Lack of efficacy of a starch-thickened preterm formula on gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is common in preterm infants; conservative interventions (i.e. dietary changes) should represent the first-line approach. AIM: To evaluate by combined pH and impedance monitoring (pH-MII) the effect of a new preterm formula thickened with amylopectin (TPF) on GOR features in symptomatic preterm infants. METHODS: Twenty-eight symptomatic preterm newborns underwent a 24-hour pH-MII; each baby received eight meals (four of TPF and four of a preterm formula [PF]). GOR indexes (number, acidity, duration and height of GORs) after TPF and PF meals were compared by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Viscosity of PF and TPF was measured. RESULTS: TPF significantly decreased the number of acid GORs detected by pH-monitoring (TPF vs. PF: median 20 vs. 24.5, p = 0.009), while it had no influence on Reflux Index (RIpH), nor on acid and non-acid GOR indexes detected by MII, GOR physical features, and GOR height. TPF's viscosity was extremely higher than PF's, and further increased at pH 3 after the addition of pepsin. CONCLUSIONS: The new formula was found to reduce the number of acid GORs detected by pH-monitoring; it did not reduce neither total oesophageal acid exposure nor non-acid GORs. At present its extended clinical use cannot be recommended.

The effect of body positioning on gastroesophageal reflux in premature infants: evaluation by combined impedance and pH monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pattern of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in different body positions in preterm infants with reflux symptoms by a combined multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH monitoring, which identifies both acid and nonacid GER. STUDY DESIGN: Premature infants with frequent regurgitation and postprandial desaturation (n = 22) underwent a 24-hour recording of MII-pH. In a within-subjects design, reflux indexes were analyzed with the infants in 4 different positions: supine (S), prone (P), on the right side (RS), and on the left side (LS). RESULTS: All infants were analyzed for 20 hours. The mean number of recorded GER episodes was 109.7. The mean esophageal exposure to acid and nonacid GER was lower in positions P (4.4% and 0.3%, respectively) and LS (7.5% and 0.7%, respectively) than in positions RS (21.4% and 1.2%, respectively) and S (17.6% and 1.3%, respectively). The number of postprandial nonacid GER episodes decreased but the number of acid GER episodes increased over time. The LS position showed the lowest esophageal acid exposure (0.8%) in the early postprandial period, and the P position showed the lowest esophageal acid exposure (5.1%) in the late postprandial period. CONCLUSION: Placing premature infants in the prone or left lateral position in the postprandial period is a simple intervention to limit GER.

Starch thickening of human milk is ineffective in reducing the gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants: a crossover study using intraluminal impedance.

We evaluated the efficacy of the thickening of human milk by precooked starch in reducing gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants. Five preterm infants with frequent regurgitations (median gestational age, 28 weeks; range, 27 to 32 weeks; median birth weight, 990 g; range, 570 to 1900 g) were fed alternately during 24 hours with four meals of fortified maternal milk (milk A) and four meals of fortified maternal milk thickened by 1.5 g of precooked starch per 100 mL of milk (milk B). The acidic and buffered refluxes were detected by simultaneous pH monitoring and multiple intraluminal impedance. Eight feeding periods for each baby were recorded. The number of the acidic (34 after milk A vs 36 after milk B) and buffered (112 after milk A vs 134 after milk B) episodes of gastroesophageal reflux did not differ. Thickening human milk by precooked starch is ineffective in reducing gastroesophageal reflux in premature infants.