A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Etanercept, which blocks the action of tumor necrosis factor, reduces disease activity in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis. Its efficacy in reducing disease activity and preventing joint damage in patients with active early rheumatoid arthritis is unknown. METHODS: We treated 632 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis with either twice-weekly subcutaneous etanercept (10 or 25 mg) or weekly oral methotrexate (mean, 19 mg per week) for 12 months. Clinical response was defined as the percent improvement in disease activity according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. Bone erosion and joint-space narrowing were measured radiographically and scored with use of the Sharp scale. On this scale, an increase of 1 point represents one new erosion or minimal narrowing. RESULTS: As compared with patients who received methotrexate, patients who received the 25-mg dose of etanercept had a more rapid rate of improvement, with significantly more patients having 20 percent, 50 percent, and 70 percent improvement in disease activity during the first six months (P<0.05). The mean increase in the erosion score during the first 6 months was 0.30 in the group assigned to receive 25 mg of etanercept and 0.68 in the methotrexate group (P= 0.001), and the respective increases during the first 12 months were 0.47 and 1.03 (P=0.002). Among patients who received the 25-mg dose of etanercept, 72 percent had no increase in the erosion score, as compared with 60 percent of patients in the methotrexate group (P=0.007). This group of patients also had fewer adverse events (P=0.02) and fewer infections (P= 0.006) than the group that was treated with methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with oral methotrexate, subcutaneous [corrected] etanercept acted more rapidly to decrease symptoms and slow joint damage in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis.

Etanercept in children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of etanercept, a soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (p75):Fc fusion protein, in children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis who did not tolerate or had an inadequate response to methotrexate. METHODS: Patients 4 to 17 years old received 0.4 mg of etanercept per kilogram of body weight subcutaneously twice weekly for up to three months in the initial, open-label part of a multicenter trial. Those who responded to treatment then entered a double-blind study and were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or etanercept for four months or until a flare of the disease occurred. A response was defined as an improvement of 30 percent or more in at least three of six indicators of disease activity, with no more than one indicator worsening by more than 30 percent. RESULTS: At the end of the open-label study, 51 of the 69 patients (74 percent) had had responses to etanercept treatment. In the double-blind study, 21 of the 26 patients who received placebo (81 percent) withdrew because of disease flare, as compared with 7 of the 25 patients who received etanercept (28 percent) (P=0.003). The median time to disease flare with placebo was 28 days, as compared with more than 116 days with etanercept (P<0.001). In the double-blind study, there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in the frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with etanercept leads to significant improvement in patients with active polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Etanercept is well tolerated by pediatric patients.

Enhanced lymphoproliferation and diminished autoimmunity in CD4-deficient MRL/lpr mice.

MRL/lpr mice spontaneously develop an autoimmune disease with features of systemic lupus erythematosus. They also develop a lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by a massive accumulation of double-negative (DN) T cells that lack both CD4 and CD8. To clarify the role of CD4 in autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation in these mice, CD4-deficient MRL/lpr mice were generated. CD4-deficient MRL/lpr mice developed massive expansion of DN T cells in the blood, spleen, and lymph nodes, which significantly exceeded the degree of lymphoproliferation in CD4-expressing control MRL/lpr mice. Despite this lymphoproliferation, CD4-deficient MRL/lpr mice produced little, if any, antibodies to double-stranded DNA, and they had prolonged survival relative to CD4-expressing littermates. However, they eventually developed moderately severe nephritis, characterized by immunoglobulin and complement deposition in glomeruli, vasculitis, and renal infiltration by CD8+ T cells. These findings indicate that (1) lymphoproliferation in MRL/lpr mice does not require the expression of CD4; (2) autoantibody production in MRL/lpr mice is dependent on the expression of CD4 and not on the accumulation of DN T cells; and (3) the development of nephritis in MRL/lpr mice involves both CD4-dependent and CD4-independent mechanisms.

Long-term inhibition of murine lupus by brief simultaneous blockade of the B7/CD28 and CD40/gp39 costimulation pathways.

Murine lupus in NZB/NZW F1 (B/W) mice can be retarded by sustained administration of CTLA4Ig and by brief treatment early in life with mAb that block CD40/gp39 interactions. We sought to determine whether brief therapy with CTLA4Ig could provide sustained benefit in B/W mice and whether a synergistic effect could be derived by blockade of both the B7/CD28 and the CD40/gp39 pathways. We found that a short course of CTLA4Ig at the onset of disease produced only short-term benefit. However, when CTLA4Ig was combined with anti-gp39, there was long-lasting inhibition of autoantibody production and renal disease. Ten months after the 2-wk course of therapy, 70% of these mice were alive, compared with only 18% and 0% of those that received only anti-gp39 or CTLA4Ig, respectively. These findings demonstrate that brief simultaneous blockade of the B7/CD28 and CD40/gp39 costimulation pathways can produce benefit that lasts long after treatment has been discontinued.

Interleukin 6 promotes murine lupus in NZB/NZW F1 mice.

To investigate the role of IL-6 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we selectively inhibited IL-6 in lupus-prone NZB/NZW F1(B/W) mice by chronic administration of a rat mAb to mouse IL-6. Anti-IL-6 alone elicited an anti-rat response that blocked its biologic effects. To circumvent this problem, we rendered B/W mice tolerant to the rat mAb by administration of anti-CD4 concurrent with the first dose of anti-IL-6. Thereafter, the mice received weekly injections of anti-IL-6 alone. There were two control groups: one group received the tolerizing regimen of anti-CD4 along with a control rat IgG1 mAb (GL113) instead of anti-IL-6; the other control group received PBS. Mice that received anti-CD4 were tolerant to the rat mAb for 6 mo. Throughout this period, treatment with anti-IL-6 prevented production of anti-dsDNA, significantly reduced proteinuria, and prolonged life. Mice that received anti-IL-6 without anti-CD4 developed an immune response to the rat mAb and then developed anti-dsDNA antibodies, proteinuria, and mortality comparable with control mice. These findings establish that IL-6 promotes autoimmunity in B/W mice. They further indicate that, although mAb to IL-6 can suppress murine lupus, the development of host immunity to the mAb abrogates its beneficial effects. Finally, this is the first study to demonstrate that a brief course of anti-CD4 can induce tolerance to another therapeutic mAb, in this case an anti-cytokine mAb.

Treatment of murine lupus with CTLA4Ig.

The interaction of B7-related molecules on antigen-presenting cells with CD28 or CTLA-4 antigens on T cells provides a second signal for T cell activation. Selection inhibition of the B7-CD28 or B7-CTLA-4 interactions produces antigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and suppresses immune function in vivo. To determine whether selective inhibition of the B7-CD28 or B7-CTLA-4 interactions could suppress spontaneous autoimmune disease, a B7-binding protein was generated by genetic fusion of the extracellular domain of murine CTLA-4 to the Fc portion of a mouse immunoglobulin G2a monoclonal antibody (muCTLA4Ig). In lupus-prone NZB/NZW filial generation (F1) mice, treatment with muCTLA4Ig blocked autoantibody production and prolonged life, even when treatment was delayed until the most advanced stage of clinical illness. These findings suggest a possible role for human CTLA4Ig in the treatment of autoimmune diseases in humans.

The role of T-cell subsets in the response to anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies.

Administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to CD3 elicits an immune response to the mAb and an acute toxic syndrome that has been attributed to the release of cytokines from activated T cells. To clarify the cellular basis for these effects, we used anti-lymphocyte mAb to deplete selected T-cell subsets from BALB/c mice prior to administration of anti-CD3. In our first series of experiments, anti-CD4 repeatedly blocked the immune response to anti-CD3, but did not prevent severe toxicity. This observation suggested that other T-cell subsets might contribute to anti-CD3 induced toxicity. Therefore, we treated mice with mAb to CD8 as well as mAb to CD4 prior to administration of anti-CD3. Despite depletion of > 95% of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, toxicity was not suppressed. This finding cast doubt on the belief that toxicity is due to activation of either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells by anti-CD3. Therefore, we assessed the role of thymocytes (which are not deleted by the mAb) and gamma delta + T cells. Thymectomy did not prevent toxicity in CD4/CD8-depleted mice, demonstrating that thymocytes are not responsible for toxicity. Anti-alpha beta TCR mAb produced a toxic reaction similar to anti-CD3 whereas anti-gamma delta TCR mAb did not, suggesting that gamma delta+ T cells are not the source of toxic cytokines. In addition, we proved that anti-CD3-induced toxicity was not due to direct effects on macrophages or to other nonspecific factors associated with the hamster mAb. These findings imply that a few residual mature T cells in mice treated with mAb to CD4 and CD8 are sufficient for the full expression of the anti-CD3-induced toxic syndrome. To confirm that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells can mediate toxicity, we showed that:(i) SCID mice, which normally do not develop anti-CD3-induced toxicity, can be rendered susceptible by reconstitution with purified CD4+ T cells; and (ii) CD4-knockout mice that lack CD4+ T cells but have normal CD8+ T cells are susceptible to anti-CD3-induced toxicity. These findings establish that both CD4+ and CD8+ cells contribute to the toxic effects of anti-CD3, and that relatively few cells are required to mediate the full effect.