Alveolar crystal burden in stone workers with artificial stone silicosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An epidemic of silicosis has emerged due to a failure to control risks associated with exposure to high-silica content respirable dust generated while working with artificial stone products. Methods for quantification of alveolar crystal burden are needed to advance our understanding of the pathobiology of silica-related lung injury as well as assisting in the diagnosis, clinical management and prognostication of affected workers. The objective of this study was to develop and validate novel methods to quantify alveolar crystal burden in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from patients with artificial stone silicosis. METHODS: New methods to quantify and analyse alveolar crystal in BAL from patients with artificial stone silicosis were developed. Crystals were isolated and counted by microscopy and alveolar crystal burden was calculated using a standard curve generated by titration of respirable α-Quartz. The utility of the assay was then assessed in 23 patients with artificial stone silicosis. RESULTS: Alveolar crystal burden was greater in patients with silicosis (0.44 picograms [pg]/cell [0.08-3.49]) compared to patients with other respiratory diagnoses (0.057 pg/cell [0.01-0.34]; p < 0.001). Alveolar crystal burden was positively correlated with years of silica exposure (ρ = 0.49, p = 0.02) and with decline in diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (ρ = -0.50, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Alveolar crystal burden quantification differentiates patients with silicosis from patients with other respiratory disorders. Furthermore, crystal burden is correlated with the rate of decline in lung function in patients with artificial stone silicosis.

Multivisceral Transplant, The Prince Charles Hospital Experience.

BACKGROUND: Multi-visceral organ transplant is uncommon. As a result of the rarity of these surgeries, there are limited studies, making it difficult to interpret outcomes and identify specific patient complications. We aim to assess the indications for multi-organ transplant, the time on the wait-list and evaluate outcomes including patient survival, graft survival and postoperative complications in an Australian context. METHODS: Patients undergoing multi-organ transplant from 1993 to 2018 at The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia were retrospectively reviewed, looking at baseline characteristics and post-transplant morbidity, mortality and graft survival. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were included in the study, comprising 22 heart-lung transplants, eight heart-kidney transplants and seven heart-lung-liver transplants. There were six domino heart transplants performed, all in the heart-lung-liver transplant group. The mean age at transplant was 37 years and the mean wait-list time was 10 months. One patient, receiving a heart-lung transplant, required re-transplantation (bilateral lung) at 3 years. One-year (1-year) survival was 91% for heart-lung transplants, 86% for heart-lung-liver transplants and 87.5% for heart-kidney transplants. Five- and ten-year (5- and 10-year) survival was 79% for both in heart-lung transplant, 43% and 29% for heart-lung-liver transplant and 87.5% for both in heart-kidney transplant. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing multi-organ transplant at our unit had long-term survival and organ function comparable to international data. In addition, waitlist time for multi-organ transplant was not found to be excessive.