Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 21(2): 171-175, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27932288

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors that predispose patients who are hospitalized with pressure ulcers (PUs) colonized by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) to develop bacteremia. In addition, we also detected main phenotypes of resistance in infected and uninfected PUs. A prospective cohort study was conducted at the Clinical Hospital of the Federal University of Uberlândia including patients with Stage II or greater PUs, colonized or not with GNB, from August 2009 to July 2010. Infected ulcers were defined based on clinical signs and on positive evaluation of smears of wound material translated by a ratio of polymorphonuclear cells to epithelial cells ≥2:1, after Giemsa staining. A total of 60 patients with Stage II PUs were included. Of these 83.3% had PUs colonized and/or infected. The frequency of polymicrobial colonization was 74%. Enterobacteriaceae and GNB non-fermenting bacteria were the most frequent isolates of PUs with 44.0% of multiresistant isolates. Among patients who had infected PUs, six developed bacteremia by the same microorganism with a 100% mortality rate. In addition, PUs in hospitalized patients were major reservoir of multiresistant GNB, also a high-risk population for the development of bacteremia with high mortality rates.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/genética , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Reservatórios de Doenças/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
2.
Rev Bras Anestesiol ; 65(3): 200-6, 2015.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25435414

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization. METHODS: From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis. RESULTS: Of 68 cultured catheters, six tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45hours (18-118) (p=0.0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sphingomonas paucimobilis. CONCLUSION: Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.

3.
Wounds ; 24(3): 67-75, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25876242

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Pressure ulcers (PU) are a major reservoir of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of MRSA colonization in PU of hospitalized patients with Stage II or higher PU, to identify risk factors for colonization of these wounds, and to ascertain whether MRSA colonization of PU increases the risk of MRSA bacteremia. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Clinical Hospital of Federal University of Uberlandia, MG, Brazil. A prospective cohort study of 145 patients with Stage II or higher PU, colonized or not with MRSA, was conducted over 21 months. Infected ulcers were defined for clinical signs and for positive evaluation of smears of the wound by the ratio of polymorphonuclears to epithelial cells of ≥ 2:1, after Giemsa staining. RESULTS: Sixty-three (43.5%) MRSA colonized PU patients were identified, but none of the risk factors analyzed were independently associated with MRSA colonization. Among the patients with positive blood cultures and MRSA colonized PU, the odds ratio for MRSA bacteremia (OR = 19.0, 95% CI = 2.4-151.1, P < 0.001) and mortality rate (OR = 21.9, 95% CI = 1.23-391.5, P = 0.002), were high. Independent risk factors for MRSA bacteremia were: ≥ 2 underlying disease (OR = 6.26, 95% CI = 1.01-39.1, P = 0.05) and prior MRSA infected PU (OR = 12.75, 95% CI=1.22-132.9, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The present study identifies MRSA colonized PU patients as a potential epidemiologic reservoir for this organism and a high-risk for MRSA bacteremia, which contributes to prolonged hospitalization and poor prognosis. .

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA