RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer related death worldwide. Surgery with or without chemotherapy is the most common approach with curative intent; however, the prognosis is poor as mortality rates remain high. Several indexes have been proposed in the past few years in order to estimate the survival of patients undergoing gastrectomy. The preoperative nutritional status of gastric cancer patients has recently gained attention as a factor that could affect the postoperative course and various indexes have been developed. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the role of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in predicting the survival of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent. AIM: To investigate the role of PNI in predicting the survival of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A thorough literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane library was performed for studies comparing the overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer after surgical resection depending on the preoperative PNI value. The PRISMA algorithm was used in the screening process and finally 16 studies were included in this systematic review. The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). RESULTS: Sixteen studies involving 14551 patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma undergoing open or laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this systematic review. The patients were divided into high- and low-PNI groups according to cut-off values that were set according to previous reports or by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in each individual study. The 5-year OS of patients in the low-PNI groups ranged between 39% and 70.6%, while in the high-PNI groups, it ranged between 54.9% and 95.8%. In most of the included studies, patients with high preoperative PNI showed statistically significant better OS than the low PNI groups. In multivariate analyses, low PNI was repeatedly recognised as an independent prognostic factor for poor survival. CONCLUSION: According to the present study, low preoperative PNI seems to be an indicator of poor OS of patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric or gastroesophageal cancer.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is a major health concern worldwide. Surgical resection and chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for gastric carcinoma, however, the optimal approach remains unclear and should be different in each individual. Chemotherapy can be administered both pre- and postoperatively, but a multidisciplinary approach is preferred when possible. This is particularly relevant for locally advanced GC (LAGC), as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) could potentially lead to tumor downsizing thus allowing for a complete resection with curative intent. Even though the recent progress has been impressive, European and International guidelines are still controversial, thus attenuating the need for a more standardized approach in the management of locally advanced cancer. AIM: To investigate the effects of NAT on the overall survival (OS), the disease-free survival (DFS), the morbidity and the mortality of patients with LAGC in comparison to upfront surgery (US). METHODS: For this systematic review, a literature search was conducted between November and February 2023 in PubMed, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov for studies including patients with LAGC. Two independent reviewers conducted the research and extracted the data according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to form the search strategy and the study protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 4839 patients with LAGC in total were included in our systematic review. Patients were separated into two groups; one receiving NAT before the gastrectomy (NAT group) and the other undergoing upfront surgery (US group). The OS ranged from 41.6% to 74.2% in the NAT group and from 30.9% to 74% in the US group. The DFS was also longer in the NAT group and reached up to 80% in certain patients. The complications related to the chemotherapy or the surgery ranged from 6.4% to 38.1% in the NAT group and from 5% to 40.5% in the US group. Even though in most of the studies the morbidity was lower in the NAT group, a general conclusion could not be drawn as it seems to depend on multiple factors. Finally, regarding the mortality, the reported rate was higher and up to 5.3% in the US group. CONCLUSION: NAT could be beneficial for patients with LAGC as it leads to better OS and DFS than the US approach with the same or even lower complication rates. However, patients with different clinicopathological features respond differently to chemotherapy, therefore currently the treatment plan should be individualized in order to achieve optimal results.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The inflammatory response to tumor has been proven to be closely related to the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a widely available inflammatory biomarker that may have prognostic value for patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). AIM: To assess the role of NLR as a prognostic factor of survival and tumor recurrence in patients with CRLM. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted by two independent researchers in order to minimize potential errors and bias. Conflicts were discussed and settled between three researchers. Studies including patients undergoing different types of medical interventions for the treatment of CRLM and evaluating the correlation between pretreatment NLR and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were included in the review. Nineteen studies, involving 3283 patients matched our inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In the studies included, NLR was measured before the intervention and the NLR thresholds ranged between 1.9 and 7.26. Most studies used 5 as the cut-off value. Liver metastases were treated with hepatectomy with or without chemotherapy regimens in 13 studies and with radiofrequency ablation, radioembolization, chemoembolization or solely with chemotherapy in 6 studies. High NLR was associated with decreased OS and DFS after liver resection or other medical intervention. Moreover, high NLR was associated with poor chemosensitivity. On the contrary, CRLM patients with low pretreatment NLR demonstrated improved OS and DFS. NLR could potentially be used as a predictive factor of survival and tumor recurrence in patients with CRLM treated with interventions of any modality, including surgery, chemotherapy and ablative techniques. CONCLUSION: NLR is an inflammatory biomarker that demonstrates considerable prognostic value. Elevated pretreatment NLR is associated with poor OS and DFS in patients with CRLM who are submitted to different treatments.
