The use of immunotherapy treatment in malignant pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytomas are a subset of paragangliomas, which are a rare group of neural crest cell-derived tumors. Malignant cases of both pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are even rarer, and currently there is no standard of care. This case report details the use of off-label immunotherapy and its efficacy in the management of the aforementioned tumor. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein is presented a case of a 60-year-old Caucasian female with a rare malignant pheochromocytoma. The tumor was determined to be unresectable because of involvement of surrounding organs. Radiation therapy was also not a viable option because of concerns over appreciable toxicity in relation to mass size. As there is no standard of care for malignant cases, the patient was started on chemotherapeutic agents but was soon shown to be intolerant to this treatment. As she was ineligible for several clinical trials, the patient was started on the off-label immunotherapeutic agents nivolumab and ipilimumab. Immunotherapy use resulted in decreased tumor size, improved quality of life, and reconsideration for radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of immunotherapy in pheochromocytoma in this patient clearly demonstrated substantial benefit, as she was able to be reconsidered for radiation therapy. Not only has the patient been tolerant of this treatment, but she has exhibited progression-free survival of over 20 months. As there is no current standard treatment for malignant pheochromocytomas, the success of its use in this patient lends support to the ongoing clinical trials regarding the use of immunotherapy in rare tumors, including pheochromocytomas.

Molecular Profiling of Advanced Malignancies: A Community Oncology Network Experience and Review of Literature.

Background: Many genomic alterations have been identified that are critical to the malignant phenotype. Some of these, termed "driver mutations," are critical for tumor proliferation and progression. The landscape of targeted therapy has expanded as well. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumors reveals cancer-related genomic alterations and provides therapeutic recommendations for specific targeted therapy. We analyzed our experience with FoundationOne, a validated NGS genomic profiling test, in a community oncology network. Methods: NGS results from May 2014 to September 2016 from a community oncology network in Western Pennsylvania were analyzed. Medical records were reviewed for primary site, stage, biopsy site, time of testing, prior treatment, FDA-approved therapy in patient's and other tumor types and potential clinical trials based upon mutations detected. Two co-primary endpoints for this study were to determine the percentage of patients having mutations with a FDA-approved targeted agent and the percentage of patients in whom a treatment decision was made based on these NGS results. Results: One Fifty-Seven NGS results were available for analysis. 82% patients had a mutation with a FDA-approved targeted agent available while 18% patients had no FDA-approved targeted agent for the mutation detected. Clinical trials were available for 93% cases. The NGS results were utilized in treatment decisions in 18% patients (n = 28) with, 7% (n = 11) initiating a targeted agent, 6% (n = 9) were on an appropriate targeted agent prior to testing and 5% (n = 8) being unable to start a targeted agent because of insurance denial, clinical deterioration or patient preference. 38% cases were tested early in the disease course (at diagnosis, during or shortly after first-line treatment) and 62% at progression. Conclusions: NGS is a valuable tool to identify molecular targets for personalizing cancer care. From our experience, the actual number of patients starting a targeted agent based on NGS results is low but it provides substantial information in terms of providing additional treatment options, identifying resistance conferring mutations and facilitating clinical trial enrollment. Optimal time of testing, early or late in disease course, financial implications of testing and using targeted therapy and survival benefit of targeted therapy need further studies.

Retrospective review of total neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by resection and postoperative multi-agent chemotherapy (maChT) is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. Using this approach, maChT administration can be delayed for several months, leading to concern for distant metastases. To counteract this, a novel treatment approach known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has gained popularity, in which patients receive both maChT and nCRT prior to resection. We utilized the National Cancer Database to examine temporal trends in TNT usage, and any potential effect on survival. AIM: To study the temporal trends in the usage of TNT and evaluate its efficacy compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, Stage II-III, from 2004-2015 treated with nCRT or TNT. TNT was defined as maChT initiated ≥ 90 d prior to nCRT initiation. Overall survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of last contact or death using Kaplan-Meier curves to present the cumulative probability of survival, with log-rank statistics to assess significance. Multivariable cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival and propensity score analysis accounted for bias. RESULTS: We identified 9066 eligible patients, with 8812 and 254 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by maChT and TNT, respectively. Nodal involvement, stage III disease, and treatment in recent years were predictive of TNT use. There was greater use of TNT with more advanced stage, specifically > 1 node involved (odds ratio [OR] = 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11-3.93, P < 0.01) and stage III disease (OR = 2.88, 95%CI: 2.11-3.93, P < 0.01). From 2010 to 2012 the use of TNT increased (OR = 2.41, 95%CI: 1.27-4.56, P < 0.01) with a greater increase from 2013 to 2015 (OR = 6.62, 95%CI: 3.57-12.25, P < 0.01). Both the TNT and neoadjuvant chemoradiation arms had a similar 5-year survival at 76% and 78% respectively. Multivariable analysis with propensity score demonstrated that increased age, high comorbidity score, higher grade, African American race, and female gender had worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrates a rising trend in TNT use, particularly in patients with worse disease. Patients treated with TNT and nCRT had similar survival. Randomized trials evaluating TNT are underway.