RESUMO
Background: Gross Hematuria is a relevant cause of admission to the emergency department in the general population and particularly in older adults (≥80 years). This specific urological symptom is often underestimated and usually associated with benign conditions such as urinary infections or poor hydration. Nevertheless, hematuria could lead to severe acute complications or be the first symptom of urological cancers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1169 patients aged ≥80 years consecutively admitted to the emergency department for hematuria. The primary endpoint of the study was to identify risk factors for major complications, and the secondary endpoint was to analyze risk factors for urological cancer diagnosis. The median age was 85 years (IQR 82-88 years), and 908 (77%) were males. Among them, 449 (38.4%) had a past medical history of urological neoplasm (kidney, ureter, bladder, prostate, or urethral cancer). Results: Overall, 87 patients (7.4%) had major complications (patient death, septic shock, and admission to the intensive care unit). Worse vital signs at admission, fever, and confusion (p < 0.001, OR 18.0 IC 95% [5.5-58.7]; p = 0.015, OR 2.0 IC 95% [1.1-3.5]; p = <0.001, OR 4.2 IC 95% [1.9-3.5], respectively), as well as lower hemoglobin values and higher Charlson comorbidity index (p < 0.001, OR 0.8 IC 95% [0.7-0.9]), p = 0.002, OR = 1.2 [1.1-1.3]) were independent predictive factors for major complications. The multivariate analysis identified as risk factors for diagnosis of urological cancer older age, male sex and higher comorbidity (OR 1.05 IC95% [1-1.09]; OR 2.19 IC95% [1.42-3.39] and OR 1.11 IC95% [1.2-1.2], respectively); interestingly the presence of indwelling vesical catheter (IVC) (OR 0.44 IC95% [0.24-0.82]) resulted as an independent factor for absence of urological cancers. Conclusions: Hematuria is a frequent symptom in older adults admitted to the emergency department. While this is often associated with benign conditions, there are some risk factors for major complications and for urological cancer that must be taken into account to identify the patients who need further evaluation or prompt hospital admission.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) using trifecta and pentafecta parameters. METHODS: The clinical data of 41 patients who underwent RARC between 2018 and 2022 were prospectively collected and retrospectively compared to those of 330 patients undergoing ORC using 1:1 propensity score matching. Trifecta was defined as simultaneous negative surgical margins (SMs), a lymph node (LN) yield ≥ 16, and the absence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III-V) within 90 days postoperatively. Pentafecta additionally included a 12-month recurrence-free rate and a time between the transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TURBT) and radical cystectomy (RC) ≤ 3 months. The continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in trifecta and pentafecta success rates were observed between the RARC and ORC cohorts after propensity score matching. However, the RARC group exhibited significantly reduced blood loss (RARC: 317 mL vs. ORC: 525 mL, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: RARC offers distinct advantages over ORC in terms of reduced blood loss, while trifecta and pentafecta success rates do not differ significantly between the two surgical approaches.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injections in the prostate gland have been used as a minimally invasive option for treating bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). However, the efficacy of transurethral BoNT-A injections for BOO is not well established in the literature. The aim of this study is to collect evidence on the efficacy of transurethral BoNT-A injections for the treatment of BOO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analyses was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. A systematic literature search was performed till December 2022. The study population consisted of adult patients diagnosed with BOO, who underwent transurethral injections of BoNT-A for the treatment of BOO. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Out of 883 records, we identified seven studies enrolling 232 participants, of which only one nonrandomized controlled trial was found. Four prospective studies and two retrospective studies. Three studies included patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies included patients with urethral sphincter hyperactivity. One study included patients with primary bladder neck disease (PBND). All studies showed significant improvements from baseline in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and postvoid residual (PVR) at 3 and 6 months. The adverse events were mild in all studies. Hematuria, UTI, and urinary retention were reported across all studies. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, transurethral BoNT-A injections have been shown to improve LUTS, QoL, and urodynamic parameters of individuals with BOO at 3 and 6 months after injections, and no serious adverse effects have been reported. However, data on the long-term benefits of this treatment are scarce, and more prospective, randomized studies with larger samples examining various injection techniques, dosages, and extended follow-up of recurrent injections are needed.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a significant public health concern, closely linked to antibiotic overuse. During the COVID-19 pandemic, broad-spectrum antibiotics were frequently administered, potentially exacerbating AMR. This study aimed to assess AMR patterns in our urology department before and after the pandemic. METHODS: The study encompassed patients admitted to our urology department from January 2016 to December 2022, with confirmed urinary tract infection, bloodstream infection, or wound infection based on positive culture results. Descriptive statistics, including mean, frequency, and percentage, summarized the data. Trends were analyzed using the Joinpoint Regression program. RESULTS: A total of 506 patients were included. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae displayed resistance rates of 65% and 62% to ciprofloxacin, respectively. K. pneumoniae showed resistance rates of 41% to piperacillin tazobactam and 3rd generation cephalosporins (3GC). Carbapenem resistance was observed in 38% of K. pneumoniae isolates. Additionally, 26% of E. coli, 26% of K. pneumoniae, and 59% of Proteus mirabilis isolates were ESBL-positive. Among gram+, 72% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates were MRSA, and 23% of Enterococcus faecium isolates were VRE. Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns over the 7-year study period revealed a statistically significant decrease in E. coli resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (APC: -5.85; C.I. 95% p < 0.05) and a statistically significant increase in K. pneumoniae resistance to 3GC (APC: 9.93; CI (-19.9-14.4 95% p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in AMR incidence pre- and post-COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic did not appear to influence the AMR incidence in our urology department. However, the overall prevalence of AMR and MDROs in our department remains high compared to European AMR.
