Plateau Iris - Therapeutic options and functional results after treatment.

We present the therapeutic options and functional results in patients with plateau iris (syndrome or configuration) in consecutive case series. Material and method: Our study included newly diagnosed patients with acute angle closure by "plateau iris" (configuration or syndrome), between June 2016 and April 2017. Series of 8 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria, all being females. All the patients underwent an individualized treatment according to the underlying mechanism and evolution. Functional results (visual acuity, IOP, topical medication) were reported in the current paper. Results: For 10 months, we diagnosed 14 eyes, from 9 patients with acute angle closure by Plateau Iris, distributed as it follows: 6 eyes with closed angle glaucoma (optic disk and visual field changes), 8 eyes with plateau iris syndrome and 2 eyes with plateau iris configuration. 7/ 8 patients were misdiagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma, whereas only one patient had the correct diagnosis of closed angle glaucoma and underwent peripheral laser iridotomy. As treatment options in our study, we recommended and performed argon laser peripheral iridoplasty + iridotomy in 10/ 14 eyes, cataract lens was extracted in 4 eyes and then replaced with PC-IOL, whereas 2 eyes required a filtering anti-glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy + PI). 2 eyes from the same patient could not be treated as intended as the patient refused the treatment. In this unique case, Pilocarpine (4%) was temporarily indicated. Conclusion: Plateau iris represents a diagnostic trap, but based on a thorough gonioscopic examination and a good patient history, the right diagnosis can be made, all along with a correct therapeutic approach.

Non-parametric tests in detecting glaucoma progression.

Automated perimetry still represents the gold standard in long term glaucoma monitoring. On a daily practice basis, glaucoma progression analysis could be difficult due to the long time needed to detect, confirm, and quantify the progression rate. Moreover, "trend" and "event" analysis require a good theoretical basis to perform and interpret. Aim of study was to present an alternative method to conventional Glaucoma Progression Analysis (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, Carl Zeiss® Inc.) applied for the early detection of glaucoma progression. Such an "event" analysis orients the clinician in a fast manner on the progression profile in glaucoma patients and might adapt the follow up visits accordingly. Method and material: 41 eyes from 41 patients with open angle glaucoma were studied in a longitudinal manner, over a 24 months' time interval from diagnosis. Results: in the GPA analysis, a positive "event" (progression) was detected in 11/ 41 eyes (26.82%). Non-parametric analysis confirmed progression in all GPA cases, and additionally found 8 more eyes with positive progression (46.34% studied eyes). Mc Nemar concordance analysis between tests was good and relevant (kappa index k=0.596, p=0.000), with positive correlation (r=0.652, p=0.008). In conclusion, NPA tends to overestimate the number of progression cases in a cohort, but it can easily orient the clinician on the profile of the followed patients. In the first years, the GPA analysis can be highly inaccurate, but there is a great need to detect which patients are at significant risk for vision loss (fast progressors). Yet, combining the two methods of detection of glaucoma progression, the practitioners might direct their selected interest and attention towards observing a larger than expected number of patients who are at risk for vision loss over time due to glaucoma, but not necessarily in a fast manner.