Peripheral nerve regeneration in rats using nerve graft in a vein conduit pre-filled with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF).

Treatment of peripheral nerve injury is not always satisfactory. To improve results, specific adjuvant methods have been used, such as platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and vein conduits. The goal of this study was to assess whether use of PRF and vein conduits after nerve suture improves nerve regeneration as measured by a functional score and histomorphometry analysis. Ten isogenic spontaneously hypertensive rats were randomly assigned to 4 experimental procedures: 1) Sham group (n = 10); 2) Nerve graft (NG) group (n = 10); 3) Nerve graft covered with a vein conduit (NGVC) (n = 10); and 4) Nerve graft covered with a vein conduit pre-filled with PRF (NGVCP) (n = 10). Nerve repair results were evaluated on: sciatic functional index (SFI) at 0, 30, 60 and 90 days; morphometric and morphologic analysis of the distal nerve; and histological analysis of Fluoro-Gold® stained motor neurons in the anterior horn of the spinal cord. Compared to the Sham control group, the NGVC and NGVCP groups exhibited lower SFI on all measures. The NGVC group showed improvement in SFI at day 90, which was significant compared to the NG group. Fiber and axon diameters were comparable in the NGVC and NGVCP groups, which were both significantly lower than in the Sham and NG groups. Significant improvement was expected with PRF, but in fact the release of factors from this substance was not as effective as hoped.

Outcome of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with and without Linburg-Comstock anomaly.

Anatomical variations may entail increased volume within the carpal tunnel and consequently the development of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms. The clinical importance of anomalous connection between the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons was described by Linburg and Comstock. The objective of the present study was to compare postoperative outcomes of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with and without Linburg-Comstock anomaly (LCA). Hands of CTS patients with and without LCA were evaluated for finger sensitivity, grip, tip, key and tripod pinch strength, pain intensity and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Forty-six hands in 36 CTS patients with LCA and 50 hands in 38 patients without LCA were included. On all study parameters, no significant difference was found between CTS patients with versus without LCA. As outcomes are similar in both cases, LCA resection is not useful in patients with LCA and CTS. Preoperative diagnosis is unnecessary and screening for LCA is non-contributive for CTS evaluation.

Linburg-Comstock anomaly: A comparison of the prevalence in women with and without clinical carpal tunnel syndrome.

We aimed to compare the prevalence of the Linburg-Comstock anomaly in women with and without a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. The prevalence of the Linburg-Comstock anomaly was evaluated in 400 hands from 200 women over 40 years of age who were diagnosed clinically with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), designated as the CTS group. The volunteer group consisted of 400 hands from 200 healthy women over 40 years of age. The women from both groups were asked to carry out the clinical flexion and pain tests described by Linburg and Comstock (1979) as a basis for the clinical diagnosis. CTS patient ages ranged from 40 to 90 (mean 55.8) years, while volunteer group ages ranged from 40 to 93 (mean 55) years. The flexion test was positive in 305 (76%) hands in the CTS group and 242 (60%) hands in the volunteer group. The pain test was positive in 261 (65%) hands in the CTS group and 108 (27%) hands in the volunteer group. Both tests were positive in 244 (61%) hands in the CTS group and 98 (24%) hands in the volunteer group. All these differences were statistically significant. Based on clinical examination using the flexion and pain tests, the prevalence of Linburg-Comstock anomaly was statistically higher in the group of women with carpal tunnel syndrome than in healthy volunteers.

The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: Translation for portuguese language, cultural adaptation, and validation.

Evaluating scars is fundamental to analyse the outcome of treatments that include surgical intervention. Scales facilitate this type of assessment, but most of these measuring instruments are in different languages. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is one of the most robust instruments available in the literature for the evaluation of scars, although there is no validated version in Brazilian Portuguese. The aims of this study were to culturally translate and validate POSAS for the Portuguese language of Brazil and to test its reproducibility, face validity, content, and construct. Following the methodology proposed by Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz, MB, Spine 2000, 25, 3186, the questionnaire was translated and adapted to the Brazilian culture. The reproducibility, face, content, and construct validity were then analysed. In all, the scale was applied to 35 patients with postoperative scars (patient version) and 35 hand surgery specialists (version for the observer). The internal consistency was tested by Cronbach's alpha, and construct validation was performed by correlating the translated instrument with the Brazilian Portuguese translation of the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). The cultural adaptation of POSAS Escola Paulista de Medicina/Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/UNIFESP) was confirmed. Both subscales showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.77-0.93), demonstrating reliability. The reproducibility was excellent, and the adapted scale demonstrated significant intra- and inter-observer reproducibility (r > 0.9) (P < 0.05). The validity of the construct was significant and showed good sensitivity between POSAS EMP/UNIFESP and the VSS. This study confirmed that POSAS EPM/UNIFESP can be used to evaluate patients with surgical scars in the Brazilian population. It has proven to be useful for clinical and research purposes, lending itself to capturing medical opinions and those of the patients themselves.

[Therapeutic use of nitric oxide: implications for nursing]. / Utilização do óxido nítrico como terapêutica: implicações para a enfermagem.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a gas that transmits signals in the organism. Such signal transmission takes place by means of the gas synthesis and release in different cell types. After it is released, the gas penetrates the membrane of a neighboring cell and regulates its function. Such mechanism represents an entirely new signaling principle in biological systems. The discoverers of NO as a signaling molecule were awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology in 1998. This discovery has revolutionized medicine and originated new treatments for old problems. In this study, we review the role of NO in some pathologies such as sepsis, arterial hypertension and pulmonary hypertension and Nitric Oxide is explained in terms of its current merit for treatment and its impact on nursing care.