RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To mitigate the post-operative complication rates associated with massive bone allografts, tissue engineering techniques have been employed to decellularize entire bones through perfusion with a sequence of solvents. Mechanical assessment was performed in order to compare conventional massive bone allografts and perfusion/decellularized massive bone allografts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten porcine femurs were included. Five were decellularized by perfusion. The remaining 5 were left untreated as the "control" group. Biomechanical testing was conducted on each bone, encompassing five different assessments: screw pull-out, 3-points bending, torsion, compression and Vickers indentation. RESULTS: Under the experimental conditions of this study, all five destructive tested variables (maximum force until screw pull-out, maximum elongation until screw pull-out, energy to pull out the screw, fracture resistance in flexion and maximum constrain of compression) were statistically significantly superior in the control group. All seven nondestructive variables (Young's modulus in flexion, Young's modulus in shear stress, Young's modulus in compression, Elastic conventional limit in compression, lengthening to rupture in compression, resilience in compression and Vickers Hardness) showed no significant difference. DISCUSSION: Descriptive statistical results suggest a tendency for the biomechanical characteristics of decellularized bone to decrease compared with the control group. However, statistical inferences demonstrated a slight significant superiority of the control group with destructive mechanical stresses. Nondestructive mechanical tests (within the elastic phase of Young's modulus) were not significantly different.
