Cariprazine in the acute treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cariprazine has emerged as a promising augmenting treatment agent for unipolar depression and as a monotherapy option for bipolar depression. We evaluated cariprazine's efficacy in treating acute major depressive episodes in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and ScanMedicine. Study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Pairwise and dose-response meta-analyses were conducted with RStudio. Evidence quality was assessed with GRADE. RESULTS: Nine RCTs meeting inclusion criteria encompassed 4889 participants. Cariprazine, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the MADRS score (MD = -1.49, 95 % CI: -2.22 to -0.76) and demonstrated significantly higher response (RR = 1.21, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 1.30) and remission (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.06 to 1.34) rates. Subgroup analysis unveiled statistically significant reductions in MADRS score in MDD (MD = -1.15, 95 % CI: -2.04 to -0.26) and bipolar I disorder (BDI) (MD = -2.53, 95 % CI: -3.61 to -1.45), higher response rates for both MDD (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.08 to 1.31) and BDI (RR = 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.10 to 1.46), and higher remission rates only for BDI (RR = 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.24 to 1.60). A higher rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was observed. LIMITATIONS: Reliance solely on RCTs limits generalisability; strict criteria might not reflect real-world diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Cariprazine demonstrates efficacy in treating major depressive episodes, although variations exist between MDD and BDI and tolerability may be an issue.

Prevalence of the Most Frequent Neuropsychiatric Diagnoses in Hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 Patients Evaluated by Liaison Psychiatry: Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with the acute onset of mental and behavioural symptoms and psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of the different neuropsychiatric diagnoses in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection assessed by Liaison Psychiatry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in a hospital near Lisbon, Portugal. We reviewed the electronic health records from all inpatients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test that were assessed by the Liaison Psychiatry Unit (LPU) between February and December 2020. We reviewed relevant sociodemographic and clinical data, including 15 neuropsychiatric symptoms. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was our main outcome. We also explored differences between two groups: patients with delirium (delirium group) and patients without delirium (no delirium group). RESULTS: We included 46 cases [Age: median = 67 years; interquartile range (IQR) = 24)], with 60.9% male individuals. Delirium was the most frequent diagnosis in our sample (43.5%), followed by major depressive disorder (21.7%). Patients with delirium were more likely to suffer from COVID-19 symptoms (delirium: 19/20, 95%; no delirium: 14/26, 53.8%; p = 0.02), and to have a longer time interval between a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test and an evaluation by the LPU (delirium: median = 16.5 days, IQR = 16; no delirium: median = 8 days, IQR = 16.3; p = 0.045). Agitation (52.2%) and cognitive symptoms (47.8%) were the most reported neuropsychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of delirium in our sample. This finding is in line with recent literature concerning hospitalized COVID-19 patients The higher frequency of COVID-19 symptoms found in the delirium group suggests a possible association between symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and delirium onset.

Introdução: A infecção por SARS-CoV-2 tem sido associada ao desenvolvimento agudo de sintomas mentais e comportamentais e perturbações psiquiátricas. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a prevalência de diferentes diagnósticos neuropsiquiátricos em doentes hospitalizados com infeção SARS-CoV-2 avaliados pela Psiquiatria de Ligação. Material e Métodos: Realizámos um estudo transversal num hospital da região de Lisboa, em Portugal. Revimos os processos clínicos dos pacientes internados com um resultado RT-PCR positivo para SARS-CoV-2 avaliados pela Unidade de Psiquiatria de Ligação (UPL) entre fevereiro e dezembro de 2020. Incluímos dados sociodemográficos e clínicos, incluindo quinze sintomas neuropsiquiátricos. A incidência de diferentes diagnósticos psiquiátricos foi o nosso outcome primário. Explorámos também diferenças entre dois grupos: doentes com delirium e doentes sem delirium. Resultados: Incluímos 46 casos [Idade: mediana = 67 anos; amplitude interquartil (AIQ) = 24)], a maioria do sexo masculino (60,9%). Delirium foi o diagnóstico mais frequente na nossa amostra (43,5%), seguido de perturbação depressiva major (21,7%). Doentes com delirium tiveram uma prevalência maior de sintomas de COVID-19 (delirium: 19/20, 95%; sem delirium: 14/26, 53,8%; p = 0,02), bem como um intervalo de tempo mais longo entre um teste RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positivo e observação pela UPL (delirium: mediana = 16,5, AIQ = 16; sem delirium: mediana = 8, AIQ = 16,3; p = 0,045). Agitação (52,2%) e sintomas cognitivos (47,8%) foram os sintomas neuropsiquiátricos mais relatados. Conclusão: Foi encontrada na nossa amostra uma elevada prevalência de delirium. Este resultado está de acordo com literatura recente relativamente a doentes internados com COVID-19. A maior frequência de sintomas COVID-19 no grupo com delirium sugere uma possível associação entre infecção sintomática por SARS-CoV-2 e o desenvolvimento desta síndrome.

Sex Differences in Functional Connectivity Between Resting State Brain Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Functional brain connectivity (FBC) has previously been examined in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) between-resting-state networks (RSNs) using a highly sensitive and reproducible hypothesis-free approach. However, results have been inconsistent and sex differences have only recently been taken into consideration using this approach. We estimated main effects of diagnosis and sex and a diagnosis by sex interaction on between-RSNs FBC in 83 ASD (40 females/43 males) and 85 typically developing controls (TC; 43 females/42 males). We found increased connectivity between the default mode (DM) and (a) the executive control networks in ASD (vs. TC); (b) the cerebellum networks in males (vs. females); and (c) female-specific altered connectivity involving visual, language and basal ganglia (BG) networks in ASD-in suggestive compatibility with ASD cognitive and neuroscientific theories.