Fast-track cardiac anaesthesia in the elderly: effect of two different anaesthetic techniques on mental recovery.

Elderly patients may be considered for 'fast-track' cardiac anaesthesia, but can suffer psychological complications and slow recovery of mental function after surgery, which can interfere with recovery. Reduced metabolism and changed distribution of anaesthetic and sedative agents can cause poor recovery. We made a prospective randomized comparison of mental function, haemodynamic stability and extubation and discharge times in elderly patients (65-79 yr) receiving two premedication, anaesthetic and sedative techniques. Patients received either propofol (n=39) (fentanyl 10-15 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2-6 mg kg(-1) intraoperatively and a propofol infusion for 3 h postoperatively) or premedication with lorazepam followed by midazolam for anaesthesia (n=39) (fentanyl 10-15 microg kg(-1) and midazolam 0.05-0.075 mg kg(-1) intraoperatively and a midazolam infusion for 3 h postoperatively). Impairment of mental function was noted in 41% of patients in the propofol group and 83% in the lorazepam and midazolam group (P=0.001) 18 h after extubation. Patients in the propofol group were extubated earlier [1.4 (SD 0.6) vs 1.9 (0.8) h, P=0.02]; and reached standard intensive care unit discharge criteria [7.6 (4.6) vs 14.2 (13) h, P=0.02] and hospital discharge criteria [4.3 (1.0) vs 4.9 (1.1) days, P=0.04) sooner than patients in the lorazepam and midazolam group, but actual discharge times did not differ between the groups. Haemodynamic values were stable in both groups.

Quality of life following transplantation of the heart, liver, and lungs.

The purpose of this study was to describe the quality of life of patients who have received a transplant of the heart, liver, and lungs. We wished to document how the different patient groups fared in relation to each other with respect to physical, psychological, and social functioning, as well as in relation to published normative data. We also wished to identify factors that contribute to better functioning. We sent out a questionnaire by mail and received responses from 55 heart, 149 liver, and 59 lung transplant recipients (82% response rate). Measures included the SF-36, Mental Health Inventory, the State Anxiety Inventory, the UCLA Loneliness Scale-Revised, a quality of life measure that rated degree of improvement since transplantation, a measure of degree of difficulty in following medical and lifestyle regimens, sleep disturbance, and the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale. Results indicated that lung transplant patients reported better functioning than heart or liver transplant patients in all three domains of physical, psychological, and social functioning. Lung patients' level of functioning was equivalent to or better than published norms for the SF-36. Heart and liver recipients reported equivalent functioning to published norms in some domains, but reported impairment in the areas of physical and social functioning. Heart patients especially reported greater intrusiveness of their illness on their daily lives and indicated more difficulty complying with their lifestyle regimen. In all three groups, a large majority of patients reported feeling that life had improved since transplant with respect to health, energy level, activity level, and overall quality of life. Fewer patients reported improvements in the areas of sex life, marriage, family relationships, and social relationships. Where there were differences among the three patient groups, again it was the lung patients who reported more improvement in life since transplantation. Patients with better physical functioning tended to have more energy and pep, to be younger, to see themselves as being in better health, to feel less intrusion on their lives of their illness, and to be employed. Those with better psychological functioning tended to report less sleep disturbance, less loneliness, better social functioning, more vitality, and to be older. Better social functioning was associated with better mental health, less illness intrusiveness, and less role impairment as a result of physical or emotional factors. Relatively few patients-roughly a quarter of the total sample-reported that they were working either full or part time. We conclude that transplantation results in improved quality of life overall, but that problems persist for some patients in their physical and social functioning. Interventions aimed at improving rehabilitation in specific targeted areas may enable patients to resume a more fulfilling lifestyle posttransplant.

Total intravenous anesthesia with a continuous propofol-alfentanil infusion.

A total intravenous anesthetic using propofol and alfentanil was evaluated to determine if it would provide a shorter recovery-room stay than a more traditional balanced anesthetic using isoflurane and alfentanil. Forty-three ASA I or II patients between 17 and 50 years of age undergoing major abdominal or orthopedic procedures were studied. The propofol group received alfentanil 50 mg/kg followed by propofol 1 mg/kg for anesthesia induction. Continuous propofol infusion was initiated at induction using 170 mg/kg/min for 10 minutes, followed by 130 mg/kg/min for 10 minutes, then maintained at 100 mg/kg/min until 10 minutes before the end of surgery. Ventilation was supported with an air-oxygen mixture. The group receiving balanced anesthesia received alfentanil 1 mg/kg, and anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental 4 mg/kg. A 1% isoflurane inhalation with air-oxygen was initiated immediately upon induction. Both groups received a continuous infusion of alfentanil titrated to maintain heart rate within 10% of preinduction levels. Recovery from anesthesia was measured using a subjective pain assessment, a verbal fluency test, and a short-term memory test. No differences were detected in the rate of recovery at 30 minutes or 60 minutes postextubation. Hemodynamic stability during induction and intubation was slightly better in the propofol group than in the isoflurane group. One episode each of intraoperative awareness and delayed eye opening occurred in the propofol group. Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil is just as effective as a balanced inhalation anesthetic and provides equally rapid recovery. However, practitioners are cautioned to include an amnestic adjuvant when using propofol as the sole anesthetic agent.