Investigation of related factors of operating room nurses' attitudes and awareness towards surgery-related pressure injury prevention in Turkey, Croatia, and Italy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine related factors of operating room nurses' attitudes and awareness towards surgery-related pressure injury prevention in Turkey, Croatia, and Italy. METHODS: A descriptive and cross-sectional design was used. The study was conducted between March and September 2023. Data were collected with an online questionnaire created on Google Forms, consisting of a Nurse Information Form, a Surgery-related Pressure Injury Awareness Form, and the Attitude towards Pressure Ulcer Prevention Instrument. RESULTS: The sample of the study consisted of 258 operating room nurses working in Turkey, Croatia, and Italy. It was found that the majority of the participants (70.90 %) did not use a risk scale, had not received education on pressure injury prevention and treatment (58.10 %) but wanted to receive it (86 %). Mean attitude scores of operating room nurses by country were at an adequate level in Turkey (42.48 ± 4.30) but not at the desired level in Croatia (37.48 ± 3.44) and Italy (36.20 ± 4.02). While there was a significant positive relationship between the awareness and attitudes of operating room nurses in Turkey (p = 0.002) and Croatia (p < 0.001), no relationship was found between these variables of nurses in Italy (p = 0.109). A statistically significant difference was found between nurses' consideration of themselves sufficient and their attitudes and awareness in all three countries (p < 0.05). It was also determined that reading articles affected nurses' awareness in all countries. CONCLUSIONS: While operating room nurses' attitudes towards preventing pressure injuries were adequate in Turkey, it was determined that those of the nurses in Croatia and Italy were not at the desired level. Nurses should receive regular training on surgical pressure injuries to increase their awareness and to support them in implementing the recommendations of pressure injury guidelines in accordance with institutional policy.

Telehealth care and remote monitoring strategies in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a cardiac clinical syndrome that involves complex pathological aetiologies. It represents a growing public health issue and affects a significant number of people worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize evidence related to the impact of telemonitoring strategies on mortality and hospital readmissions of heart failure patients. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Engineering Source, and INSPEC. To be included, studies had to be in English or Italian and involve heart failure patients of any NYHA class, receiving care through any telecare, remote monitoring, telemonitoring, or telehealth programmes. Articles had to contain data on both mortality and number of patients who underwent rehospitalizations during follow-ups. To explore the effectiveness of telemonitoring strategies in reducing both one-year all-cause mortality and one-year rehospitalizations, studies were synthesized through meta-analyses, while those excluded from meta-analyses were summarized narratively. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies were included in the review. Narrative synthesis of data suggests a trend towards a reduction in deaths among monitored patients, but the number of rehospitalized patients was higher in this group. Meta-analysis of studies reporting one-year all-cause mortality outlined the protective power of care models based on telemonitoring in reducing one-year all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis of studies reporting the number of rehospitalized patients in one-year outlined that telemonitoring is effective in reducing the number of rehospitalized patients when compared with usual care strategies. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review confirms the benefits of telemonitoring in reducing mortality and rehospitalizations of HF patients. Further research is needed to reduce the heterogeneity of the studies.

Nursing Diagnosis Accuracy in Nursing Education: Clinical Decision Support System Compared With Paper-Based Documentation-A Before and After Study.

Computer-based technologies have been widely used in nursing education, although the best educational modality to improve documentation and nursing diagnostic accuracy using electronic health records is still under investigation. It is important to address this gap and seek an effective way to address increased accuracy around nursing diagnoses identification. Nursing diagnoses are judgments that represent a synthesis of data collected by the nurse and used to guide interventions and to achieve desirable patients' outcomes. This current investigation is aimed at comparing the nursing diagnostic accuracy, satisfaction, and usability of a computerized system versus a traditional paper-based approach. A total of 66 nursing students solved three validated clinical scenarios using the NANDA-International terminologies traditional paper-based approach and then the computer-based Clinical Decision Support System. Study findings indicated a significantly higher nursing diagnostic accuracy ( P < .001) in solving cancer and stroke clinical scenarios, whereas there was no significant difference in acute myocardial infarction scenario. The use of the electronic system increased the number of correct diagnostic indicators ( P < .05); however, the level of students' satisfaction was similar. The usability scores highlighted the need to make the electronic documentation systems more user-friendly.

The Implementation of the WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist by Italian Operating Teams: A Descriptive Study.

AIM: The study aimed at reporting the extent to which nurses in operating teams comply with the WHO's surgical safety checklist at the national level. METHOD: A total of 621 nurses who attended the conferences held by the Association of Italian Nurses in Operating Teams (AICO) in 2019 were selected as the sample group for this descriptive study. They filled a paper-based questionnaire of items, which were according to WHO's recommendations for surgical safety. Descriptive analyses were used to illustrate participants' characteristics and responses to the questionnaire. The chi-square test was used to outline the relation between participants' socio-cultural features and the information on the extent to which participants implemented the surgical safety checklist. RESULTS: According to the data collected, a majority of the participants (95.2%) claimed to comply with the checklist in perioperative procedures. Moreover, most participants (63.2%) revealed that they revise the checklist according to specific circumstances affecting their workflow and/or operational team. Additionally, almost a third of participants (31.9%) stated that they undertake an oral completion of the steps in the checklist to ensure its effective implementation. CONCLUSION: In this study, it emerged that the implementation of measures ensuring safety standards is largely inconsistent with the guidelines provided by WHO. Notably, major discrepancies occur when it comes to team members' coordination, the revision of the checklist according to specific circumstances, the oral completion of the checklist's steps during the workflow, and the active contribution of all team members in the implementation of the surgical safety checklist.

Dose-Response Relationship between High-Fidelity Simulation and Intensive Care Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes: An Italian Multimethod Study.

Background: The best application modality of high-fidelity simulation in graduate critical care nursing courses is still rarely investigated in nursing research. This is an important issue since advanced nursing skills are necessary to effectively respond to critically ill patients' care needs. The aim of the study was to examine the influence of a modified teaching model based on multiple exposures to high-fidelity simulations on both the learning outcomes and the perceptions of graduate students enrolled in a critical care nursing course. Methods: A multimethod study involving a sample of graduate critical care nursing students was conducted. A theoretical teaching model focused on multiple exposures to high-fidelity simulations is currently applied as a teaching method in an Italian critical care nursing course. According to the Kirkpatrick model for evaluating training programs, the performance, self-efficacy, and self-confidence in managing critically ill patients were considered learning outcomes, while satisfaction with learning and students' lived experiences during the experimental phases were considered students' perceptions. Results: Multiple exposures to high-fidelity simulations significantly improved performance, self-efficacy, and self-confidence in managing virtual critically ill patients' care needs. The satisfaction level was high, while lived experiences of participants were positive and allowed for better explanation of quantitative results of this study. Conclusions: Multiple exposures to high-fidelity simulations can be considered a valuable teaching method that can improve the learning outcomes of graduate nurses enrolled in an intensive care course.