of exposure) are necessary to investigate a particular problem. The conclusion of the study is that in these patients, chemical sensitivity clearly does exist (pulse rate differences between positive responses and placebo - p .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Air pollution analysis used in operating an environmental control unit.

A simple, fast and reliable method was developed to measure the origin and daily and seasonal variations of selected air pollutants in the Brookhaven Environmental Unit. None of the pollutants that were measured surpassed its threshold limit value. The average concentrations of the pollutants that were measured could be considered as preliminary standard for environmental units in hospitals as long as material analysis for outgassing is used simultaneously.