Towards the automated detection of interictal epileptiform discharges with magnetoencephalography.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients with epilepsy traditionally relies on visual identification of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), which is time consuming and dependent on subjective criteria. NEW METHOD: Here, we explore the ability of Independent Components Analysis (ICA) and Hidden Markov Modeling (HMM) to automatically detect and localize IEDs. We tested our pipelines on resting-state MEG recordings from 10 school-aged children with (multi)focal epilepsy. RESULTS: In focal epilepsy patients, both pipelines successfully detected visually identified IEDs, but also revealed unidentified low-amplitude IEDs. Success was more mitigated in patients with multifocal epilepsy, as our automated pipeline missed IED activity associated with some foci-an issue that could be alleviated by post-hoc manual selection of epileptiform ICs or HMM states. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: We compared our results with visual IED detection by an experienced clinical magnetoencephalographer, getting heightened sensitivity and requiring minimal input from clinical practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: IED detection based on ICA or HMM represents an efficient way to identify IED localization and timing. The development of these automatic IED detection algorithms provide a step forward in clinical MEG practice by decreasing the duration of MEG analysis and enhancing its sensitivity.

A Multimodal Approach for Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze pain intensity in patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) following a multimodal rehabilitation protocol. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out following the Template for Intervention Description and Replication criteria. Patients were recruited from the rehabilitation unit of a university hospital in Spain between 2009 and 2013. Patients were included if they had a medical diagnosis of MPS in any of the following regions: cervicobrachial (n = 102), lumbosacral (n = 30), elbow (n = 14), ankle and foot (n = 10), and temporomandibular jaw (n = 1). The multimodal rehabilitation protocol included myofascial trigger point dry needling, spray and stretching, Kinesio taping, eccentric exercise, and patient education. The protocol was applied for 4 weeks (5 sessions) for the active and/or latent myofascial trigger points in each body region. Pain intensity was measured by using the visual analog scale (VAS) immediately before beginning of the study and 1 week after completion of the protocol. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 150 patients (mean ± standard deviation age, 51.5 ± 1.19 years). Statistically significant differences were obtained for reduction in pain intensity (4 ± 2.03; P = .002). Clinically relevant reductions (VAS ≥30 mm; P < .001) were obtained in 78.7% of the interventions. Four treatment sessions reduced the VAS score by 10 mm in 83.55% of the sample. There were no statistically significant differences (P = .064) for reduction in pain intensity in the different body regions. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal rehabilitation protocol showed clinically relevant differences in the reduction in pain intensity in different body regions in patients with MPS.