First experience of POLARx™ versus Arctic Front Advance™: An early technology comparison.

INTRODUCTION: Cryoballoon ablation is an established technique to achieve pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a new manufacturer of cryoballoon achieved regulatory CE marking (POLARx™; Boston Scientific). We describe our early experience of using this new market entrant of the technology and describe procedural aspects in comparison to the incumbent Medtronic Arctic Front Advance™. METHODS: We assessed the first 40 AF ablations performed with the POLARx catheter at the Barts Heart Centre. These patients were compared with a contemporaneous series of patients undergoing ablation by the same operators using the Arctic Front Advance. Procedural metrics were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: A total of four operators undertook 40 cases using the POLARx catheter, compared with 40 cases using the Arctic Front Advance. Procedure times (60.0 vs. 60.0 min) were similar between the two technologies, however left atrial dwell time (35.0 vs 39.0 min) and fluoroscopy times (3.3 vs. 5.2 min) were higher with the POLARx. Measured nadir and isolation balloon temperatures were significantly lower with POLARx. Almost all veins were isolated with a median freezing time of 16.0 (POLARx) versus 15.0 (Arctic Front Advance) min. The rate of procedural complications was low in both groups. CONCLUSION: The POLARx cryoballoon is effective for pulmonary vein isolation. Measured isolation and nadir temperatures are lower compared with the predicate Arctic Front Advance catheter. The technology appears similar in acute efficacy and has a short learning curve, but formal dosing studies may be required to prove equivalence of efficacy.

The contribution of pathways initiated via the Gq\11 G-protein family to atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the commonest cardiac arrhythmia and leads to significant clinical morbidity and mortality. It has a complex pathophysiology but is often initiated by atrial ectopic beats and because of atrial remodelling once it occurs it can become established. Thus therapeutic interventions designed to prevent the initial occurrence of the arrhythmia are particularly needed. At the cellular level, these ectopic beats arise because of abnormal calcium release events from the sarcoplasmic reticulum leading to an inward current mediated by the sodium-calcium exchanger. There has been considerable interest in this over the last few years largely focused on the ryanodine receptor and related signalling pathways. However, atrial myocytes also possess a well-developed inositol trisphosphate (IP3) dependent calcium release system and this has been less studied. In this review we focus on pathways and molecules that couple via the Gq\11 family of G-proteins including regulators of G-protein signalling that may influence IP3 mediated calcium release and atrial fibrillation.

Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 'real-world' impact of a novel contact force (CF)-sensing (SmartTouch™, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) catheter coupled with an advanced catheter location (ACL) system on fluoroscopy time and fluoroscopy dose during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data of 1515 consecutive patients undergoing paroxysmal AF (PAF) and persistent AF (PerAF) ablation at a single institution between 2009 and 2014. Patients undergoing AF ablation with the SmartTouch catheter and the ACL system (SmartTouch group, n = 510) were compared with those undergoing AF ablation without this technology (control group, n = 1005). The primary outcomes were total fluoroscopy time (min) and fluoroscopy dose as measured by the dose-area product (mGy cm(2)). Secondary endpoints included total procedure time, total ablation time, and major cardiac complications (tamponade, pericardial effusion, and urgent cardiac surgery). The SmartTouch group had significantly lower fluoroscopy times (9.5 vs. 41 min, P < 0.001), radiation doses (1044 vs. 3571 mGy cm(2), P < 0.001), and shorter procedural time (195 vs. 240 min, P < 0.001) when compared with the control group. This was statistically significant for both PAF and PerAF ablations and for both de novo and redo AF procedures. After a learning curve, a median fluoroscopy time of 3.5 min (interquartile range 6) for all AF ablations was achieved. There was no difference in the rate of cardiac complications (∼ 1.5%). CONCLUSION: SmartTouch™ CF-sensing catheter use with ACL™ during AF ablation significantly reduces fluoroscopy times by 77%, radiation dose by 71%, and procedural time by 19% but does not improve overall safety or the risk of cardiac complications.