Remote contextual fear retrieval engages activity from salience network regions in rats.

The ability to retrieve contextual fear memories depends on the coordinated activation of a brain-wide circuitry. Transition from recent to remote memories seems to involve the reorganization of this circuitry, a process called systems consolidation that has been associated with time-dependent fear generalization. However, it is unknown whether emotional memories acquired under different stress levels can undergo different systems consolidation processes. Here, we explored the activation pattern and functional connectivity of key brain regions associated with contextual fear conditioning (CFC) retrieval after recent (2 days) or remote (28 days) memory tests performed in rats submitted to strong (1.0 mA footshock) or mild (0.3 mA footshock) training. We used brain tissue from Wistar rats from a previous study, where we observed that increasing training intensity promotes fear memory generalization over time, possibly due to an increase in corticosterone (CORT) levels during memory consolidation. Analysis of Fos expression across 8 regions of interest (ROIs) allowed us to identify coactivation between them at both timepoints following memory recall. Our results showed that strong CFC elicits higher Fos activation in the anterior insular and prelimbic cortices during remote retrieval, which was positively correlated with freezing along with the basolateral amygdala. Rats trained either with mild or strong CFC showed broad functional connectivity at the recent timepoint whereas only animals submitted to the strong CFC showed a widespread loss of coactivation during remote retrieval. Post-training plasma CORT levels are positively correlated with FOS expression during recent retrieval in strong CFC, but negatively correlated with FOS expression during remote retrieval in mild CFC. Our findings suggest that increasing training intensity results in differential processes of systems consolidation, possibly associated with increased post-training CORT release, and that strong CFC engages activity from the aIC, BLA and PrL - areas associated with the Salience Network in rats - during remote retrieval.

Corticosterone differentially modulates time-dependent fear generalization following mild or moderate fear conditioning training in rats.

Stressful and emotionally arousing experiences create strong memories that seem to lose specificity over time. It is uncertain, however, how the stress system contributes to the phenomenon of time-dependent fear generalization. Here, we investigated whether post-training corticosterone (CORT-HBC) injections, given after different training intensities, affect contextual fear memory specificity at several time points. We trained male Wistar rats on the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) task using two footshock intensities (mild CFC, 3 footshocks of 0.3 mA, or moderate CFC, 3x 0.6 mA) and immediately after the training session we administered CORT-HBC systemically. We first tested the animals in a novel context and then in the training context at different intervals following training (2, 14, 28 or 42 days). By measuring freezing in the novel context and then contrasting freezing times shown in both contexts, we inferred contextual fear generalization for each rat, classifying them into Generalizers or Discriminators. Following mild CFC training, the glucocorticoid injection promoted an accurate contextual memory at the recent time point (2 days), and increase the contextual memory accuracy 28 days after training. In contrast, after the moderate CFC training, CORT-HBC facilitated contextual generalization at 14 days, compared to the control group that maintained contextual discrimination at this timepoint. For this training intensity, however, CORT-HBC did not have any effect on recent memory specificity. These findings indicate that treatment with CORT-HBC immediately after the encoding of mild or moderately arousing experiences may differentially modulate memory consolidation and time-dependent fear generalization.

Muscimol injection into the substantia nigra but not globus pallidus affects prepulse inhibition and startle reflex.

Behavioral arrest is an essential feature of an animal's survival. Acoustic startle reflex (ASR) is an involuntary whole-body contraction of the skeletal musculature to an unexpected auditory stimulus. This strong reaction can be decreased by prepulse inhibition (PPI) phenomenon; which, for example, is important in reducing distraction during the processing of sensory input. Several brainstem regions are involved in the PPI and startle reflex, but a previous study from our laboratory showed that the main input structure of Basal Ganglia (BG) - the striatum - modulates PPI. The pallidum and nigra are connected with striatum and these brainstem structures. Here, we investigated the role of these striatum outputs in the brain regions on startle amplitude, PPI regulation, and exploratory behavior in Wistar rats. The temporary bilateral inhibition of the globus pallidus (GP) by muscimol lead to motor impairment, without disturbing startle amplitude or PPI. Similarly, inhibition of the entopeduncular nucleus (EPN) specifically disrupted the exploratory behavior. On the other hand, the substantia nigra reticulata (SNr) inhibition interfered in all measured behaviors: decreased the PPI percentage, increased ASR and impaired the locomotor activity. The nigra is a key BG output structure which projects to the thalamus and brainstem. These findings extend our previous study showing that the striatum neurons expressing D1 receptors involvement in PPI occurs via the direct pathway to SNr, but not to the pallidum which more likely occurs by its connection with the caudal pontine nucleus, superior colliculus and/or pedunculopontine nucleus pivotal structures for startle reflex modulation.

Effects of sleep deprivation on different phases of memory in the rat: dissociation between contextual and tone fear conditioning tasks.

Numerous studies show that sleep deprivation (SD) impacts negatively on cognitive processes, including learning and memory. Memory formation encompasses distinct phases of which acquisition, consolidation and retrieval are better known. Previous studies with pre-training SD induced by the platform method have shown impairment in fear conditioning tasks. Nonetheless, pre-training manipulations do not allow the distinction between effects on acquisition and/or consolidation, interfering, ultimately, on recall of/performance in the task. In the present study, animals were first trained in contextual and tone fear conditioning (TFC) tasks and then submitted to SD with the purpose to evaluate the effect of this manipulation on different stages of the learning process, e.g., in the uptake of (new) information during learning, its encoding and stabilization, and the recall of stored memories. Besides, we also investigated the effect of SD in the extinction of fear memory and a possible state-dependent learning induced by this manipulation. For each task (contextual or TFC), animals were trained and then distributed into control, not sleep-deprived (CTL) and SD groups, the latter being submitted to the modified multiple platform paradigm for 96 h. Subsets of eight rats in each group/experiment were submitted to the test of the tasks, either immediately or at different time intervals after SD. The results indicated that (a) pre- but not post-training SD impaired recall in the contextual and TFC; (b) this impairment was not state-dependent; and (c) in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC), pre-test SD prevented extinction of the learned task. Overall, these results suggest that SD interferes with acquisition, recall and extinction, but not necessarily with consolidation of emotional memory.

Inactivation of muscarinic receptors impairs place and response learning: implications for multiple memory systems.

Extensive research has shown that the hippocampus and striatum have dissociable roles in memory and are necessary for place and response learning, respectively. Additional evidence indicates that muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the hippocampus and striatum exert an important role in the modulation of these memory systems. In our experiments, we assessed whether intact hippocampal and striatal muscarinic cholinergic transmission may be essential and/or necessary for place and response learning. We addressed these questions using administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist, scopolamine, on both place and response learning in a food-rewarded T-maze task. The administration of scopolamine (15 µg or 30 µg) directly into the dorsal hippocampus impaired the performance of rats subjected to both place and cue-rich response version of the task, but did not affect the response version, when the task was performed under cue-poor conditions. However, the administration of scopolamine in the dorsolateral striatum impaired the cue-poor response version of the T-maze task without interfering with the place version or cue-rich response version. Taken together, these results indicate that activation of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the hippocampus and striatum facilitate the use of different strategies of learning, thus strengthening the hypothesis of multiple memory systems. Additionally, these results emphasize the importance of the environmental conditions under which tasks are performed.

Hippocampal NMDA receptor blockade impairs CREB phosphorylation in amygdala after contextual fear conditioning.

In contextual fear conditioning (CFC), hippocampus is thought to process environmental stimuli into a configural representation of the context and send it to amygdala nuclei, which current evidences point to be the site of CS-US association and fear memory storage. If it is true, hippocampus should influence learning-induced plasticity in the amygdala nuclei after CFC acquisition. To test this, we infused wistar rats with saline or AP5, a NMDA receptor antagonist, in the dorsal hippocampus just before a CFC session, in which they were conditioned to a single shock, exposed to the context with no shocks or received an immediate shock. The rats were perfused, their brains harvested and immunohistochemically stained for cAMP element binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation ratio (pCREB/CREB) in lateral (LA), basal (B) and central (CeA) amygdala nuclei. CFC showed a learning-specific increase in pCREB ratio in B and CeA, in conditioned-saline rats compared to context and immediate shocked ones. Further, conditioned rats that received AP5 showed a decrease in pCREB ratio in LA, B and CeA. Our results support the current ideas that the role of hippocampus in contextual fear conditioning occurs by sending contextual information to amygdala to serve as conditioned stimulus.

Sleep deprivation alters phosphorylated CREB levels in the amygdala: relationship with performance in a fear conditioning task.

We investigated the relationship between deficits in fear memory induced by sleep deprivation and pCREB expression in the basal and central nuclei of the amygdala. Sleep deprivation reduced pCREB expression in the central nucleus compared to control or sleep recovered groups, and in the basal nucleus only compared to sleep recovered group. Moreover, 24h of sleep recovery prior to training prevented changes in both pCREB expression and performance.

Modafinil prevents inhibitory avoidance memory deficit induced by sleep deprivation in rats.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of modafinil effects on the inhibitory avoidance task (IA). DESIGN: Rats were trained on a multiple trial IA task after receiving modafinil or vehicle injections. In experiment 1 they were trained with a weak protocol under baseline condition and in experiment 2, with a stronger protocol under sleep-deprivation condition. RESULTS: In experiment 1 modafinil improved rats' acquisition whereas the retention test remained unaffected. In Experiment 2 modafinil did not interfere with training performance, but the lower dose prevented the retention impairment in sleep-deprived animals. CONCLUSIONS: Modafinil is able to improve acquisition in normal rats and reverse the long-term memory impairment induced by sleep-deprivation.

Interaction between glutamatergic-NMDA and cholinergic-muscarinic systems in classical fear conditioning.

A number of studies have suggested that the glutamatergic and cholinergic systems are both involved in learning and memory processes and that they interact in order to facilitate these processes. However, the role of M1-muscarinic receptors in mediating this interaction has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine whether the concomitant administration of MK-801 (non-competitive NMDA antagonist) and dicyclomine (M1-muscarinic antagonist--DIC) in sub-effective doses impairs contextual fear conditioning (hippocampal-dependent task) and tone fear conditioning tasks (hippocampal-independent task). The results showed that concomitant pre-training administration of DIC (8.0 mg/kg) and MK-801 (0.07 mg/kg)--two sub-effectives doses for the contextual fear conditioning task--does impair the performance of animals on this task (as measured by freezing behavior time). Tone fear conditioning tasks were not affected by the drugs either administered separately or concurrently. The pre-training administration of sub-effective doses of MK-801 and DIC in combination impairs performance on contextual fear conditioning task (hippocampal-dependent), but not on tone fear conditioning task (hippocampal-independent). These data support the hypothesis that the interaction between glutamatergic and cholinergic systems in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory processes probably occurs through M1 receptor.