RESUMO
Consensus-based recommendations guide standards of care for clinical practice. Pharmaceutical industry involvement in producing such recommendations might undermine their objectivity. We did a systematic review of rheumatology consensus-based recommendations that were published in English from 2000 to 2020. We compared those that were endorsed by major professional societies to those that were sponsored by industry using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Of 234 consensus-based recommendation projects, 51 (22%) were endorsed by major societies and 74 (32%) were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. Among industry-sponsored projects, the sponsor was involved in the consensus-based process in 21 (28%), provided a medical writer in 12 (16%), offered honoraria for participation in five (7%), and was allowed to approve the final draft of one project. When compared with projects endorsed by major societies, industry-sponsored projects were less likely to have a high quality assessment on the AGREE II instrument. These results suggest that industry sponsorship of consensus-based recommendations is common in projects that do not receive endorsement by major societies. Such projects are often of lower quality than guidelines endorsed by major professional societies. Medical journals should consider steps to encourage greater rigour of development and to limit undue influence by industry sponsors.
RESUMO
Background Knee corticosteroid injection (KCSI) and physical therapy (PT) are two efficacious treatments for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, poor adherence to PT in resource-limited communities might limit its effectiveness. KCSI prior to PT might improve adherence in this population. Methodology This was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients referred to PT for KOA from January 01, 2018 to December 31, 2019 from an adult primary care resident clinic in Hartford, Connecticut, USA. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, those who had a KCSI around the time of the referral versus those who did not. PT adherence was evaluated in both groups. Results A total of 143 patients referred to PT were selected, and 11 patients were excluded. In total, 38/132 patients had a KCSI within a four-month window of the PT referral. Patients were mostly Hispanic (no injection 79.8% vs. injection 78.9%) females (80.9% vs. 71.1%), the average age was in the 60s, and over 90% were insured by either Medicaid or Medicare. In the injection group, 18/38 patients completed at least one PT visit (47.4%) versus 21/94 patients (22.3%) in the noninjection group. The odds ratio of undergoing PT was 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-1.69; p = 0.002), and the rate ratio of PT visits was 2.50 (95% CI = 1.82-3.42; p = 1.36 × 10-8), both adjusted for age, sex, and severity. Among those who attended at least one session, the mean number of PT visits was 5.4 in both injection and noninjection groups (median 5 versus 4). Conclusions In a predominantly Hispanic patient population, those who underwent KCSI were more likely to undergo PT and, as a group, attend more sessions.
