Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of the helicase-primase inhibitor pritelivir following treatment of wild-type or pritelivir-resistant virus infection in a murine herpes simplex virus 1 infection model.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections can cause considerable morbidity. Transmission of HSV-2 has become a major health concern, since it has been shown to promote transmission of other sexually transmitted diseases. Pritelivir (AIC316, BAY 57-1293) belongs to a new class of HSV antiviral compounds, the helicase-primase inhibitors, which have a mode of action that is distinct from that of antiviral nucleoside analogues currently in clinical use. Analysis of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters is a useful tool for the selection of appropriate doses in clinical trials, especially for compounds belonging to new classes for which no or only limited data on therapeutic profiles are available. For this purpose, the effective dose of pritelivir was determined in a comprehensive mouse model of HSV infection. Corresponding plasma concentrations were measured, and exposures were compared with efficacious concentrations derived from cell cultures. The administration of pritelivir at 10 mg/kg of body weight once daily for 4 days completely suppressed any signs of HSV infection in the animals. Associated plasma concentrations adjusted for protein binding stayed above the cell culture 90% effective concentration (EC90) for HSV-1 for almost the entire dosing interval. Interestingly, by increasing the dose 6-fold and prolonging the treatment duration to 8 days, it was possible to treat mice infected with an approximately 30-fold pritelivir-resistant but fully pathogenic HSV-1 virus. Corresponding plasma concentrations exceeded the EC90 of this mutant for <8 h, indicating that even suboptimal exposure to pritelivir is sufficient to achieve antiviral efficacy, possibly augmented by other factors such as the immune system.

Helicase-primase inhibitors for herpes simplex virus: looking to the future of non-nucleoside inhibitors for treating herpes virus infections.

Helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) are the first new family of potent herpes virus (herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus) inhibitors to go beyond the preliminary stages of investigation since the emergence of the original nucleoside analog inhibitors. To consider the clinical future of HPIs, this review puts the exciting new findings with two HPIs, amenamevir and pritelivir, into the historical context of antiviral development for the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus over the last century and, on this basis, the authors speculate on the potential evolution of these and other non-nucleoside inhibitors in the future.

Baseline sensitivity of HSV-1 and HSV-2 clinical isolates and defined acyclovir-resistant strains to the helicase-primase inhibitor pritelivir.

Fifty-nine US isolates of HSV-1 and HSV-2 obtained between 1998 and 2004 were tested for sensitivity to the helicase-primase inhibitor, pritelivir (AIC316, BAY 57-1293) by plaque-reduction assay. All isolates, which were collected prior to any clinical use of primase-helicase inhibitors, were sensitive and showed mean EC50 values of 0.026 and 0.029µM for HSV-1 and HSV-2, respectively. Furthermore, several laboratory-selected acyclovir-resistant HSV mutants were also sensitive to pritelivir. These data provide a baseline for HSV sensitivity to pritelivir in general population before it is introduced and broadly used to treat HSV infection. The data also validate pritelivir as an appropriate therapy for nucleoside-resistant HSV infections.

Antiviral agents for herpes simplex virus.

This review starts with a brief description of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), the clinical diseases they cause, and the continuing clinical need for antiviral chemotherapy. A historical overview describes the progress from the early, rather toxic antivirals to acyclovir (ACV) which led the way for its prodrug, valacyclovir, to penciclovir and its prodrug, famciclovir (FCV). These compounds have been the mainstay of HSV therapy for two decades and have established a remarkable safety record. This review focuses on these compounds, the preclinical studies which reveal potentially important differences, the clinical trials, and the clinical experience through two decades. Some possible areas for further investigation are suggested. The focus shifts to new approaches and novel compounds, in particular, the combination of ACV with hydrocortisone, known as ME609 or zovirax duo, an HSV helicase-primase inhibitor, pritelivir (AIC316), and CMX001, the cidofovir prodrug for treating resistant HSV infection in immunocompromised patients. Letermovir has established that the human cytomegalovirus terminase enzyme is a valid target and that similar compounds could be sought for HSV. We discuss the difficulties facing the progression of new compounds. In our concluding remarks, we summarize the present situation including a discussion on the reclassification of FCV from prescription-only to pharmacist-controlled for herpes labialis in New Zealand in 2010; should this be repeated more widely? We conclude that HSV research is emerging from a quiescent phase.

Recent developments in anti-herpesvirus drugs.

Background Herpesviruses notably establish lifelong infections, with latency and reactivation. Many of the known human herpesviruses infect large proportions of the population worldwide. Treatment or prevention of herpes infections and recurrent disease still pose a challenge in the 21st century. Sources of data Original papers and review articles, meeting abstracts, a book (Clinical Virology; DD Richman, RJ Whitley & FG Hayden eds) and company web sites. Areas of agreement For herpes simplex types 1 and 2 and for varicella zoster, acyclovir (ACV; now increasingly replaced by its prodrug valacyclovir, VACV) and famciclovir (FCV) have greatly reduced the burden of disease and have established a remarkable safety record. Drug-resistance, in the otherwise healthy population, has remained below 0.5% after more that 20 years of antiviral use. In immunocompromised patients, drug resistance is more common and alternative drugs with good safety profiles are desirable. For human cytomegalovirus disease, which occurs in immunocompromised patients, ganciclovir and increasingly its prodrug valganciclovir are the drugs of choice. However, alternative drugs, with better safety, are much needed. Areas of controversy Various questions are highlighted. Should the new 1-day therapies for recurrent herpes labialis and genital herpes replace the current standard multi-day therapies? The marked differences between VACV and FCV (e.g. triphosphate stability, effect on latency) may not yet be fully exploited? Do current antivirals reduce post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN)? For immunocompromised patients with varicella zoster virus (VZV) disease, should the first-line treatment be FCV, not ACV or VACV? Should there be more support to explore new avenues for current antivirals, for example in possibly reducing herpes latency or Alzheimer's disease (AD)? Should primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease in adolescents be treated with antivirals? How can new compounds be progressed when the perceived market need is small but the medical need is great. FCV was reclassified from prescription-only to pharmacist-controlled for herpes labialis in New Zealand in 2010; should this be repeated more widely? This article reviews new drugs in clinical trials and highlights some of the problems hindering their progress.

The helicase-primase complex as a target for effective herpesvirus antivirals.

Herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus have been treated for more that half a century using nucleoside analogues. However, there is still an unmet clinical need for improved herpes antivirals. The successful compounds, acyclovir; penciclovir and their orally bioavailable prodrugs valaciclovir and famciclovir, ultimately block virus replication by inhibiting virus-specific DNA-polymerase. The helicase-primase (HP) complex offers a distinctly different target for specific inhibition of virus DNA synthesis. This review describes the synthetic programmes that have already led to two HP-inhibitors (HPI) that have commenced clinical trials in man. One of these (known as AIC 316) continues in clinical development to date. The specificity of HPI is reflected by the ability to select drug-resistant mutants. The role of HP-antiviral resistance will be considered and how the study of cross--resistance among mutants already shows subtle differences between compounds in this respect. The impact of resistance on the drug development in the clinic will also be considered. Finally, herpesvirus latency remains as the most important barrier to a therapeutic cure. Whether or not helicase primase inhibitors alone or in combination with nucleoside analogues can impact on this elusive goal remains to be seen.

Antiviral drug resistance and helicase-primase inhibitors of herpes simplex virus.

A new class of chemical inhibitors has been discovered that interferes with the process of herpesvirus DNA replication. To date, the majority of useful herpesvirus antivirals are nucleoside analogues that block herpesvirus DNA replication by targeting the DNA polymerase. The new helicase-primase inhibitors (HPI) target a different enzyme complex that is also essential for herpesvirus DNA replication. This review will place the HPI in the context of previous work on the nucleoside analogues. Several promising highly potent HPI will be described with a particular focus on the identification of drug-resistance mutations. Several HPI have good pharmacological profiles and are now at the outset of phase II clinical trials. Provided there are no safety issues to stop their progress, this new class of compound will be a major advance in the herpesvirus antiviral field. Furthermore, HPI are likely to have a major impact on the therapy and prevention of herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients alone or in combination with current nucleoside analogues. The possibility of acquired drug-resistance to HPI will then become an issue of great practical importance.

Mismatch primer-based PCR reveals that helicase-primase inhibitor resistance mutations pre-exist in herpes simplex virus type 1 clinical isolates and are not induced during incubation with the inhibitor.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies suggested that helicase-primase inhibitor (HPI) resistance mutations can be selected at relatively high frequency from some isolates of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). An intentional mismatch primer (IMP) PCR was developed to detect three known HPI resistance mutations well above the expected background frequency. The objective of this study was to provide proof that HPI resistance mutations pre-exist at relatively high frequency in some clinical isolates obtained from individuals naive to HPIs. METHODS: Three different IMP PCRs were standardized to detect critical HPI resistance mutations (K356N or K356T in UL5, or A899T in UL52) at 10-100 times the expected background frequency (<10(-6)). Thirty HSV-1 clinical isolates were then screened for the resistance mutations in the absence of the inhibitor using IMP PCR. RESULTS: Among 30 clinical isolates that were all susceptible to the HPI, BAY 57-1293, 5 were shown to contain UL5 mutations at 10-100 times higher than the expected frequency. No UL52 resistance mutations were encountered in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of HPI-resistant mutations in some clinical isolates by means of IMP PCR proved that the mutations pre-exist and showed that they are not induced during incubation with the inhibitor.

Effects of therapy using a helicase-primase inhibitor (HPI) in mice infected with deliberate mixtures of wild-type HSV-1 and an HPI-resistant UL5 mutant.

Point mutations in the HSV-1 UL5 (helicase) gene confer resistance to helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs), e.g. BAY 57-1293. Such mutations normally occur at a frequency of < or =10(-6)PFU. However, individual HSV-1 laboratory strains and some clinical isolates contained resistance mutations (e.g. UL5: Lys356Asn) at 10(-4)PFU. To address the possibility that pre-existing mutants at high frequency might have an impact on therapy using HPIs, deliberate mixtures were prepared to contain the SC16 UL5: Lys356Asn mutant in SC16 wild-type in the proportion of 1/500 or 1/50PFU. Mice were infected in the neck-skin with 5x10(4)PFU/mouse of wt alone, mutant alone, or the respective mixture. The mutant could not be detected in infectious virus yields from mice inoculated with the 1/500 mixture. However, resistant mutant was recovered from some treated mice inoculated with the 1/50 mixture. All mice inoculated with mixtures remained responsive to BAY 57-1293-therapy with no increase in clinical signs compared to treatment of wt-infected mice.

A mutation in helicase motif IV of herpes simplex virus type 1 UL5 that results in reduced growth in vitro and lower virulence in a murine infection model is related to the predicted helicase structure.

A variant was selected from a clinical isolate of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) during a single passage in the presence of a helicase-primase inhibitor (HPI) at eight times the IC(50). The variant was approximately 40-fold resistant to the HPI BAY 57-1293 and it showed significantly reduced growth in tissue culture with a concomitant reduction in virulence in a murine infection model. The variant contained a single mutation (Asn342Lys) in the UL5 predicted functional helicase motif IV. The Asn342Lys mutation was transferred to a laboratory strain, PDK cl-1, and the recombinant acquired the expected resistance and reduced growth characteristics. Comparative modelling and docking studies predicted the Asn342 position to be physically distant from the HPI interaction pocket formed by UL5 and UL52 (primase). We suggest that this mutation results in steric/allosteric modification of the HPI-binding pocket, conferring an indirect resistance to the HPI. Slower growth and moderately reduced virulence suggest that this mutation might also interfere with the helicase-primase activity.

Antiviral Chemistry & Chemotherapy's current antiviral agents FactFile (2nd edition): DNA viruses.

Although most of the recent attempts to develop new antiviral agents have been focussed on RNA viruses (in particular, HIV and hepatitis C virus), a few new compounds are now awaiting their entry into the field of DNA viruses, particularly poxviruses, such as variola virus, because of the bioterrorist context, and herpesviruses, such as herpes simplex virus and cytomegalovirus, where the market scene has for many years been dominated by acyclovir, penciclovir and ganciclovir and their respective orally bioavailable prodrugs: valaciclovir, famciclovir and valganciclovir. Here, we review the current 'state of the art' with old compounds ready to rotate off and new compounds eagerly awaiting to appear on the continuously evolving scene of antiviral drug development.

Antiviral Chemistry & Chemotherapy's current antiviral agents FactFile (2nd edition): retroviruses and hepadnaviruses.

There are at present exactly 25 compounds that have been formally approved for the treatment of retrovirus (that is HIV) infections: seven nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), one nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI), four non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 10 protease inhibitors (PIs), one coreceptor inhibitor (CRI), one fusion inhibitor (FI) and one integrase inhibitor (INI). Other compounds expected to be approved for the treatment of HIV infections in the near future are the NNRTI rilpivirine, the CRI vicriviroc and the INI elvitegravir. To obtain synergistic activity, enable lower dosage levels, thus minimizing toxic side effects, and particularly to reduce the risk of drug resistance development, common wisdom dictates that the HIV inhibitors should be used in drug combination regimens. Although, given the number of compounds available, the drug combinations that could be concocted are uncountable, only one triple-drug combination has so far been formulated as single pill to be taken orally once daily, namely Atripla containing the NtRTI tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, the NRTI emtricitabine and the NNRTI efavirenz. Here, we document these approved compounds along with other HIV-active compounds and, for the first time, compounds whose principal activity is against hepatitis B virus. The logic of this new division being the enzymatic similarity between the reverse transcriptase of HIV and hepatitis B virus; the strategies for the development of antiviral agents to combat them have much in common.

Antiviral Chemistry & Chemotherapy's current antiviral agents FactFile 2008 (2nd edition): RNA viruses.

Among the RNA viruses, other than the retroviruses (that is, HIV), which are dealt with separately in the current FactFile, the most important targets for the development of antiviral agents at the moment are the orthomyxoviruses (that is, influenza), the hepaciviruses (that is, hepatitis C virus [HCV]) and, to a lesser extent, the picornaviruses. Although the uncoating inhibitors amantadine and rimantadine were the first known inhibitors of influenza A, the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir, zanamivir and peramivir have now become the prime antiviral drugs for the treatment of influenza A and B virus infections. For HCV infections, standard treatment consists of the combination of pegylated interferon-alpha with ribavirin, but several other antivirals targeted at specific viral functions such as the HCV protease and/ or polymerase may be expected to soon take an important share of this important market. Still untapped is the potential of a variety of uncoating inhibitors, as well as protease and/or polymerase inhibitors against the wide spectrum of picornaviruses. While ribavirin has been available for 35 years as a broad-spectrum anti-RNA virus agent, relatively new and unexplored is favipiravir (T-705) accredited with activity against influenza as well as flaviviruses, bunyaviruses and arenaviruses.

Development of a quantitative real-time TaqMan PCR assay for testing the susceptibility of feline herpesvirus-1 to antiviral compounds.

Feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) is considered as the most common viral infection of domestic cats worldwide. It causes a disease characterized by upper respiratory and ocular clinical signs. Several attempts are currently underway to develop antiviral chemotherapy for treating FHV-1 infections. The availability of a rapid quantitative method for detecting FHV-1 would greatly facilitate prompt therapy, and hence enhance the success of any antiviral regime. In this study, a TaqMan real-time PCR assay was established for measuring FHV-1 DNA levels in culture supernatants. This assay was shown to be highly specific, reproducible and allows quantitation over a range of 2 to 2 x 10(8) copies per reaction. The assay was then applied to measure the reduction of FHV-1 DNA levels in the presence of increasing concentrations of acyclovir (ACV), penciclovir (PCV) and cidofovir (CDV). The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50s)) obtained with the B927 laboratory strain of FHV-1 were 15.8 microM for ACV, 7.93 microM for CDV and 1.2 microM for PCV. The assay described here is sensitive, time-saving and does not involve prior titration of virus stocks or monitoring virus-induced cytopathic effects. Therefore, it is suitable for routine anti-FHV-1 drug susceptibility testing in veterinary clinics.

Herpes simplex virus helicase-primase inhibitors: recent findings from the study of drug resistance mutations.

After several decades during which nucleoside analogues (especially acyclovir and penciclovir and their prodrugs) have benefited many patients suffering from herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections, the discovery of the helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) represents an interesting new approach. Although antiviral resistance has not been a major problem for nucleoside analogues in immunocompetent patients, the problem of acyclovir resistance in immunocompromised patients is well documented. Several HPIs are extremely potent antiviral compounds and may, therefore, offer an important alternative therapy in these patients. The potential for synergy, not just for the inhibition of virus replication but also to delay the appearance of drug-resistant virus, needs to be thoroughly investigated. The study of resistance to HPIs has been important towards understanding the mechanism of action of these compounds and confirming the target function. However, during the course of our studies on HPI resistance, we have made a number of interesting observations that may be relevant to their clinical use. This article draws attention to the major observations on HPI resistance reported by others and to our own recently published observations that have extended this expanding area of antiviral research.

Mutations close to functional motif IV in HSV-1 UL5 helicase that confer resistance to HSV helicase-primase inhibitors, variously affect virus growth rate and pathogenicity.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) helicase-primase (HP) is the target for a novel class of antiviral compounds, the helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs), e.g. BAY 57-1293. Although mutations in herpesviruses conferring resistance to nucleoside analogues are commonly associated with attenuation in vivo, to date, this is not necessarily true for HPIs. HPI-resistant HSV mutants selected in tissue culture are reported to be equally pathogenic compared to parental virus in animal models. Here we demonstrate that a slow-growing HSV-1 mutant, with the BAY 57-1293-resistance mutation Gly352Arg in UL5 helicase, is clearly less virulent than its wild-type parent in a murine zosteriform infection model. This contrasts with published results obtained for a mutant containing a different HPI-resistance substitution (Gly352Val) at the same location, since this mutant was reported to be fully pathogenic. We believe our report to be the first to describe an HPI-resistant HSV-1 mutant, that is markedly less virulent in vivo and slowly growing in tissue culture compared to the parental strain. Another BAY 57-1293-resistant UL5 mutant (Lys356Gln), which showed faster growth characteristics in cell culture, however, was at least equally virulent compared to the parent strain.