RESUMO
No artigo são apresentados dois estudos de caso sobre contaminação por chumbo no Brasil. As situações estudadas referem-se a Santo Amaro da Purificação, nordeste, e Adrianópolis, sul, onde comunidades convivem com a contaminação ambiental e a exposição humana ao chumbo em decorrência das atividades industriais e de mineração desenvolvidas durantes décadas, por uma mesma empresa, de forma inconsistente com os padrões ambientais e de mineração, com pouco controle dos impactos ambientais e à saúde humana advindos. Os principais objetivos da investigação realizada foram analisar as estratégias de comunicação de risco adotadas junto às comunidades locais e avaliar o engajamento delas no processo de gerenciamento do risco. A metodologia aplicada incluiu análise de notícias jornalísticas e entrevistas realizadas com diferentes atores sociais, como moradores, jornalistas, pesquisadores e autoridades. Os resultados indicaram a necessidade de promover o envolvimento público no debate e no processo decisório. Os resultados validaram também a hipótese de que os modelos associativos (representados por associações de moradores, por exemplo) são importantes na promoção e no estímulo da participação pública no gerenciamento do risco.
This investigation focused on lead contamination case studies in Brazil. The situations studied involve communities living in Santo Amaro da Purificação and Adrianópolis, in the north-east and south of Brazil, respectively. These communities have all had to live with environmental contamination and human exposure to lead as a consequence of industrial, mining and processing activities that were conducted by the same company for decades in a manner inconsistent with modern mining and industrial standards, with little control of environmental and human health impacts. The investigation sought to analyze the strategies of risk communication to local people, and to evaluate their engagement in risk management. The methodological approach included the analysis of newspaper articles, and interviews conducted with different stakeholders, such as residents, journalists, researchers and authorities. The results indicated the need to promote public involvement in the debate and in the decision-making process. The results also confirmed the hypothesis that associative models (represented by local neighborhood associations, for instance) are important for promoting and eliciting public participation in risk management.
Assuntos
Humanos , Comunicação , Exposição Ambiental , Poluentes Ambientais/efeitos adversos , Poluição Ambiental , Chumbo/efeitos adversos , Gestão de Riscos , BrasilRESUMO
This investigation focused on lead contamination case studies in Brazil. The situations studied involve communities living in Santo Amaro da Purificação and Adrianópolis, in the north-east and south of Brazil, respectively. These communities have all had to live with environmental contamination and human exposure to lead as a consequence of industrial, mining and processing activities that were conducted by the same company for decades in a manner inconsistent with modern mining and industrial standards, with little control of environmental and human health impacts. The investigation sought to analyze the strategies of risk communication to local people, and to evaluate their engagement in risk management. The methodological approach included the analysis of newspaper articles, and interviews conducted with different stakeholders, such as residents, journalists, researchers and authorities. The results indicated the need to promote public involvement in the debate and in the decision-making process. The results also confirmed the hypothesis that associative models (represented by local neighborhood associations, for instance) are important for promoting and eliciting public participation in risk management.