Pediatric Kidney Transplantation-Living or Deceased Donor?

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is ideal for children and adolescents with chronic end-stage renal disease because it offers better growth, development, and quality of life. Donor choice is vitally important in this age group, given the long life expectancy of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (<18 years) who underwent kidney transplantation from January 1999 to December/2018 was performed. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between living and deceased donor transplants. RESULTS: We included 59 pediatric kidney transplant recipients, 12 from a living donor and 47 from a deceased donor. Thirty-six (61.0%) patients were boys, and 5 (8.5%) had a retransplant. There were no differences between groups on sex, race, and weight of the recipient and donor, as well as the age and the etiology of the recipient's primary disease. Most recipients received induction immunosuppression with basiliximab and maintenance with triple therapy, with no differences between groups. Living donor transplants were mostly pre-emptive (58.3% vs 4.3%, P < .001) and had fewer HLA mismatches (≤3: 90.9% vs 13.0%, P < .001), older donors (38.4 vs 24.3 years, P < .001) and shorter hospital stays (8.8 vs 14.1 days, P = .004). There were no statistically significant differences regarding medical-surgical complications and graft or patient survival. However, we found that at 13 years post-transplant 91.7% of the living donor grafts were functioning vs 72.3% of the deceased donor grafts. CONCLUSION: Our experience points out that a living donor graft in pediatric patients is associated with a higher probability of pre-emptive transplant, shorter hospital stay, greater HLA compatibility, and increased graft survival.

Novel hormonal agents for metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: comparing outcomes. A single-center retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, accounting for 15% of all diagnosed cancers and is the sixth leading cause of cancerrelated deaths amongst men worldwide. Abiraterone and enzalutamide were the first two novel hormonal agents approved for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer but there is a lack of quality evidence regarding which is associated with better outcomes and who would benefit the most with one or another of these drugs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of real-world patients submitted to treatment with novel hormonal agents, enzalutamide and abiraterone, for castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer in an academic center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated for castration-resistant prostate cancer with either abiraterone or enzulatamide between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019. The primary endpoints were biochemical response, biochemical progression, radiological progression, clinical deterioration (attributed to disease progression) and death. RESULTS: Enzalutamide had a higher biochemical response rate than abiraterone in patients with mCRPC (77.1% vs 58.1%, p = 0.016). Achieving a biochemical response was associated with a lower risk of biochemical progression (OR: 0.248, p = 0.017) and death (OR: 0.302, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Enzalutamide conferred higher biochemical response rate than abiraterone in patients with mCRPC. Despite the trend to better performance of other endpoints in the enzalutamide group, it did not achieve statistical significance. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to elucidate the comparative efficacies of these agents.

Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: A feasible and safe alternative to standard laparoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Standard multi-port laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is considered the gold standard for benign adrenal tumors. Single-site LA has been proposed as a feasible and safe alternative because of lower invasiveness, improved cosmetics, less pain and shorter hospital stay. The objective was to evaluate and compare results of single-site transumbilical laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy with standard LA for adrenal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive adrenalectomies from 93 patients, performed between March 2009 and June 2017, were laparoscopically excised: 59 by standard multi-port LA (group 1) and 41 by transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (group 2). Data gathered included demographics, comorbidities, preoperative imaging, tumor characteristics, perioperative data, surgical complications, pathology and follow-up. IBM SPSS Statistics 23 software was used and p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Patients of group 2 were younger (48.7 ± 13.9 versus 59.7 ± 15.1 years; p < 0.001) and had fewer comorbidities (p < 0.05). Mean tumor diameter in group 2 was lower than those of group 1 (27.52 ± 14.3 versus 47.9 ± 30.6 mm; p < 0.001). Tumor laterality did not influence the choice of technique nor the surgical morbidity. All procedures were successfully completed, although one standard LA needed conversion to open surgery. Mean operative time, hemorrhagic losses, postoperative opioid analgesic requirement and hospital stay were not statistically different between groups. Most patients in group 2 (31 patients, 85.4%) did not require drainage, compared to 14 (25.4%) patients of group 1 (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent single-site LA resumed normal diet earlier (1.0 ± 0.2 versus 1.6 ± 0.7 days; p < 0.001). There were no reoperations and no perioperative mortality. Overall mean follow-up time was 94.9 ± 3.1 months, not statiscally different between groups (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that transumbilical approach for laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors is a feasible and safe alternative to standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy.