Dual regulation of TxNIP by ChREBP and FoxO1 in liver.

TxNIP (Thioredoxin-interacting protein) is considered as a potential drug target for type 2 diabetes. Although TxNIP expression is correlated with hyperglycemia and glucotoxicity in pancreatic ß cells, its regulation in liver cells has been less investigated. In the current study, we aim at providing a better understanding of Txnip regulation in hepatocytes in response to physiological stimuli and in the context of hyperglycemia in db/db mice. We focused on regulatory pathways governed by ChREBP (Carbohydrate Responsive Element Binding Protein) and FoxO1 (Forkhead box protein O1), transcription factors that play central roles in mediating the effects of glucose and fasting on gene expression, respectively. Studies using genetically modified mice reveal that hepatic TxNIP is up-regulated by both ChREBP and FoxO1 in liver cells and that its expression strongly correlates with fasting, suggesting a major role for this protein in the physiological adaptation to nutrient restriction.

O-GlcNacylation Links TxNIP to Inflammasome Activation in Pancreatic ß Cells.

Thioredoxin interacting protein (TxNIP), which strongly responds to glucose, has emerged as a central mediator of glucotoxicity in pancreatic ß cells. TxNIP is a scaffold protein interacting with target proteins to inhibit or stimulate their activity. Recent studies reported that high glucose stimulates the interaction of TxNIP with the inflammasome protein NLRP3 (NLR family, pyrin domain containing 3) to increase interleukin-1 ß (IL1ß) secretion by pancreatic ß cells. To better understand the regulation of TxNIP by glucose in pancreatic ß cells, we investigated the implication of O-linked ß-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAcylation) in regulating TxNIP at the posttranslational level. O-GlcNAcylation of proteins is controlled by two enzymes: the O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT), which transfers a monosaccharide to serine/threonine residues on target proteins, and the O-GlcNAcase (OGA), which removes it. Our study shows that TxNIP is subjected to O-GlcNAcylation in response to high glucose concentrations in ß cell lines. Modification of the O-GlcNAcylation pathway through manipulation of OGT or OGA expression or activity significantly modulates TxNIP O-GlcNAcylation in INS1 832/13 cells. Interestingly, expression and O-GlcNAcylation of TxNIP appeared to be increased in islets of diabetic rodents. At the mechanistic level, the induction of the O-GlcNAcylation pathway in human and rat islets promotes inflammasome activation as evidenced by enhanced cleaved IL1ß. Overexpression of OGT in HEK293 or INS1 832/13 cells stimulates TxNIP and NLRP3 interaction, while reducing TxNIP O-GlcNAcylation through OGA overexpression destabilizes this interaction. Altogether, our study reveals that O-GlcNAcylation represents an important regulatory mechanism for TxNIP activity in ß cells.

O-GlcNAcylation Links ChREBP and FXR to Glucose-Sensing.

Accumulating evidence suggests that O-GlcNAc transferase, an enzyme responsible for O-GlcNAc post-translational modification acts as a nutrient sensor that links glucose and the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway to the regulation of transcriptional factors involved in energy homeostasis. In liver, glucose signaling is mediated by carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP), which stimulates glycolytic and lipogenic gene expression through its binding on a specific ChoRE DNA sequence. Modulation of ChREBP by O-GlcNAcylation increases its DNA binding affinity and its activity. ChREBP transcriptional activity also depends on the presence of several other co-factors and transcriptional factors. Among them, the nuclear Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR), a key transcription factor of bile acid metabolism involved in the gut-liver axis homeostasis was recently shown to directly interact with ChREBP, acting as a repressor on the ChoRE of glycolytic genes. Interestingly, similarly to ChREBP, FXR is O-GlcNAcylated in response to glucose. This review discusses the importance of ChREBP and FXR modifications through O-GlcNAcylation in liver and how glucose can modify their mutual affinity and transcriptional activity.

Novel insights into ChREBP regulation and function.

Glucose is an energy source that also controls the expression of key genes involved in energetic metabolism through the glucose-signaling transcription factor carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP). ChREBP has recently emerged as a central regulator of glycolysis and de novo fatty acid synthesis in liver, but new evidence shows that it plays a broader and crucial role in various processes, ranging from glucolipotoxicity to apoptosis and/or proliferation in specific cell types. However, several aspects of ChREBP activation by glucose metabolites are currently controversial, as well as the effects of activating or inhibiting ChREBP, on insulin sensitivity, which might depend on genetic, dietary or environmental factors. Thus, much remains to be elucidated. Here, we summarize our current understanding of the regulation and function of this fascinating transcription factor.

O-GlcNAcylation increases ChREBP protein content and transcriptional activity in the liver.

OBJECTIVE: Carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) is a key transcription factor that mediates the effects of glucose on glycolytic and lipogenic genes in the liver. We have previously reported that liver-specific inhibition of ChREBP prevents hepatic steatosis in ob/ob mice by specifically decreasing lipogenic rates in vivo. To better understand the regulation of ChREBP activity in the liver, we investigated the implication of O-linked ß-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc or O-GlcNAcylation), an important glucose-dependent posttranslational modification playing multiple roles in transcription, protein stabilization, nuclear localization, and signal transduction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: O-GlcNAcylation is highly dynamic through the action of two enzymes: the O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT), which transfers the monosaccharide to serine/threonine residues on a target protein, and the O-GlcNAcase (OGA), which hydrolyses the sugar. To modulate ChREBP(OG) in vitro and in vivo, the OGT and OGA enzymes were overexpressed or inhibited via adenoviral approaches in mouse hepatocytes and in the liver of C57BL/6J or obese db/db mice. RESULTS: Our study shows that ChREBP interacts with OGT and is subjected to O-GlcNAcylation in liver cells. O-GlcNAcylation stabilizes the ChREBP protein and increases its transcriptional activity toward its target glycolytic (L-PK) and lipogenic genes (ACC, FAS, and SCD1) when combined with an active glucose flux in vivo. Indeed, OGT overexpression significantly increased ChREBP(OG) in liver nuclear extracts from fed C57BL/6J mice, leading in turn to enhanced lipogenic gene expression and to excessive hepatic triglyceride deposition. In the livers of hyperglycemic obese db/db mice, ChREBP(OG) levels were elevated compared with controls. Interestingly, reducing ChREBP(OG) levels via OGA overexpression decreased lipogenic protein content (ACC, FAS), prevented hepatic steatosis, and improved the lipidic profile of OGA-treated db/db mice. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results reveal that O-GlcNAcylation represents an important novel regulation of ChREBP activity in the liver under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

The hexosamine biosynthesis pathway is essential for pancreatic beta cell development.

Pancreatic exocrine and endocrine cells develop during embryonic life from endodermal progenitors. This process depends on activation of a hierarchy of transcription factors. Although information is available regarding the mesodermal signals controlling pancreas development, little is known about the role of environmental factors such as nutrients, including glucose, that also may impact development. Previously, we showed that glucose plays an important and specific role in beta cell development by activating the transition of Neurogenin3-positive endocrine progenitors into beta cells. Here, we examined the implication of glucose metabolism and more precisely the role of the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway (HBP) to understand the mechanisms by which glucose regulates beta cell development. We have established an in vitro model of endocrine and exocrine cells development from embryonic day 13.5 rat pancreases in a manner that replicates in vivo pancreas development perfectly. Using this model, we tested the effect of selective inhibitors and activators of the HBP and found that the HBP has a modest effect on cell proliferation and exocrine cell differentiation. On the other hand, beta cell development is tightly controlled by the HBP. Specifically, HBP activators increase beta cell development, whereas inhibitors repress such development. Importantly, both the HBP and glucose control the same steps in beta cell development.

Control of pancreatic development by intercellular signals.

Understanding pancreatic development is important for at least three reasons: first, from a cognitive point of view, to understand the development of a complex organ, the pancreas; next, because it is now clear that abnormal pancreatic development can give rise to specific forms of diabetes in humans; and finally, because, if we want to define new treatments for diabetes based on cell therapy or regenerative medicine, we will have to understand in detail how beta-cells develop. In the present paper, we summarize what we currently know concerning pancreatic development and concentrate on some intercellular and environmental signals controlling pancreatic development.

Glucose is necessary for embryonic pancreatic endocrine cell differentiation.

Mature pancreatic cells develop during embryonic life from endodermal progenitors, and this developmental process depends on activation of a hierarchy of transcription factors. While information is available on mesodermal signals controlling pancreas development, little is known about environmental factors, such as the levels of nutrients including glucose, that may control this process. Here, we studied the effects of glucose on pancreatic cells development. We used an in vitro model where both endocrine and acinar cells develop from early pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1 (PDX1)-positive embryonic pancreatic progenitors. We first showed that glucose does not have a major effect on global pancreatic cell proliferation, survival, and acinar cell development. On the other hand, glucose controlled both alpha and beta cell development. Specifically, the surface occupied by insulin-positive cells was 20-fold higher in pancreases cultured in presence than in absence of glucose, and this effect was dose-dependent over the range 0.5-10 mm. Glucose did not appear to control beta cell development by activating the proliferation of early progenitors or beta cells themselves but instead tightly regulated cell differentiation. Thus, glucose did not modify the pattern of expression of Neurogenin3, the earliest marker of endocrine progenitor cells, but was necessary for the expression of the transcription factor NeuroD, a direct target of Neurogenin3 known to be important for proper pancreatic endocrine cell development. We conclude that glucose interferes with the pancreatic endocrine cells development by regulating the transition between Ngn3 and upstream NeuroD.