Metal artifact reduction in ultra-high-resolution cone-beam CT imaging with a twin robotic X-ray system.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been shown to be a powerful tool for 3D imaging of the appendicular skeleton, allowing for detailed visualization of bone microarchitecture. This study was designed to compare artifacts in the presence of osteosynthetic implants between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in cadaveric wrist scans. A total of 32 scan protocols with varying tube potential and current were employed: both conventional CBCT and MDCT studies were included with tube voltage ranging from 60 to 140 kVp as well as additional MDCT protocols with dedicated spectral shaping via tin prefiltration. Irrespective of scanner type, all examinations were conducted in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan mode. For reconstruction of UHR-CBCT scans an additional iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm was employed, an image correction tool which cannot be used in combination with UHR-MDCT. To compare applied radiation doses between both scanners, the volume computed tomography dose index for a 16 cm phantom (CTDIvol) was evaluated. Images were assessed regarding subjective and objective image quality. Without automatic tube current modulation or tube potential control, radiation doses ranged between 1.3 mGy (with 70 kVp and 50.0 effective mAs) and 75.2 mGy (with 140 kVp and 383.0 effective mAs) in UHR-MDCT. Using the pulsed image acquisition method of the CBCT scanner, CTDIvol ranged between 2.3 mGy (with 60 kVp and 0.6 mean mAs per pulse) and 61.0 mGy (with 133 kVp and 2.5 mean mAs per pulse). In essence, all UHR-CBCT protocols employing a tube potential of 80 kVp or more were found to provide superior overall image quality and artifact reduction compared to UHR-MDCT (all p < .050). Interrater reliability of seven radiologists regarding image quality was substantial for tissue assessment and moderate for artifact assessment with Fleiss kappa of 0.652 (95% confidence interval 0.618-0.686; p < 0.001) and 0.570 (95% confidence interval 0.535-0.606; p < 0.001), respectively. Our results demonstrate that the UHR-CBCT scan mode of a twin robotic X-ray system facilitates excellent visualization of the appendicular skeleton in the presence of metal implants. Achievable image quality and artifact reduction are superior to dose-comparable UHR-MDCT and even MDCT protocols employing spectral shaping with tin prefiltration do not achieve the same level of artifact reduction in adjacent soft tissue.

Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns.

BACKGROUND: Morphology and glenoid involvement determine the necessity of surgical management in scapula fractures. While being present in only a small share of patients with shoulder trauma, numerous classification systems have been in use over the years for categorization of scapula fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the established AO/OTA classification in comparison to the classification system of Euler and Rüedi (ER) with regard to interobserver reliability and confidence in clinical practice. METHODS: Based on CT imaging, 149 patients with scapula fractures were retrospectively categorized by two trauma surgeons and two radiologists using the classification systems of ER and AO/OTA. To measure the interrater reliability, Fleiss kappa (κ) was calculated independently for both fracture classifications. Rater confidence was stated subjectively on a five-point scale and compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Additionally, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on absolute agreement in a two-way random effects model to assess the diagnostic confidence agreement between observers. RESULTS: In scapula fractures involving the glenoid fossa, interrater reliability was substantial (κ = 0.722; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.676-0.769) for the AO/OTA classification in contrast to moderate agreement (κ = 0.579; 95% CI 0.525-0.634) for the ER classification system. Diagnostic confidence for intra-articular fracture patterns was superior using the AO/OTA classification compared to ER (p < 0.001) with higher confidence agreement (ICC: 0.882 versus 0.831). For extra-articular fractures, ER (κ = 0.817; 95% CI 0.771-0.863) provided better interrater reliability compared to AO/OTA (κ = 0.734; 95% CI 0.692-0.776) with higher diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001) and superior agreement between confidence ratings (ICC: 0.881 versus 0.912). CONCLUSIONS: The AO/OTA classification is most suitable to categorize intra-articular scapula fractures with glenoid involvement, whereas the classification system of Euler and Rüedi appears to be superior in extra-articular injury patterns with fractures involving only the scapula body, spine, acromion and coracoid process.

Twin robotic x-ray system in small bone and joint trauma: impact of cone-beam computed tomography on treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVES: Trauma evaluation of extremities can be challenging in conventional radiography. A multi-use x-ray system with cone-beam CT (CBCT) option facilitates ancillary 3-D imaging without repositioning. We assessed the clinical value of CBCT scans by analyzing the influence of additional findings on therapy. METHODS: Ninety-two patients underwent radiography and subsequent CBCT imaging with the twin robotic scanner (76 wrist/hand/finger and 16 ankle/foot/toe trauma scans). Reports by on-call radiologists before and after CBCT were compared regarding fracture detection, joint affliction, comminuted injuries, and diagnostic confidence. An orthopedic surgeon recommended therapy based on reported findings. Surgical reports (N = 52) and clinical follow-up (N = 85) were used as reference standard. RESULTS: CBCT detected more fractures (83/64 of 85), joint involvements (69/53 of 71), and multi-fragment situations (68/50 of 70) than radiography (all p < 0.001). Six fractures suspected in radiographs were ruled out by CBCT. Treatment changes based on additional information from CBCT were recommended in 29 patients (31.5%). While agreement between advised therapy before CBCT and actual treatment was moderate (κ = 0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.35-0.47]; p < 0.001), agreement after CBCT was almost perfect (κ = 0.88 [0.83-0.93]; p < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased considerably for CBCT studies (p < 0.001). Median effective dose for CBCT was 4.3 µSv [3.3-5.3 µSv] compared to 0.2 µSv [0.1-0.2 µSv] for radiography. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT provides advantages for the evaluation of acute small bone and joint trauma by detecting and excluding extremity fractures and fracture-related findings more reliably than radiographs. Additional findings induced therapy change in one third of patients, suggesting substantial clinical impact. KEY POINTS: • With cone-beam CT, extremity fractures and fracture-related findings can be detected and ruled out more reliably than with conventional radiography. • Additional diagnostic information provided by cone-beam CT scans has substantial impact on therapy in small bone and joint trauma. • For distal extremity injury assessment, one-stop-shop imaging without repositioning is feasible with the twin robotic x-ray system.