The impact of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardias on the hemodynamic status of patients with pulmonary hypertension.

The impact of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardias (AF/AT), and their optimal treatment strategy in PH patients is still being discussed. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of AF/AT termination on the hemodynamic parameters in PH patients. We compared patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH group), left ventricular heart failure (LV-HF group), and a Control group. A repeated right heart catheterization was performed during the catheter ablation (CA) procedure. The first measurement was done in arrhythmia, the second after the sinus rhythm (SR) was restored. High frequency atrial stimulation was used to simulate AT in patients without arrhythmia presence at the time of the CA. The variation of pressure parameters in PH patients did not differ significantly from the Controls. There was a significant increase in the right ventricle pressure after the SR restoration in the LV-HF group compared to the Controls and PH group (+4 vs. -2 vs. -3 mmHg, p<0.05). The cardiac index (CI) variation was not significant when compared between the study groups. An increase of the CI after the SR restoration was found in those patients with AF (+0.31 l/min/m2 [IQR 0.18; 0.58]) in contrast to those patients with organized AT/high frequency atrial stimulation ( 0.09 l/min/m2, [IQR - 0.45; 0.19]). This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The acute hemodynamic response to arrhythmia termination was not significantly different in the PH patients when compared to the Controls. In contrast to AT/high frequency stimulation, the restoration of SR in AF patients leads to an increased CI, irrespective of the presence or absence of PH.

The Role of Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Tachycardias in Patients With Isolated Pre-capillary Pulmonary Hypertension.

Atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardias (AF/AT) have been reported as a common condition in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). As yet, limited data exists about the significance of the borderline post-capillary pressure component on the occurrence of AF / AT in patients with isolated pre-capillary PH. We retrospectively studied the prevalence of AF / AT in 333 patients (mean age 61 ± 15 years, 44% males) with pre-capillary idiopathic / familiar pulmonary arterial hypertension, and inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The prevalence of AF / AT was analyzed in different categories of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP). In the study population overall, the mean PAWP was 10.5 ± 3 mmHg, median of 11 mmHg, range 2-15 mmHg. AF / AT was diagnosed in 79 patients (24%). The proportion of AF / AT among patients with PAWP below the median (?11 mmHg) was lower than in subjects with PAWP between 12 and 15 mmHg, 30 (16%) vs. 46 (35%), p = 0.0001. Compared to the patients with PAWP?11 mmHg, subjects with PAWP between 12 and 15 mmHg were older (65 ± 13 years vs. 58 ± 16), with more prevalent arterial hyperte\nsion [100 (70%) vs. 106 (55%)] and diabetes mellitus [50 (35%) vs. 48 (25%)], showed larger size of the left atrium (42 ± 7 vs. 40 ± 6 mm), and higher values of right atrium pressure (12 ± 5 vs. 8 ± 5 mm Hg), p < 0.05 in all comparisons. The prevalence of AF / AT in the group studied increased with the growing post-capillary component.

Disparity between two-dimensional echocardiographic and electroanatomic left and right atrial volumes in patients undergoing catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Left atrial (LA) volume (LAV) is used for the selection of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) to rhythm control strategies. Calculation of LAV from the LA diameters and areas by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography may result in significant error. Accuracy of atrial volume assessment has never been studied in patients with long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF) and significant atrial remodeling. This study investigated correlation and agreement between 2D echocardiographic (Simpson method) and electroanatomic (CARTO, Biosense Webster) left and right atrial (RA) volumes (LAV(ECHO) vs. LAV(CARTO) and RAV(ECHO) vs. RAV(CARTO)) in patients undergoing catheter ablation for LSPAF. The study enrolled 173 consecutive subjects (females: 21 %, age: 59+/-9 years). There was only modest correlation between LAV(ECHO) (92+/-31 ml) and LAV(CARTO) (178+/-37 ml) (R=0.57), and RAV(ECHO) (71+/-29 ml) and RAV(CARTO) (173+/-34 ml) (R=0.42), respectively. LAV(ECHO) and RAV(ECHO) underestimated LAV(CARTO) and RAV(CARTO) with the absolute bias (+/-1.96 standard deviation) of -85 (-148; -22) ml and -102 (-169; -35) ml, respectively, and with the relative bias of -48 (-75; -21) % and -59 (-88; -30) %, respectively (all P<0.000001 for their mutual difference). Significant confounders of this difference were not identified. In patients with LSPAF, 2D echocardiography significantly underestimated both LA and RA volumes as compared with electroanatomic reference. This disagreement was independent of clinical, echocardiographic and mapping characteristics.