Perfusion computed tomography-guided intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke beyond 4.5 hours: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Extending the therapeutic window of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke beyond the established 4.5-hour limit is of critical importance in order to increase the proportion of thrombolysed stroke patients. In this setting, the capacity of MRI to select acute stroke patients for reperfusion therapies in delayed time windows has been and is being tested in clinical trials. However, whether the more available and cost-effective perfusion computed tomography (PCT) may be useful to select candidates for delayed intravenous thrombolysis remains largely unexplored. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PCT-guided intravenous thrombolysis beyond 4.5 h after stroke onset. METHODS: We prospectively studied all consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in our stroke unit between January 2008 and December 2010. Patients treated within 0- 4.5 h were treated according to non-contrast CT (NCCT) criteria. Beyond 4.5 h, patients received intravenous tPA according to PCT criteria, i.e. an infarct core on cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps not exceeding one third of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory and tissue at risk as defined by mean transit time-CBV mismatch greater than 20%. Predetermined primary endpoints were symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation and favorable long-term outcome, while early neurological improvement and MCA recanalization were considered secondary endpoints. Statistical analysis included bivariate comparisons between the two groups for each endpoint and logistic regression models when significance was found in bivariate analyses. This study was approved by our local ethics committee. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients received intravenous thrombolysis. After the groups were matched by baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 172 patients treated at <4.5 h and 43 patients treated at >4.5 h were finally included. Early and late groups were comparable regarding baseline variables; only cardioembolic etiology was more frequent in the >4.5 h group. Rates of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (2.9% in the <4.5 h group vs. 2.3% in the >4.5 h group; p = 1.0) and good long-term outcome (64.5 vs. 60.5%, respectively; p = 0.620) were similar between the groups. However, delayed intravenous thrombolysis was independently associated with a worse early clinical course [odds ratio (OR) 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-4.1; p = 0.038] and lower 2-hour MCA recanalization rates (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.17-0.92; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Primary safety and efficacy endpoints were comparable between the early and delayed thrombolysis groups. The results of our exploratory study may justify a randomized clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of PCT-guided intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting beyond 4.5 h from symptom onset.

Latent tuberculosis seems not to reactivate in multiple sclerosis patients on natalizumab.

Current safety recommendations for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who are considered for natalizumab do not specify how to screen for latent tuberculosis (LTB). Only chest X-ray is recommended as a routine, and follow-up depends on its results. The incidence of TB in Spain is high and the risk of a LTB reactivation due to natalizumab is unknown. Our objective is to describe in our clinical practice if following the current recommendations for the MS population on natalizumab allows identifying patients with a LTB, as well as the risk for TB reactivation. Our study demonstrated that, in our environment, current recommendations are not sensitive enough to identify cases of LTB, though no cases of active TB were observed. Considering the lack of documented active TB cases worldwide among natalizumab patients, we suggest that these safety measures are probably unnecessary, even in countries with a high TB incidence.